
sin0822
Members-
Posts
756 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by sin0822
-
Okay. if you have issues with XMP you can email me and I will send the data so that it can be fixed. Otherwise if the Samsung issue is fixed then the F6X and F10X have done their jobs, your other issue might be fixed soon, but obviously this BIOS wasn't meant to deal with that.
-
I just want to say this isn't a final release, it was just provided to me to test out to make sure samsung and some of the other things i complained about were fixed, i think they will just incorporate these fixes into future BIOSes. All i am trying to say is what i said in the first post of mine in this thread, I cannot recommend changes that will affect the performance of these boards because i don't work for gigabyte. F6X is just to confirm a fix, it isn't a beta release. it was literally complied and sent to me like minutes after it was compiled. i was hesitant to put it online for this reason, but I had to go ahead to post it and I wanted to see if it fixed the samsung issue for many people. I was also told this: That this BIOS for UP5 requires a bit more tuning than before for 2-DIMM at 2600 than for 4-DIMM. At least with samsung, the same might be for the flares. I would try changing the stability level to like both 4s or both 5s, or even try 14s or 25s. Once hicookie told me that some kits with higher frequency require that change int he stability level, but it differs per kit and to find out you have ot try all levels, which i think is a pain. Now leeghoofd, if you load the XMp and it wont work at all, then that is a problem i can report to be fixed, but from what i am seeing that isn't what you reported as a problem, you are reporting that without XMP it isn't working.
-
What the f**k is my affiliation with GB that is different than yours? .
-
How are the profiles broken? Their real use is to go from one board with the same BIOS to another board with the same BIOS. Some things random things even in the non OC section might change or be added in separate BIOSes, they will cause issues with the profiles, like CPu PLL OV is one of them. I have made and distributed profiles on the UD3H what BIOS or what were your issues with the profile sharing?
-
so you messed up a simple BIOS flash? Zeneffect said that his flares kit now is much easier to work with with this BIOS. I would say things that mattered where made better, you obsession with wanting timings that are to tight to be loosened is just a tad odd. IDK anyone other than you who refuses to load modern XMP profiles.
-
also here is for UP5 Th http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?2a68g1hg5iv08o7 make cure to power cycle the board after flashing.
-
I confirmed I will now post it publicly: http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?c88l5bnj86gx37n
-
i thin i might go buy this one: http://www.assus.com/
-
isn't SoF banned?
-
temperature of the ICes or something, so he said he had a few tricks up his sleeve and took care of it. I guess something that wasn't set for non XMP kits is my guess. It was odd because at a cold boot he and I could both once in a while boot up at 2400mhz depending on the board, UD5H it worked for him, and UP5 it worked for me twice. Anyways this fix works all the time, if you set your memory and don't touch it, i can boot up on a cold boot, or i can restart the machine 50 times and have the same OC and stability, I tested those two conditions many times on both boards. Ran 32m many times both at 2400 and 2600. I didn't try 2666, i was already at 1.7v lol. if anyone is wondering i used these timings: Yea try this: 10 12 12 25 Auto 6 6 12 Auto 8 147 6 27 T1 Auto Auto 7936 69 5 5 4 4 6 3 6 5 5
-
Samsung ULV working correctly now with a solution: First off the Z77X-UD5H running 2x4GB Samsung Green ULV@ 2600 Cas 10 T1 Second we have the beautiful Z77X-UP5 TH-CF running 2x4GB Samsung Green ULV@ 2600 Cas 10 T1
-
perhaps it is a front and in 24 hours some people will take you out for uncovering their front. I bet you the owner of that site can prob get easy $50K for it, because imagine how many companies want that name. Hopefully someone will make a company called sinhardware and they will need a URL.
-
indeed. I have 5 G shot at like 1.2v, but i didn't want to confuse anyone so i never posted it.
-
you can actually ool down to -185C and lower 5G VCore down past 1.2v, i have tried it.
-
yea it should be there soon.
-
G1.Killer style: http://www.mediafire.com/?7z8j7nvmy81wcv7
-
lol what do you think
-
nice one mad22!
-
Ivy Bridge 3570K/3770K Batch and Serial Numbers
sin0822 replied to Massman's topic in Ivy Bridge (Z77) OC
so it seems that higher leakage CPUs clock higher? However my 6.7G CPU boot at 5ghz easily and I can max valid at 5.3 on air, i have nother that does 5.3 on air, but doesn't do 6.7g. I have a 3570K that wont do 5Ghz no matter what and it max valid is 6.3 -
Ivy Bridge 3570K/3770K Batch and Serial Numbers
sin0822 replied to Massman's topic in Ivy Bridge (Z77) OC
wow that is very different, that in itself reduces hope. -
Very nice! hahaha
-
haha i love this statment:
-
Ivy Bridge 3570K/3770K Batch and Serial Numbers
sin0822 replied to Massman's topic in Ivy Bridge (Z77) OC
interesting, so your 5GHz CPU did 6.6 SPI 32M that is very good! -
Ivy Bridge 3570K/3770K Batch and Serial Numbers
sin0822 replied to Massman's topic in Ivy Bridge (Z77) OC
yea that is very nice! -
yea that is tough, i think cookie did it tho. Hey massmanI have yet to ever play in a LAN party.