-
Posts
1518 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
35
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by TASOS
-
-
Good score , congrats !!
-
Nice score , nothing fancy.
🙂How can you tell during the bench , that the run is going well , when you dont have the fps info from the counter ?
I wonder how difficult is it for a UL (Futuremark) programmer to fix that 999 fps limit for the bench screen.
-
Ultra clocks !!!
-
-
9 hours ago, Antinomy said:
Hex editor.
You don't need a special microcode for mobiles, it's the same as desktops. It wasn't about microcodes at all. In fact when we talk about compatibility, it's 95% not the microcodes.
Hmm
So what did the Abit IS7 had , that all the other brands (including other Abit boards) did not have ? (regarding P4 mobiles working out of the box) ?
-
4 hours ago, Antinomy said:
When you thought everything should be found after 20 years, lol.
Another update to you!
Change list:
1) Added support for Mobile Pentium 4 Prescott CPUs. EIST is enabled so you can use any MSR utility of choice to change the multiplier (CrystalCPUID, CPUMSR, RMClock, etc.)
2) Added tRAS values 9 and 10 to BIOS setup
3) Fixed help message for Advanced memory settings section
4) Set default system date to 01/01/2024
http://valid.x86.fr/6pmnfzShould work with P4C800-E, P4P800 2.0 and P4P800 SE. Issues are reported with P4C800 (timings are not set). I don't have this board so can't check myself. P4P800 series (-SE too) work with memory in slots 1 and 3 only.
How do you edit the asus bios ? which tool ?
How did you implement the mobile microcode ? you have the microcode as a file in hand ?edit
Many years ago i was trying (with no luck) to extract the microcode from an Abit bios and implement it to Asus ... but never managed to do it.
I always had some kind of checksum mismatch stopping me 😄 -
18 hours ago, GENiEBEN said:
Thanks for reporting, it should now be fixed
works fine
Uploaded
411,412,419,420 ... and Oct 2007 Hotfix- 1
-
The help we need to complete the collection,might be possible.
I have 4 more versions of 4.xxx
Also a 2007 hotfix
-
4 hours ago, GENiEBEN said:
Got a version you want to share with others? Please use the following link to upload it and I will add it to the collection: https://cloud.codin.uk/apps/files/files/54087?dir=/OCTA/Uploads
Asks for a username and password ?
-
Close this add please.
ALL sold.
-
On 4/11/2024 at 8:23 PM, kaliz said:
when testing different openCL version for G7400 the difference in scores are also noticable. Seems like a version of 1.2 is faster then 2.1 and 3.0. Not sure which one.
Does anyone know which version is the fastest for Alder Lake non K ? thanks
Not sure if an older version is faster ...
People who know , will probably not tell.
But now at least you have most of the available versions in hand , so you can test for yourself. -
10 hours ago, GENiEBEN said:
This is my collection, should be more or less almost complete.
https://cloud.codin.uk/s/mSB4T4YKxwfHf2D
I cannot access your link
504 Gateway Time-out
openresty
Judging by the photo only , you have a couple versions that i dont ... and i have a couple versions that you dont
-
This platform and it's bios modding , is still interesting in 2024.
I want to thank all members , participants here for their shared knowledge and i hope they will continue to support this thread if they can.
and again , THANK YOU all.
- 3
-
That's a 5Ghz score
-
4 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:
No, I am sorry I only have those two versions saved. Intel has a bad practice of taking down old versions of drivers when they are replaced by newer versions and I was lucky to have saved those versions because they are difficult to find. The do the same thing with XTU and there are some older CPUs that only work correctly with older versions of XTU.
Yeap , that's true and unpleasant.
2 minutes ago, Mr.Scott said:I will check. I may have those.
Thanks Scotty
-
1 hour ago, TAGG said:
Thats well over a grand in GPUs...
Make it actually afordable to go out and buy cards to have fun, one ATI one Nvidia and NV17/RV280 then it's like cheapaz but with GPUs we'd never get for cheapaz cause too old Maybe consider making Nvidia one 01 and ATI one 03 running single test of 03 is no fun.
To be honest , i took as granted that almost all of us , have atleast one of each NV core.
But still , cant be that expensive ... (i see most price range is from 15 to 70 euro and the geforce256 is the most expensive at 90++)
https://www.ebay.at/sch/i.html?item=395320642025&rt=nc&_ssn=henengelber0&_pgn=1
https://www.ebay.at/sch/i.html?_nkw=geforce+4+ti&_sop=2
-
My proposal is classic.
Plain and simple stages , no unicorns needed for someone that wants to have fun.3DMark03
Nvidia GeForce (AGP) history revivalStage 1 : 1x NV10 score
Stage 2 : 1x NV15 score
Stage 3 : 1x NV20 score
Stage 4 : 1x NV25 score
Bonus Stage : 1x NV28 score (GF4 Ti 4200 or GF4 Ti 4800SE only)
PiFast
Fastest SDRAMStage 1 : 1x socket370 score
Stage 2 : 1x socket462 score
Bonus Stage : 1x socket478 score (Willamette core only)
- 1
-
This series of competition needs some WD40
Lets organize something.
- 1
-
14 hours ago, Mr. Fox said:
I uploaded it to my OneDrive for anyone that needs it. Should allow download without sign-in.
Any chance you have any of the versions i am looking for ? (2021.4 - 2022.0 - 2022.1)
-
Very nice thread , as part of hwbot history.
Very few bits missing.
Alby check your pm's about this.
-
Someone hacked the link ? ... behind the word "Computex" in the first line of the article at the front page.
It leads to an FB page of a local shop in Baku Azerbaijan.
-
Nice cpu bracket !!
- 1
-
10 hours ago, mcmanus9442 said:
Latency is pretty much similar, but A die can also run MUCH tighter Trfc as opposed to M die.
What about tFaw and other performance secondary and tertiary timings ?
I am also trying to figure out ,
Why do people who bench aircooled tend to prefer the later versions of M-die sticks ?
Lower voltages (and temps) for the same speed and primary timings compared to A-die ?Does an average good IMC have the same behaviour with a 32GB A-die kit and a 48GB M-die kit ?
p.s.
Sorry for asking more general questions in a review thread.- 1
-
On 3/19/2024 at 7:36 PM, Mr. Fox said:
... the second variation of M-die used on the 24GB modules overclocks higher than the A-die and requires less voltage than the A-die.
I think , this is the key point.
A friend from the States was telling me the same thing about the Patriot extreme 5 kit , where the 8200 48gb kit (M-die) is performing better than the 8200 32gb kit (A-die)
But what about latencies ?
- 1
Benchmark Tweak Software - Broken links, plz go to Benchmark Tweak Software 2024 post
in Benchmark software
Posted · Edited by TASOS
The links are dead , i'm not sure this is a browser related problem. (same message in both chrome and firefox).
@Leeghoofd