[Wrong Result]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588457

Prescott 2.8A in 2.8E category

 

This entry above has not been fixed.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642959

Bench run @ 640x480 16bit

[Wrong Result]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571016 no verification screen,or link

 

I fixxed it my self.

I uploaded the verification picture.

 

edit

The verification image was at a previous forum i used for hwbot

The post was modified so the url was lost.

http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?postid=414556#post414556

[Wrong Result]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588457

Prescott 2.8A in 2.8E category

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627612

P4 Northwood 1.8@1.8 does 73sec pifast

Better score than a 1.8@3.1 GHZ

I need proof this is a valid hexus pifast version 4.1 result.

[Wrong Result]

Holly Molly ..... 0.63 spi 1M

 

And with a checksum validation

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632037

 

Does this guy have other results on the bot too ??

[Wrong Result]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569900

 

OLD version of superpi without decimal digits

 

This score should be validated as 12.99

[Wrong Result]

1)This result is from an ATI 9000 PRO

 

It shows clearly in this photo

http://images.people.overclockers.ru/71871.jpg

 

It also has a wrong futuremark link.

The correct one is below

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8966756

 

 

2)This score is correct

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=511147

 

But to be valid,please add the following Forum post

http://www.overclocking-masters.com/forum/hwbot-Classement-Super-PI-1M,p51914.htm#p51914

 

Screnshot

http://112233445566.free.fr/PM740/22.281.jpg

 

 

Edit please

Thanks

[Wrong Result]

Some more links for editing....

 

1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559983

 

Verified by a moderator ....by mistake i believe.

The score belongs to a P4 3.0 'E'

 

2)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559973

 

This screenshot can't verify the result. (just a clockgen picture) ??

It could be any kind of cpu.

[Wrong Result]

Now they are

Thanks

[Wrong Result]

Are the scores fixed ?

[Wrong Result]

The result below...i believe,belongs to the Celeron 478s 335 section.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570425

 

This one,also...(Family 15 Model 3 Stepping 3) 256kb cache...that's a prescott core...so its a Celeron 335

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=574804

 

Also,this one is NOT a mobile XP2500+ ...it's a regular Barton XP2500+

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=506961

 

[mbot]Dani - 33 - Abit NF7-S v2, Barton2500+ (non mobile)@3032MHz, 253FSB 1:1[/mbot]