Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TASOS

Members
  • Posts

    1519
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    36

Everything posted by TASOS

  1. wPrime-32M Section : Core 2 T7200 The results below are NOT T7200...(they are Core 2 4400) User=Mauri 1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603576 User=bossdog (example of submission in Wprime database ... http://www.wprime.net/score.cgi?id=9783 2)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635207 3)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635206 4)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626606 5)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625967 User=anonynous (His own verification link http://www.wprime.net/score.cgi?id=5771 6)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603094 wPrime-1024M Section : Core 2 T7200 User=Mauri 1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603577 Superpi-32M Section : Core 2 T7200 User=Zaltan 1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595232 No image,no proof Reported 3 times already
  2. I believe that PCM Vantage should be added.
  3. Intel Celeron 733 into P-III 733 section http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626204 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626202
  4. I just did that. I believe everything is ok now.
  5. I have a HD2900XT 512MB. The bot re-scanned old forum post results....and made new entry results as HD2900XT 1GB...(there was no 1GB versions back then). Now i have some double scores with points in my profile Half of them listed as HD2900XT 512MB (correct) Half of them listed as HD2900XT 1GB (wrong) How do i fix this ? 1)Delete the false entries from my profile. 2)Edit forum post description as "HD2900XT 512MB" ? P.S. I was wondering how i got 2-3 more cups and some points the past week ?
  6. ATI 9000 PRO into 9000 section http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=551129
  7. No FM link ... and the picture doesnt show the type of VGA. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643878
  8. Thanks for editing so fast Now i'd like my gold and points back http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=2&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=Radeon+HD+2900+XT+%281224%29&numberOfVideocards=one&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1103&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=
  9. That's probably a CF score ..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648758
  10. There is a point here...yes. If you decide to pull down the above score...maby you should check ALL the scores in his profile. All are PcMark's ... everytime with different Celeron model ... and all of them uploaded manually on-line within 2 days. No futuremark link in any of the scores. http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=7349
  11. You can read the existing topics or open a new topic in one of our local forums. www.overclockers.gr www.thelab.gr www.hwbox.gr It would be more easy to explain in our native language.
  12. No problems at all for the motor ... just by chip-tuning it. Just pick a well known product with full warranty. http://www.mtm-online.de/en/index.php?nav=3&FZID=OCTAVIA2TDI77F
  13. That's 19" BBS CH .... i love them It has a lot more than just chip tuning. If chip tuning equals a good air-cooling for pc's Then my car is definetely on a single stage phase
  14. Very good choice the Octavia...and nice colour pick. I own a 06 GTI ... with a bit more than 300PS :woot:
  15. This entry above has not been fixed. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642959 Bench run @ 640x480 16bit
  16. I fixxed it my self. I uploaded the verification picture. edit The verification image was at a previous forum i used for hwbot The post was modified so the url was lost. http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?postid=414556#post414556
  17. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588457 Prescott 2.8A in 2.8E category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627612 P4 Northwood 1.8@1.8 does 73sec pifast Better score than a 1.8@3.1 GHZ I need proof this is a valid hexus pifast version 4.1 result.
  18. Holly Molly ..... 0.63 spi 1M And with a checksum validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632037 Does this guy have other results on the bot too ??
  19. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569900 OLD version of superpi without decimal digits This score should be validated as 12.99
  20. 1)This result is from an ATI 9000 PRO It shows clearly in this photo http://images.people.overclockers.ru/71871.jpg It also has a wrong futuremark link. The correct one is below http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8966756 2)This score is correct http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=511147 But to be valid,please add the following Forum post http://www.overclocking-masters.com/forum/hwbot-Classement-Super-PI-1M,p51914.htm#p51914 Screnshot http://112233445566.free.fr/PM740/22.281.jpg Edit please Thanks
  21. Some more links for editing.... 1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559983 Verified by a moderator ....by mistake i believe. The score belongs to a P4 3.0 'E' 2)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559973 This screenshot can't verify the result. (just a clockgen picture) ?? It could be any kind of cpu.
×
×
  • Create New...