TASOS

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588457 Prescott 2.8A in 2.8E category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627612 P4 Northwood 1.8@1.8 does 73sec pifast Better score than a 1.8@3.1 GHZ I need proof this is a valid hexus pifast version 4.1 result.

Holly Molly ..... 0.63 spi 1M And with a checksum validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632037 Does this guy have other results on the bot too ??

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569900 OLD version of superpi without decimal digits This score should be validated as 12.99

1)This result is from an ATI 9000 PRO It shows clearly in this photo http://images.people.overclockers.ru/71871.jpg It also has a wrong futuremark link. The correct one is below http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8966756 2)This score is correct http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=511147 But to be valid,please add the following Forum post http://www.overclocking-masters.com/forum/hwbot-Classement-Super-PI-1M,p51914.htm#p51914 Screnshot http://112233445566.free.fr/PM740/22.281.jpg Edit please Thanks

Some more links for editing.... 1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559983 Verified by a moderator ....by mistake i believe. The score belongs to a P4 3.0 'E' 2)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559973 This screenshot can't verify the result. (just a clockgen picture) ?? It could be any kind of cpu.

Thanks

Are the scores fixed ?

The result below...i believe,belongs to the Celeron 478s 335 section. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570425 This one,also...(Family 15 Model 3 Stepping 3) 256kb cache...that's a prescott core...so its a Celeron 335 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=574804 Also,this one is NOT a mobile XP2500+ ...it's a regular Barton XP2500+ http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=506961