TASOS

One thing for sure ... is that the scores from 32MB TNT2 must get unblocked.

I believe things are clear enough. 1st You need a 32MB VGA to run 2k1 properly (minimum requirments). *VGA's with less than 32MB memory could produce non reliable scores. 2nd You have to run the bench with compressed textures or 32bit textures (if there's a hardware limitation).

I dont want to quote anyone in this thread ... for obvious reasons. Just take a minute and read again about default settings and minimum requirements of 3DMark2001SE

ok thanks

This entry http://www.overclockers.gr/vbull/showpost.php?p=456875&postcount=315 Results as Why is this happening ?

I didnt ask to have the ability of unblocking a score. I just want to have a chance to see ... what's all about. When an e-mail of a blocked score comes ... and i open the link and there's nothing i can see and have an opinion.... then it's useless.

We still have an issue about blocked scores. When the Team Moderators cant see those "blocked scores" ... they cant take part. What's the meaning of emailing the Team Moderators then ? I have wrote the same thing a few times before. Make these scores vissible.

Consider also ... the fact,that we are comparing (P35+DDR2@2T) vs (X48+DDR3@1T ... and quite aggresive subtimings).

ok I can see it now.

I cant see it. It says "This entry has been deleted."

As a team moderator ... how can i check this score ? Is it deleted or blocked ?

I never said anything about cheating. In my opinion that score was submitted the wrong way from the start. This score must be deleted even if it was submitted in 1950. There is absolutely no proof for the hardware used (vga) ... so you cant really match it to any category. It could even be a GTo2 with unlocked pipes ... or anything else. Does it even show the display analysis ? ... NO So what's the point of continuing this chat ? What do you want to prove ? Rules must apply for everybody. Let me remind you ... that a result of mine (over a year old) had been deleted by the crew ... repeat deleted (not blocked) just because at that time i was using crystalcpuid instead of cpuz.

1)You skipped the part of the date that the score was submitted 2)Who says that ? 3)It's not about points ... it's about RULES. ...and a few days ago ... the score had points (in an other vga category). Also ... is it "this" or "these" ?

You are kidding ... wright ? The above entry-score has ZERO elements to prove a valid hwbot 2k1 result. Only a link to forumpost,with a photo that doesnt proove anything. A 2K1 photo where the tab score hides everything about the vga and analysis An atitool tab ... that says nothing. ...and a cpuz tab of an opteron.

That score must be deleted.

I know that hwbot does some kind of rounding for the superpi scores. For example (spi1M) 7.301=7.3 and 7.297=7.3 My question. Why should the 7.301 score must be listed in a better place than 7.297 ... just because it was submitted earlier ?

http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=23197&postcount=137

Bump up ....

I am also looking for a vanished result. I had a Dothan M740 superpi 1M result of (22.844 sec) submitted on early 2007. I cant find it anymore. What happened ?

3Dmark 2005 - 17234 marks - Gamer ([M]adshrimps.BE OC-Team) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648037 X1900 CF ... into X1900XTX single card category.

Happy Birthday :celebration::nana:

I believe you are wrong. Take a look again....there's only a score screenshot.

Hot cores ... 99% ... can give very good results with SS,DI,LN2 Much better than the cooler cores. Here in Athens,we have fair good availability (except E8500 in limited quantities). Almost every week,we have new shippments...cause they sell like crazy. and now the BAD NEWS Over a sample of 20-30 cpu's (8400-8500) tested on air-cooling the last 2 weeks with a max Vcore of 1.5volt. Almost all of them ... are loosing speed of 50-80Mhz within a couple of days testing. It seems so far ... that they need a bit more Vcore to maintain their initial overclocked speed after a few days or week. I am talking about Orthos testing primarily. That's not a good sign. We have kept some of these cpu's ...to see what they will do on their 2nd week of testing.

You missed this one Just a screenshot in forumpost No FM link No resolution No vga info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610962

In your case...since your chiller goes down @ -30C ... you'd better submit it as a single phase cooling.