-
Posts
1519 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
36
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by TASOS
-
-
I really do not understand how this score can be checked by a moderator and verified? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718801
That score must be deleted.
-
I know that hwbot does some kind of rounding for the superpi scores.
For example (spi1M)
7.301=7.3 and 7.297=7.3
My question.
Why should the 7.301 score must be listed in a better place than 7.297 ... just because it was submitted earlier ?
-
-
3Dmark 2005 - 17234 marks - Gamer ([M]adshrimps.BE OC-Team)
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648037
X1900 CF ... into X1900XTX single card category.
I am also looking for a vanished result.I had a Dothan M740 superpi 1M result of (22.844 sec) submitted on early 2007.
I cant find it anymore.
What happened ?
Bump up ....
-
I am also looking for a vanished result.
I had a Dothan M740 superpi 1M result of (22.844 sec) submitted on early 2007.
I cant find it anymore.
What happened ?
-
3Dmark 2005 - 17234 marks - Gamer ([M]adshrimps.BE OC-Team)
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648037
date event user description18 Sep 2007 09:22 created Gamer manual online submission
19 Sep 2007 06:36 checked (crew) Massman checked by a moderator ()
X1900 CF ... into X1900XTX single card category.
-
Happy Birthday
:celebration::nana:
-
He obviously ran it at the default settings, as he has the lowest HD3600 score...
More proof is only required for HOF.
I believe you are wrong.
Take a look again....there's only a score screenshot.
-
E8400 - Q746A - Great oc'ers, would easily do 4700-4800 air cooled with normal temps, very low volts needed for Orthos at highs clocks. Very hot Cpu's though ( I own one of these)
(
Hot cores ... 99% ... can give very good results with SS,DI,LN2
Much better than the cooler cores.
Here in Athens,we have fair good availability (except E8500 in limited quantities).
Almost every week,we have new shippments...cause they sell like crazy.
and now the BAD NEWS
Over a sample of 20-30 cpu's (8400-8500) tested on air-cooling the last 2 weeks with a max Vcore of 1.5volt.
Almost all of them ... are loosing speed of 50-80Mhz within a couple of days testing.
It seems so far ... that they need a bit more Vcore to maintain their initial overclocked speed after a few days or week.
I am talking about Orthos testing primarily.
That's not a good sign.
We have kept some of these cpu's ...to see what they will do on their 2nd week of testing.
-
ALL FIXED
You missed this one
Just a screenshot in forumpost
No FM link
No resolution
No vga info
-
Temperature of the chilled "water" can be about -30\-35. I think such "water" can't be compared with normal water cooling system. And it can confuse another people if I select h2o cause of too high clocks for h2o. It's the same if you combine DI and LN2.
But if it's hard to do - ok. Thx for the replies...
In your case...since your chiller goes down @ -30C ... you'd better submit it as a single phase cooling.
-
No ...it's probably some kind of problem with the validator.
I checked previus scores,that were validated ok ... and now it shows them as incorrect.
Somebody must pm them...to check it.
-
A few comments from me ....
1)@hipro5
That was not a post-reply ... that was Desert Storm
2)@SF3D
I'm pleased to see a person that has the strength to admit when he's wrong & doesnt "afraid" to say sorry.
That's what defines a man from kids playin arround.
You have my credit for that.
3)@dinos22
I totally agree with you.
4)@richba5tard
I really expect more from you ... and not just a comment about tsan & SFD3 in this topic.
I know there must be some hard effort in the background of hwbot ... about making new rules and taking some hard decisions.
Dont loose focus & keep in mind ... that hwbot is a concept,an idea ... that is meaningless without the wide acceptance from us....the people of hwbot.
If you loose the pulse of people seeing things... you may end up loosing too many.
Ask the Team Leaders ... about their ideas and opinions ... before you end up with your new set of rules.
Maybe you and your crew are missing a different kind of aspect.
You still have my full support & trust ... and if there is anything i can do to help ... i'm here.
-
Sorry,maybe i didnt described it clearly.
I have 1867.00 submitted on 16/09/2007 and i am 3rd
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193
"Kszonek" has 1866.80 submitted on 17/10/2007 and he's 2nd
Can you please check this result ?http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673623
The total time of 15.5 sec with only 4.9GHZ ... is simply too good to be true.
There must be some kind of cheat or bug.
You can check all the other results for relevant scores...even from the same user.
Just a bump up ....
-
Can you please check this result ?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673623
The total time of 15.5 sec with only 4.9GHZ ... is simply too good to be true.
There must be some kind of cheat or bug.
You can check all the other results for relevant scores...even from the same user.
-
1st link are ok to me Hardware Rank: 3rd Pentium M 440 Celeron = bronze medal
2nd link too Hardware Rank: 2nd Pentium M 440 Celeron = silver medal
Sorry,maybe i didnt described it clearly.
I have 1867.00 submitted on 16/09/2007 and i am 3rd
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193
"Kszonek" has 1866.80 submitted on 17/10/2007 and he's 2nd
-
Please fix these results....
2nd place ... but bronze cup & points
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193
3rd place ... but silver cup & points
UP ...
-
Happy New Year ... to everybody.
My best wishes ... good health and happiness
Have fun tonight ... we'll bench again tomorrow
:celebration:
-
Please fix these results....
2nd place ... but bronze cup & points
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193
3rd place ... but silver cup & points
-
Hi,
please can you check this result:
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606860
I think the time is to fast, because I need ~41s and a lot of others 43-41 too, and he is 10 seconds faster with only a little bit more clock.
thx
Seewolf
This is pifast version 4.3
The result must be deleted.
-
FM link dead.
No resolution
No vga info
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642626
Just a screenshot in forumpost
No FM link
No resolution
No vga info
-
@Bwanasoft
The result below should be unblocked and moved to the correct category.
It has a valid FM link ... and the description (bot tags) in the forum post is correct.
It's a bot missmatch
-
This score looks like a regular FX5200 ... not a FX5200SE
Maybe i'm wrong.
Can some moderator ask for a gpu-z or rivatuner screenshot ?
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555009 - photo shows 7900GT & FM links shows 7600GS ... and the result is in 7900GTO section ???
You missed this one ?
Is this cheating?
in Submission & member moderation
Posted
You are kidding ... wright ?
The above entry-score has ZERO elements to prove a valid hwbot 2k1 result.
Only a link to forumpost,with a photo that doesnt proove anything.
A 2K1 photo where the tab score hides everything about the vga and analysis
An atitool tab ... that says nothing.
...and a cpuz tab of an opteron.