TASOS

Submission & member moderation · December 5, 2007

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593389 - no cpu proof

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637948 - no photo,dead FM link

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555006 - photo shows 7900GT & FM links shows 7600GS ... and the result is in 7900GTO section ???

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555009 - photo shows 7900GT & FM links shows 7600GS ... and the result is in 7900GTO section ???

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526606 - photo shows spi1M & FM link is dead.

Submission & member moderation · November 3, 2007

wPrime-32M

Section : Core 2 T7200

The results below are NOT T7200...(they are Core 2 4400)

User=Mauri

1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603576

date event user description
09 May 2007 12:50 created wPrime Benchmark v1.28 automatic submission by benchmark app

Description: cm geminii cooled 4400

User=bossdog

(example of submission in Wprime database ... http://www.wprime.net/score.cgi?id=9783

2)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635207

3)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635206

4)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626606

5)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625967

User=anonynous

(His own verification link http://www.wprime.net/score.cgi?id=5771

6)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603094

wPrime-1024M

Section : Core 2 T7200

User=Mauri

1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603577

date event user description
09 May 2007 12:50 created wPrime Benchmark v1.28 automatic submission by benchmark app

Description: cm geminii cooled 4400

Superpi-32M

Section : Core 2 T7200

User=Zaltan

1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595232

No image,no proof

date event user description
09 Apr 2007 07:09 created Zaltan manual online submission

09 Aug 2007 08:55 reported Undertaker reported by user due to lack of validation (No screenshot ! (link is dead))

10 Aug 2007 12:14 reported Undertaker reported by user due to lack of validation (no screenshot !)

28 Aug 2007 05:36 reported Undertaker reported by user due to lack of validation (Link to screenshot is dead...)

October 18, 2007

I believe that PCM Vantage should be added.

Submission & member moderation · October 11, 2007

Intel Celeron 733 into P-III 733 section

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626204

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626202

Submission & member moderation · October 9, 2007

How do i fix this ?

1)Delete the false entries from my profile.

2)Edit forum post description as "HD2900XT 512MB" ?

I just did that.

I believe everything is ok now.

Submission & member moderation · October 8, 2007

I have a HD2900XT 512MB.

The bot re-scanned old forum post results....and made new entry results as HD2900XT 1GB...(there was no 1GB versions back then).

Now i have some double scores with points in my profile

Half of them listed as HD2900XT 512MB (correct)

Half of them listed as HD2900XT 1GB (wrong)

How do i fix this ?

1)Delete the false entries from my profile.

2)Edit forum post description as "HD2900XT 512MB" ?

P.S.

I was wondering how i got 2-3 more cups and some points the past week ?

Submission & member moderation · September 27, 2007

ATI 9000 PRO into 9000 section

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=551129

26 Sep 2007 02:28 modified demiurg manually modified by team captain (demiurg) - reason: no reason given

Submission & member moderation · September 21, 2007

No FM link ... and the picture doesnt show the type of VGA.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643878

Submission & member moderation · September 20, 2007

That's probably a CF score .....

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648758

Thanks for editing so fast

Now i'd like my gold and points back

http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=2&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=Radeon+HD+2900+XT+%281224%29&numberOfVideocards=one&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1103&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

Submission & member moderation · September 20, 2007

That's probably a CF score .....

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648758

Submission & member moderation · September 19, 2007

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=579329 On a screenshot there is no proof that it really 478SOC, and break from competitors too big

There is a point here...yes.

If you decide to pull down the above score...maby you should check ALL the scores in his profile.

All are PcMark's ... everytime with different Celeron model ... and all of them uploaded manually on-line within 2 days.

No futuremark link in any of the scores.

http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=7349

September 16, 2007

You can read the existing topics or open a new topic in one of our local forums.

www.overclockers.gr

www.thelab.gr

www.hwbox.gr

It would be more easy to explain in our native language.

September 16, 2007

No you can't.

It's factory locked.

September 11, 2007

No problems at all for the motor ... just by chip-tuning it.

Just pick a well known product with full warranty.

http://www.mtm-online.de/en/index.php?nav=3&FZID=OCTAVIA2TDI77F

September 10, 2007

That's 19" BBS CH .... i love them

It has a lot more than just chip tuning.

If chip tuning equals a good air-cooling for pc's

Then my car is definetely on a single stage phase

September 10, 2007

Very good choice the Octavia...and nice colour pick.

I own a 06 GTI ... with a bit more than 300PS :woot:

Submission & member moderation · September 7, 2007

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643495 ' date=' http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641679 Links and descriptions are for Presler, results are in 3.4C Northwood category.[/quote']

Fixed by me.

I edited the entries and put the correct cpu.

*The submitted results (in the forum) are correct.

The bot seems to do the missmatch ?

Submission & member moderation · September 6, 2007

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588457
Prescott 2.8A in 2.8E category

This entry above has not been fixed.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642959

Bench run @ 640x480 16bit

Submission & member moderation · September 6, 2007

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571016 no verification screen,or link

I fixxed it my self.

I uploaded the verification picture.

edit

The verification image was at a previous forum i used for hwbot

The post was modified so the url was lost.

http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?postid=414556#post414556

Submission & member moderation · September 4, 2007

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588457

Prescott 2.8A in 2.8E category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627612

P4 Northwood 1.8@1.8 does 73sec pifast

Better score than a 1.8@3.1 GHZ

I need proof this is a valid hexus pifast version 4.1 result.

Submission & member moderation · August 7, 2007

Holly Molly ..... 0.63 spi 1M

And with a checksum validation

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632037

Does this guy have other results on the bot too ??

Submission & member moderation · March 1, 2007

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569900

OLD version of superpi without decimal digits

This score should be validated as 12.99

Submission & member moderation · February 16, 2007

1)This result is from an ATI 9000 PRO

It shows clearly in this photo

http://images.people.overclockers.ru/71871.jpg

It also has a wrong futuremark link.

The correct one is below

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8966756

2)This score is correct

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=511147

But to be valid,please add the following Forum post

http://www.overclocking-masters.com/forum/hwbot-Classement-Super-PI-1M,p51914.htm#p51914

Screnshot

http://112233445566.free.fr/PM740/22.281.jpg

Edit please

Thanks

Submission & member moderation · February 15, 2007

Some more links for editing....

1)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559983

Verified by a moderator ....by mistake i believe.

The score belongs to a P4 3.0 'E'

2)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559973

This screenshot can't verify the result. (just a clockgen picture) ??

It could be any kind of cpu.

Submission & member moderation · February 15, 2007

Now they are

Thanks

Sign In

TASOS

Posts

Joined

Last visited

Days Won

Content Type

Profiles

Forums

Events

Blogs

Posts posted by TASOS

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

PCMARK Vantage

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Core 2 Duo 6750 Multiplier

Core 2 Duo 6750 Multiplier

Which car do you drive?

Which car do you drive?

Which car do you drive?

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

Wrong Result

HWBOT

Browse

Activity