TASOS
-
Posts
1523 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
36
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by TASOS
-
-
Then the score belongs to the 430 category, if it's a 430.
Yes i agree.
I am sure i had submitted my score at Celeron M430 category ... and i was in 1st place (with PcCI2iminal) at same frequency.
Someone from the moderators team must have mooved my submission at Celeron M420 category.
-
wanting to know how a multiplier of 13x is possible
We are talking about year 2006 !
Celeron M430
ES cpu ... 7553A743 QKIS
http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/QK/QKIS.html
Early version of cpu-z didnt fully recognized it.
It's an M430 that's why it reports 1.73Ghz and 13X multi.
-
Can you change the status to blocked and not deleted ... so i can inspect my entry ?
-
Can you please make visible (for me) the following blocked score ?
Cause i cant see it ... it's deleted.
Hello, An hwbot crew member, demiurg, has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has been marked as 'impossible score at given settings, possible bug or other'. This was the reason the user gave:Multiplier 13? How can it be? You can view your result here: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570195 -
Ticket ID: 599
Priority: Medium
Win XP SP3\r\nIE 7\r\n\r\nI need to refresh 3-4 times to open the home page.\r\nhttp://img38.imageshack.us/i/hwbotproblem1.jpg/\r\n\r\nForum topics look like this.\r\nhttp://img34.imageshack.us/i/hwbotproblem2.jpg/
-
Below it's an old score of mine with the same cpu.
Notice that the time between loops is not always @2 sec each.
-
then why ask about it? this is about VGA which can not do default...
I asked again,because you wrote above "we have to make it general"
and also my result is still blocked ... even though my FM link is valid.
-
I don't agree.
You dont agree about rules beeing first ?
or is it something else you mean ?
-
we have to make it general or not at all; not per VGA card basis
I thought it was clear after i pointed some facts earlier ... that the 32MB TNT2's ... are legal and benched default the 2k1
-
how is it not fixed?
step1: is the score suspicious ?
Sorry but ... what you mention is at least step-4
The 1st step is about rules for everybody.
Otherwise ... i can point you about 600 results non-suspicious to unblock or un-erase.
-
There is a poll in the private section going on, the outcome will decide whether we make an exception for ancient videocards in 3DMark01 or not.
Poll about the 32MB versions of TNT2 ???
I'm talking about the specific card only.
-
Any news ?
-
This one ... is not fixed.
2)2k3 FX5600XThttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568284
No ORB link,no resolution,no vga specs...nothing at all.
-
1)2k1 FX5600XT
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604547
From the ORB link
Z-Buffer Depth @16bit
2)2k3 FX5600XT
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568284
No ORB link,no resolution,no vga specs...nothing at all.
-
Happy Birthday RB
-
Okay, we got all information and opinions gathered, let's try and work out a solution now ;-)
One thing for sure ... is that the scores from 32MB TNT2 must get unblocked.
-
I believe things are clear enough.
1st
You need a 32MB VGA to run 2k1 properly (minimum requirments).
*VGA's with less than 32MB memory could produce non reliable scores.
2nd
You have to run the bench with compressed textures or 32bit textures (if there's a hardware limitation).
-
I dont want to quote anyone in this thread ... for obvious reasons.
Just take a minute and read again about default settings and minimum requirements of 3DMark2001SE
-
ok
thanks
-
This entry
"); var _hwbcss = "http://hwbot.org/css/style.external.custom.css"; var _hwb = _hwb || []; _hwb.push(['type= 9.862s - Core i7 920@4200MHz']); _hwb.push(['params=%2$s']); _hwb.push([_hwbtarget]); (function() { var hwbex = document.createElement('script'); hwbex.type = 'text/javascript'; hwbex.async = true; hwbex.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://') + 'hwbot.org/js/exf2.js'; var s = document.getElementById(_hwbtarget); s.parentNode.insertBefore(hwbex, s); })();
http://www.overclockers.gr/vbull/showpost.php?p=456875&postcount=315
Results as
Athlon 64 4200+ X2 BrisbaneWhy is this happening ?
-
@ TASOS - Team moderators may not reverse a block, because it has already been reviewed/moderated by a hwbot crew member. The alert at least lets you know a score has been moderated.
I didnt ask to have the ability of unblocking a score.
I just want to have a chance to see ... what's all about.
When an e-mail of a blocked score comes ... and i open the link and there's nothing i can see and have an opinion.... then it's useless.
-
We still have an issue about blocked scores.
When the Team Moderators cant see those "blocked scores" ... they cant take part.
What's the meaning of emailing the Team Moderators then ?
I have wrote the same thing a few times before.
Make these scores vissible.
-
Consider also ... the fact,that we are comparing (P35+DDR2@2T) vs (X48+DDR3@1T ... and quite aggresive subtimings).
-
Hm, and now?
ok
I can see it now.
Blocked cpu-z submission
in Submission & member moderation
Posted
Thank you.
Can i ask for one more thing please ?
The same screenshot was also used (back then) for my spi 1M submission.
Which i cant find anywhere.
Can somebody look what happened to that entry ?
Bellow is a chart of my submitted scores at 31/12/2007 with this Celly.