Antinomy

Strange, maybe this needs some more investigation for the Pro series. What PCB ver and BIOS have you been using? CPU has a free multi?

Also they have a 5-bit FID meaning work fine with multi over 12,5. I've got 8RDA+ Pro and 8RDA3+ Pro. 8RDA6+ Pro is the same with additional controllers (SATA AFAIK).

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/mag_x570_tomahawk_wifi_ms_7c84/

A CPU-Z txt report file would be useful on this one. Thank you for clarification, I indeed messed up LPDDR3 with DDR3L. Again, we need txt reports from such systems to help with reporting this bug to CPU-Z author. I could contact Franck on this one.

Nope. Not exactly. LPDDR3 standard permits use of different data widths but in case of general notebooks it's not quite so. Generally speaking DDR3L or LPDDR3 SO-DIMM module is simply one that can work at 1.35V. Usual DDR3 SO-DIMMs work at 1.5V. So generally speaking any DDR3L module will work in DDR3 environment and vice versa, a DDR3 SO-DIMM that works stable at 1.35V will work in DDR3L system. Thus speaking, I don't think it's necessary to make a separate category for them especially since CPU-Z doesn't tell them from regular ones. I'm open for arguments and opinions though.

Excellent score, Mr. Trololo ))

Fixed your sub. It was hilarious though :D

GPU clock says it's 3470.

Nice to see you back, @klopcha

Already here. Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/extensa_2519/

Already here: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/lnvnb161216/ One hell of a name. Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/a6_9225/

Don't see a thread on this case but current Aquamark wrapper doesn't work on old GPUs. Tested on Prosavage DDR, SiS 315 integrated and Mirage. The benchmark itself works as usual. The wrapper shows a black screen for a second after you hit the run button and immediately pops back to main screen. Systeminfo, priority and the rest don't help with this one. 315.zip is SiS 651 chipset. Aquamark.zip is SiS 661 chipset. Aquamark3.zip 315.zip

But not benchmark's

Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x11scz_f/

It's pretty much the same as changing DirectX which also affects 3DMark but is legal because you don't touch the benchmark itself. But if you replace the audio encoder dll in PCMark, this would be illegal as it is part of the benchmark. Excellent tweak and thanks for sharing!!!

Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/nb116/

Excellent, first place!

Excellent work, Nikolay! )

Nailed it! Congratulations, Bones!

Excellent score, Doc!

Old school power. Well done!

You're right, looks like SS. Fine for me. But you should add a description that it's an old result so everyone knows. There's enough sandbaggers who can start arguing.

Hey, fella, nice score. But new rules require using CPU-Z 1.91 or newer. Don't forget to update for next scores. Cheers!

added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/fm2a78_pro4_plus/

So? You should stop cussing and do your homework. Integrated chips are fun because they're hard. You need to know some advanced stuff to show good results. It's not a thing for newbies. Uchi matchast' and good luck.