Antinomy

https://valid.x86.fr/gzixlx So finally Franck released a beta with this fix. I've sent him feedback and I hope it'll get into stable release as well. If anyone's interested I also have photo of a de-lidded CPU of this type sent by ultra_code. You can clearly see Toledo die compared to much smaller San Diego.

No. San Diego is a single-core die. The E6 isn't, it's a cut-off dual-core die. I'll post a copy of my letter to author of CPU-Z. I've just sent him another e-mail as a reminder. Sometimes he agrees to apply fixes but doesn't do it.

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/g41fbal2/

Raptor benching Raptor after all these years.

What is OM? 0,11um tech. proc?

Congratulations, TAGG! Do you think the 815 is better? OPB thought that 808 is the one to go for.

Outstanding score, congratulations!

Wow, Kazakhstan overclocking is not dead. ? Nice score!

Yes. Which one exactly depends on HW and benchmark.

Very nice! But I'm sure you can do even better.

Since I'm not the only one pissed off. @liq_met, some more false, minor or reports without a proper description and you'll be doing homework for quite some time.

Congratulations! Good to see someone finally benchmarking again instead of ranting.

I totally agree. It's the VIA 691 chipset, it doesn't support FSB133 at all. You can see 66/100 silk print on the PCB. Feel free to move it.

So close! Congratulations, excellent score.

Very nice! Could you run AIDA to check memory read/write/latency?

Crazy CPU! What mods have been used for this result?

Do you know what OVERclocking is? ))

This one hasn't been confirmed to have EMT64. Haven't seen a single result with it too. Only SL7QB and SL7Q8 are fully capable of running 64-bit OS. https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/running-win10-by-intel-s478-cpu-now-and-maybe-older-cpu-in-the-future.81451/page-5#post-1637849

@windwithmehi! Any chances to see your old MoBo, CPU, memory reviews from s939, AM2, 775 era? Most links are dead of without screenshots.

Any chances to see a stand-alone and preferrably WinXP-compatible RAMDisk implementation? Would really like to compare your techniques to classic ones.

I don't use HWinfo usually. CPU-Z works fine and it's good enough for me. But yeah, I suppose some timers break that are used by some utilities.

That's exactly why I disclosed it. I didn't invent this trick, learned it years ago from one Russian BIOS guru.

Because this BIOS options works with EIST and it's blocked on Celeron CPUs. BTW, any interesting timings available through Intel Integrator toolkit on your Bad Axe?

You say you want a revolution? Do you see anything strange over here? Now as you see, 478 adapters are pretty much useless for this competition. ?