Jump to content

Antinomy

Crew
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Antinomy

  1. Very nice, Mr. Scott! The way it's meant to be clocked.
  2. Antinomy replied to Strunkenbold's post in a topic in Support
    Thanks, Frank. I do clean up the database when I have free time (almost never that is ) but I definitely can't see everything. Strunkenbold, I usually clean them one category by one. Starting from old school and moving to the more recent ones. Better small fixes per week than giant fixes per ..never
  3. Antinomy replied to Strunkenbold's post in a topic in Support
    The better way is to compile a list of such bugs for a certain CPU family and send to F. Delattre (author of CPU-Z). You can post here, I'll think what can be done with it.
  4. Antinomy replied to Strunkenbold's post in a topic in Support
    O.K., moved all CPUs to their appropriate sockets. Renamed Core-based CPUs. I don't agree renaming LV/ULV Pentium M's because the way it's now is more common and like it is on intel.com. As for adding revisions to Celeron M 3xx/Pentium M 7x5 I remember it being a tricky one. Will read datasheets on what the differences are besides stepping. Feel free to poke me from time to time
  5. Antinomy replied to Blackbolt's post in a topic in Support
    Well, it's already there: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5272/
  6. gigioracing, both 09E0h and 1618 already in DB. added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/309e/ Vermut3, http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/dg35ec/ AMDsempron140, can't find the ID string of your tablet in the database. Will ask Massman.
  7. Antinomy replied to havli's post in a topic in Support
    added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ax8/
  8. Antinomy replied to Sduneman3's post in a topic in Support
    added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/09e0h/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/0y1057/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/c440gx+/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/s2881/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/kfn32-d_sli/
  9. Antinomy replied to Massman's post in a topic in Old School
    Please, update 3D01 ranking - I've fixed CPU model for xtreme_ice's submissions.
  10. Antinomy replied to Massman's post in a topic in Old School
    Yep! I think Socket 8, Socket 603/604 would be nice as well. Maybe add one of the wPrime for some multisocket statistics.
  11. lame question - how did my amount of points change by a half?
  12. Antinomy replied to atisoc0936's post in a topic in Support
    added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/lancer_5a6/
  13. Antinomy replied to max1024's post in a topic in Support
    Я говорю по-русски, знаю, что он говорит по-русски - Why not?
  14. Massman, you said that making a new point algorithm would need effort whereas using the same one but "categorized by user account type". What can you say about a point algorithm categorized by hardware type? Same points, but a ranking that counts only hardware older than socket T (775) for example? You've already rolled you charts with "most gold cups, most points in certain socket" so this isn't much different from your charts. Well, I have a thought on that one but I hope Massman can clarify this case.
  15. Maybe I've got you wrong about the competition. And being realistic another ranking is over the top. Too many of them as for me, I only use the hardware masters one. A competition OTOH: 1) is realistic to implement 2) inspire users to achieve new results 3) might bring some new guys to old hardware As for the competition - 478/939 are very popular and GF5 is of a corresponding era to them. Restrictions are pretty loose, I don't see a reason to try involving everyone. 2801 cap is for low clock challenge - it's about how we tweak the system and timings and it's a skill less common than cranking the voltage and pushing the clocks. An opportunity to improve our skills and learn something new. Anyway thank you for inspiring all this. Will see how it turns out. Advices appreciated.
  16. Antinomy replied to max1024's post in a topic in Support
    Для карт, отличающихся только объёмом памяти, новые категории больше не создаются - добавляй результаты в 6800 Ultra 256MB.
  17. Antinomy replied to atisoc0936's post in a topic in Support
    Need the model for Sony VAIO. Try running Aquamark, it's wrapper shows the model. And the're no link to Lenovo LANCER. added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/m4n78/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/n56jn/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ga-p41t-d3/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/q2432a/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/0yxxjj/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/fjnbb10/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/m4n78_se/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/0k13wn/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/je41-mv/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/0nx907/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x451ma/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x45u/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/2212/
  18. added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/diskproduct/850_evo_series/
  19. Such discussions have already taken place with introduction of rev. 3. We have globals points and hardware points. Global points are meant to be like this and always were. You should remember how ORB Hall of Fame looked like back then. Every time a new CPU hit the market it was guys like FUGGER, Shamino and others who ripped the rankings. They runned Vapochill/LN2 cooled chips like the newly announced Thoroughbred-B, P4 3.0, P4 XE, AMD Hammer, FX-55/57 and so on. I'm sure you didn't see "new members , with current gen systems , even high-end" in ORB's top10. Because it was about lots of tweaking, h/w modifications, cooling and ... top grade just released hardware. This is what global rankings are about - a point-rewarded representation of ORB HoF. OTOH we have hardware points. Yet again, it does rely on having the top CPU for high-end GPU benching (look at 12 just for example with his nice Haswell-E results). But low-end GPUs and 2D CPUs rely mostly on your skills and cooling. Globals are easy come easy go points. You have to work really hard to stay high in the rankings. What I see is members are more complaining about "why do I have high-end hardware and can't have many points easily?". Go get some obscure or rare hardware, bench it and you'll have easy points, but a few. Work hard and you'll have global points with your hardware but they'll last till the next release. It's how it always have worked. Obscure or old school categories don't rely on having "special hardware" and this is the way I always point to such members. No easy points on HWBot As for those who got the hardware from a store or for a review - they'll have their points for say a week and will be moved out by the Pros who have skills and equipment for modding, cooling and running it in their high-end test bed. History will cycle here.
  20. It's a team work, not only mine Fix a typo, please:
  21. Antinomy replied to delly's post in a topic in Support
    added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/a8_7650k/
  22. Antinomy replied to delly's post in a topic in Support
    added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/a68hm-p33/
  23. Antinomy replied to Rasparthe's post in a topic in Support
    added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p4vga/
  24. Added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p7h55-m_le/