Antinomy

Maybe I've got you wrong about the competition. And being realistic another ranking is over the top. Too many of them as for me, I only use the hardware masters one. A competition OTOH: 1) is realistic to implement 2) inspire users to achieve new results 3) might bring some new guys to old hardware As for the competition - 478/939 are very popular and GF5 is of a corresponding era to them. Restrictions are pretty loose, I don't see a reason to try involving everyone. 2801 cap is for low clock challenge - it's about how we tweak the system and timings and it's a skill less common than cranking the voltage and pushing the clocks. An opportunity to improve our skills and learn something new. Anyway thank you for inspiring all this. Will see how it turns out. Advices appreciated.

Для карт, отличающихся только объёмом памяти, новые категории больше не создаются - добавляй результаты в 6800 Ultra 256MB.

Need the model for Sony VAIO. Try running Aquamark, it's wrapper shows the model. And the're no link to Lenovo LANCER. added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/m4n78/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/n56jn/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ga-p41t-d3/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/q2432a/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/0yxxjj/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/fjnbb10/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/m4n78_se/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/0k13wn/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/je41-mv/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/0nx907/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x451ma/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x45u/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/2212/

added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/diskproduct/850_evo_series/

Such discussions have already taken place with introduction of rev. 3. We have globals points and hardware points. Global points are meant to be like this and always were. You should remember how ORB Hall of Fame looked like back then. Every time a new CPU hit the market it was guys like FUGGER, Shamino and others who ripped the rankings. They runned Vapochill/LN2 cooled chips like the newly announced Thoroughbred-B, P4 3.0, P4 XE, AMD Hammer, FX-55/57 and so on. I'm sure you didn't see "new members , with current gen systems , even high-end" in ORB's top10. Because it was about lots of tweaking, h/w modifications, cooling and ... top grade just released hardware. This is what global rankings are about - a point-rewarded representation of ORB HoF. OTOH we have hardware points. Yet again, it does rely on having the top CPU for high-end GPU benching (look at 12 just for example with his nice Haswell-E results). But low-end GPUs and 2D CPUs rely mostly on your skills and cooling. Globals are easy come easy go points. You have to work really hard to stay high in the rankings. What I see is members are more complaining about "why do I have high-end hardware and can't have many points easily?". Go get some obscure or rare hardware, bench it and you'll have easy points, but a few. Work hard and you'll have global points with your hardware but they'll last till the next release. It's how it always have worked. Obscure or old school categories don't rely on having "special hardware" and this is the way I always point to such members. No easy points on HWBot As for those who got the hardware from a store or for a review - they'll have their points for say a week and will be moved out by the Pros who have skills and equipment for modding, cooling and running it in their high-end test bed. History will cycle here.

It's a team work, not only mine Fix a typo, please:

added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/a8_7650k/

added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/a68hm-p33/

added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p4vga/

Added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p7h55-m_le/

added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/easynote_lm85/

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/micronics_c400/

What device do you run? Seems like it's not in the database. Need a link to the specs so I can add it.

Fixed them

AMDsempron140, added : http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/a20_1200mhz/

Added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x453ma/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/lenovo_b50-70/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ms-aa5d1/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/e520/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/30a4/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/169b/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/0578a97/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x553ma/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/0n6705/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/z97-d3h/ Didn't add Sony VAIO - need notebook model. You can run HWBot's Aquamark, it's able to detect Sony's board model.

gigioracing, added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/09f0h/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/fq965m/

Added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/123-cd-e635-kr/

Added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/361a/

added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/lancer_4a6/

added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/sy-6be+/

Thanks guys

Thank you

I remember looking at your records back then. I respect your opinion a lot and would be glad to learn something new.

TASOS, to answer your questions one by one. Well, both are right here. He could post a link to the discussion of this CPU and the moderators can ask me to clarify details. All in all it was Karl who added it. You can see M119B566 marking. The second digit is the year (2001), the next two - week, 19. If we talk about 800MHz ES in general, we have 14th and 20th weeks of 2000 and I can check mine to make a three of them. CPUID, brand ID and maybe even platform ID are strange. Unknown sample with same specs as P4 800MHz. Kind of unique. I have a P4 0.8GHz but didn't have time to run the test. And didn't want to compete with Frank this time Glad you're done with the rest, keep calm fellas. P.S. thank you, Mr. Scott