Antinomy
-
Posts
1987 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
53
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Antinomy
-
-
11 hours ago, Sparks.nl said:
Please note that there was nothing stated here about processors.
Really?
11 hours ago, Sparks.nl said:Only use processors using socket AM2, AM2+ socket
I'll put it very simple for you:
11 hours ago, Sparks.nl said:Taking this as a reference (for example) a Phenom II X2 550BE cpu has the exact same architecture as the X4 940BE.
O.K. then show me a X4 940BE valid with DDR3 and we'll keep on talking.
- 2
-
15 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:
It's done simply because in other way there would be garbage results in the global leaderboards submitted by the same person multiple times.
Well, there's that little company UL that doesn't seem to have such a problem.
So I've thrown my money for nothing...19 minutes ago, Mr.Scott said:Omit the link then. I mean, is it really needed?
I suppose the initial idea was to validate everything that can be validated. -
2 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:
Just delete the valid link requirement in the comp.
It's not just about the comp, all subs require valid links. And as I see, you can only make one link public at a time. So for 20 subs on different cards you need like what, 20 keys? So much for their HWBot support.
-
@Leeghoofd, I've posted two Superposition results under my profile and now the first link is dead. I see it in my profile but it's unpublished. And I can't see a way to publish them both, only one. Could you clear out, how exactly do I provide a validation link for each submission?
TIA. -
-
16 hours ago, max1024 said:
There the Story
Where did you buy the memory?
-
6 minutes ago, TheRealKiwi said:
or because other CPU-Z version?
This one.
-
On 9/8/2021 at 1:49 AM, TheRealKiwi said:
Interesting to see that your A8N-SLI doesn't have a 1T bug?
Yep, I've checked the FAQ for these boards, the Premium indeed has this bug fixed.
-
On 9/8/2021 at 1:49 AM, TheRealKiwi said:
It seems to be very common that around 235/240+ FSB cannot run stably at 1T, like my board.
IIRC, there was a newer rev and Premium might be of the latter, that has this fixed.
- 2
-
Nice clocks! How much clocks did you gain from epower?
-
Very nice! More good scores to IGP, more fun!
-
Very nice setup!
- 1
-
Excellent score, congratulations!
- 1
-
On 9/5/2021 at 3:25 AM, Splave said:
What do you guys say about when you can finish a threaded benchmark, and then cpuz crashes your score? Or 5 minutes of pi then cpuz wont open? How is that fair to the bencher that is doing all the tweaks and days of pretesting to be killed by the validation software?
We're all equal in this. But I like your point - yes, after time CPU-Z has become more stressful than benchmarks themself, which is ridiculous. And if alternative verifications apps will be approved (like HWinfo, BM) it would give a nice opportunity to squeeze some more.
On 9/4/2021 at 8:38 PM, Leeghoofd said:The Corsair compo could have been so much more, it has a strong competitive field of our community members, but nearly no newcomers. You should have seen the reactions on the Discord channels when you posted the placeholder.
You know what happens if you'll try to take your daily driver to a drag racing? Same thing. Like one said,
On 9/4/2021 at 6:40 PM, Leeghoofd said:Life has rules
I can't see how a general purpose car could or should compete with a custom racing build. Same thing for overclocking.
On 9/4/2021 at 6:40 PM, Leeghoofd said:Running a game benchmark might make it more interesting, but we need to rely on raw clocks instead of lowering graphical image quality or other nifty software hacks to boost the ouput score.
Aquamark is a game benchmark precisely (ever heard of Aquanox?).
On 9/4/2021 at 6:40 PM, Leeghoofd said:Game benchmarks could be comparable what the gamers run daily, they can compare their setups to ours.
That's the whole point and goal of what Futuremark/UL are doing for more than 20 years.
On 9/4/2021 at 6:40 PM, Leeghoofd said:I'm a Patron, who else is supporting Mat's great work?
If I didn't start with only problems to get, I suppose I'd be one.
On 9/4/2021 at 6:40 PM, Leeghoofd said:I think the rules set has moved along quite well and are as easy as it gets. If you can't get the hang of it, this is not for you.
Yep, if only we had a place where we can just read them, that would be lovely. Usually it's some here and there and some you need to figure out on your own and new benchmarks that have their own new rules. And after you're done, a year has past and you need to start all over again because rules have changed and there a bunch of new benchmarks. Don't get me wrong - the rules are good. But the way they're composed is hard to get into them. I suppose I've asked around ten times about different rules and benchmarks. And that it I don't consider myself dumb and I've read the rules page more than once before asking each time.
I suggest we should narrow the conversation and not bring all the stuff here, just take one question at a time.- 3
- 1
-
On 8/27/2021 at 12:19 PM, Dry_Ice777 said:
Camellia_JL
- 1
-
2 hours ago, ludek said:
Do you want me to check some things on these boards/CPUs?
Try setting 5-6x multi and pus FSB to the max. Try 1M stability and push over 250. Check different CPUs, BIOS, memory, anything that helps get over 250. That's one of the main goals. You are welcome to the Discord channel (link in the first post) for details.
- 1
-
8 hours ago, Tzk said:
All this wouldn't be possible without the overclocking elders (OskarWu, Tictac, Polygon) which did the groundwork for this. Also the openness of recent socket 462 overclocking and sharing all findings and infos was key. So a true team effort
Completely agree. As I said, I believe it's now or never to figure out this platform.
8 hours ago, Tzk said:I also believe there is more to gain, especially on 1:1 dualchannel. I'm still stuck at 263Mhz for 32M runs.
Very true.
- 1
-
Отличный результат!
- 1
-
Excellent score! Any specific settings to make this happen or just volts?
- 1
-
Excellent score! Need more CPU powa
-
6 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:
check topic hardware sharing
No, I'm not talking about sharing rules, but team cup ones. For example, on a joint bench session you can take 10 P4 3.0 Prescott CPUs and make submissions using 2-3 best of them.
But in team cup the submissions should be made with different hardware categories, right? Like you can't use two P4 3.0 but can use 3.0 and 3.2 CPUs. This one isn't represented. -
12 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:
Correct... subplatform can be the same if you do team sessions, but provide ample proof of this...
Would be very nice to have both written in team cup rules in the future. If it wasn't for my teammate, I wouldn't remember this.
-
@Leeghoofd, are old team cup rules applied: submissions must use different hardware - CPUs for CPU stages and GPU for GPU stages? So 2 results with P4 3.0 Prescott not allowed for wPrime for example?
-
Excellent score! Looks like you've done your homework well. GPU is very nice.
- 1
some bios and mans for old school mobos
in Old School
Posted
I've sorted out most of my datasheets. Here's some nice VIA package:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tGgb4Qpt74xXC6u522FBY0nSmA9ur0Ur/view?usp=sharing