Demac

You can use Precisionx from evga software.

Nicely done.Great score!

What's the brand of this card(maybe a club3d)? Or it is just amd reference?

That' the gpu score you're looking at. gpu->1518 cpu->11835.

Because it gain more from gpu score. According to my test i didn't gain much from playing at 4.5g the cpu.

Nice score.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2930385_demac_superpi___32m_a6_6420k_14min_10sec_375ms/

Thank you, i saw 7600+ but didnt save it. I didn't use pscheck.

How much volt for igpu?

Nice job Ronaldo.

Thank you man. Congrats to you as well for finished 3rd. Have a nice trip to Taipei.

1.70 vmem,can do cl9 at these volts but not benchable though.i will try them on ln2 for sure. Kingston 2666c13 retail ftw!!!

Oh lets take for expample then Doc`s score 2890 graphics score with 1700 core then and please redo your whole thinking again man... you know because you tested that a normal 2100 mhz run should be around 3030 points overall test.If you do not want to admit it then it is your problem man. I will not stay here and try to become even more petty trying to prove the obvious.It's a real bummer though seeing you react like that really... Good luck to you and all the other guys for the rest of the comp...I'm gone do my best in the remaining stages.

No Phil i think you are wrong here.I have uploaded 4 results in FS two not bugged and two bugged all at the same clocks.It seems to me that the bug happens due to high voltage and relatively low temp.For me when i run at -160 no bug occurs but when i start the GT1 at -150 the thing at my video happens.Also i have plenty of verification links and screenshots that i have not uploaded (they are at staff's disposal at any time) that have only one subtest bugged and it was due to artifacting and not rendering the correct amount of pixels at the specific subtest.And yes these runs are of course frequency related because there are same pixels left for rendering so the higher the gpu clocks the higher the score.I had no intention of uploading any bugged run untli i saw FK uploading his and i clearly stated that in my opinion it is bugged (thus and the video).My 2c and i have nothing personal with you guys at all,on the contrary you helped me HUGELLY for the bios to run Catzilla efficiently!!!

I have posted my best so far non buuged run... Just for the mods to see the huge difference.If i can get any better until the end of the stage i will post back.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2823022_dancop_3dmark___fire_strike_geforce_gtx_titan_x_21301_marks using the latest firestrike version+ the latest Sys Info gives you the lod message. Dancop's result for compare. Also if i post a 3700+ result will it be accepted.If yes i will...

ok i think i have to take position since i have been running "buggy" xtu here is a 1864 run with cpu-z mem tab and gtl open (at that moment i thought that only the 3000c10 mem would be considered suspicious of me...)if you see anything buggy please let me know to change it in my next runs... attached also a 1869 (<1870 not bugged right?) that the olny difference with the video one is that i have closed cpu-z and gtl (duh) and that i have run xtu at 640x480 (xtu folder\binnaries\right click properties at p95.exe\compatibility (also compatibility for xp sp2 is nice) also please take notice that you can get a nice boost if you have your prefetch-superfetch parameters right and know how to use them and also take some time to test wich ramdisk gives you better score.Core parking settings and power options can give you a couple of points too. Please no offence and nothing personal here but i just wanted to make my case clear since some people think the comp is unjust or anything

How come at the time of the screenshot xtu is reporting eist (or slow mode) enabled (low orange line),while it says 4500 right next to it and 4507 at cpu-z.Don't these three reporting have to be on par?

Oh boy i had a gigabyte z77 that could not post past code 79 (internal device initialization) and it never booted again. Bios flashing or hard flashing did not do absolutely nothing. Out of nowhere without too much oc or something just doing some low clock runs. I hope that is not your issue man.

wow great run mate.

But the verification link sometimes shows us the cheats. Then i can submit my 50k with sempron. Moose lets begin..!

Yeap even for 6.1 points. Why measurement time error?

Now its for any score and especially for top 20

Maybe you should explain it to any moderator, cause i think it is not legal.

Is it possible to achieve 70p/s at webpage subtest with legal tweaks?