Sweet

un saludo para ambos, Ximi y Nicolás, cualquier problema me consultan

And under ivestigation by all staff. We can not let anything happen again, sorry Denys

Ahhh, I thought you were asking something I did not understand, sorry I was looking at that and there's something ....maybe another new tweak

I dont understand this Steve, What do you want to ask ?

Yes Steve these values ​​seem very accurate within the microprocessors that I used.

Gracias, danke, thanks, grazie, Io parlo tutte le lingue ma, mi parla solo spagnolo Es un buen principio, y creo que un punto de partida para una mejor relación entre ustedes, los dos son muy buenos overclockers y a su vez , les gusta este juego., además son compatriotas. Cuando tengan discrepancias o dudas sobre una bench solo reportenlo a los moderadores, nosotros damos el veredicto final y listo, en principio todos nos podemos equivocar en un benchmark, a mi me pasa actualmente quizás por ansiedad (no quiero rsetear otra vez la pc., como dice zupernico). Tanto el Sr. Ximi como el Sr. zupernico son buenos overclockers, así que les pido que el tema quede zanjado (cerrado) acá o les cierro las cuentas personales en el B.B.V.A , yo trabajo allí Un abrazo a ambos y por favor tema terminado, tanto en este foro como en el resto de los foros que comparten. Sw Nota: Christian Ney sabe español :nana:

Guys take it easy, please. Spanish: tomenlo con calma muchachos , no es necesario esto si lo piensan seriamente, es solamente un juego un lindo juego , donde generalmente hacemos amigos, no enemigos. Ximi, por favor, a cada submisión tuya agregale las fotos de cada equipo , porque tu estas en la categoría entusiasta y éstas son obligatorias. zupernico. no es necesario que hagas público el problema, se puede hablar por MSN o facebook. y al menos llegar aun pacto de no agresión entre ustedes. Sé que el overclocking es competitivo, pero no para llegar al nivel de agredirse. Un abrazo a ambos Nota: Ximi si vos no me pasas los links , yo no sé cuales son las submisiones bloqueadas;)

Done , add in the first post

Show the links, please

Sorry, my faul, correct now Edit: completely updated the first post http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=59009 Thanks to SteveRo - borandi - Pro - Leeghoofd - Moose - zafiropo and GENiEBEN by your help :ws: Ps: and till tomorrow, my wife call me for dinner

Thanks so much Steve i update first post with this now

Yes Steve Please Can you write correctly this in order that I edit the first post ? or any Guy with good writing in English ? In spanish few ones are going to understand it Thanks so much Better , much better, Meanwhile, the previous stays in functions from this night, night for me, until the wrapper are ready. Thanks by your clarification GEN, so shortly we will have unless problem Edit: Updated First post,

Please if my writing is incorrect in english let me know, to fix

@borandi Tonight I edit the first post of this thread and add the list, as the comments of Pro Edit: and this

Clear, in all submission of PcMark05, must be all the subtests run with each final results, so, use result .txt file in the screen like a ORB link, both are valid. Always on the screen or the ORB link, everyone should be able to see the final score of each subtest. Mandatory For Top 20 Global link ORB is mandatory

And now too, any Global Top 20 must have a link thats ORB is mandatory, always. Imho Is necessary if you can see all subtest on screen ? But not a bad idea, it costs nothing to put the link to the ORB in all submissions of PcMark Yes sure

Good morning (or afternoon for you Steve) Well ... Pro ​​old Master of PCMark, more correctly can answer all questions, and maybe I (like overclocker or almost) to try to find out as you do for great scores, it's like turning back the clock and start squeezing Hardware. Again, all together will do overclock With This benchmark, I have lucky because you and I.M.O.G have sold your acards Welcome Pro at this thread !!!

Not by now, maybe in the future, wait a few days by this. we being defined at this time the massive increase in this subtest (transp win) We are defining the many gray areas that have the PCMark, which is totally unsafe. But if you consider that a hack usstes to improve the final result (which is not allowed) and also the final score is very bulky for hardware that you have used, better remove. You SteveRo and I.M.O.G like S_A_V and anothers guys who were the best in this benchmark, by the hardware used, know what is right or wrong. you are the real Master of PCMark. You were the ones who always defended the continuation of this benchmark You know much more than me on this topic (always inside overclocking) I've learned to run this benchmark with cold, and another stuff, thanks to you, I.M.O.G and S_A_V Btw. we have removed the scores from the day 19.10.2012 which use the Text edit Tweak (cheat with script w/ .rft file in blanck ) only, try other than validated those ridiculous scores that were uploaded since that day, scores greater than 100,000 marks with microprocessor stock. That's totally ridiculous and difficult to defend by those who use the tweaks to trick overclockers.

Hi Steve, I.M.O.G is right in this topic, but by now change Hdd is allowed. I think it will soon be on the front page and in the rules -only Massman can do that-, we just need to define whether or not F2D is allowed like amd raid eXpert Guys imo, we have to stop this hack or will be removed literally the benchmark points and cups, PCMark05 could stop being a benchmark with which we can make overclocking. By the way, move the mouse so crazy is not allowed, you just have to move smoothly, in nvidia graphic cards, and mouse with ball is not allowed

Only the last 72 Hrs., the rest with help the others moderators, thats a hard work

You are wrong in this point, I belong to moderation staff since 2010 september, and my nick is a cheat too. (I have much character and personality) Pro is a judge, like Knopflerbruce said in previous post., youngpro is what we tell everyone its a tweak is illegal or not. the rest of us are moderators result in this benchmark and the rest benchmarks I got to work, because surely had more free time than other moderators, any of the staff can do what I've done, I do not think I should explain why and who does it, as it is a desicion staff, and it had to be done. For you, i'm a bad person, for others i'm a good person, but always honest all the time, nobody ever dared to tell me otherwise, and I'm overclocker (sometimes good, Sometimes bad) since 2007 in HWBOT November of this year is my first submission. I think that since I registered in HW only have blocked me only two subs. (Jmke) in the first year, my fault of course When MFT software was not allowed in PcMark, There was discussion as well, and I had already a sub with this, I delete myself without any fuss As many know I am not a boy, not even a teenager, I am old, the oldest of HW and maybe the old bencher in the world, or i'm wrong ? By the way, Pro has confirmed that the tweak text edit is illegal , some days ago

Thanks I.M.O.G I think like Pro in this point to allow the ramcache if we allow AMD raid eXpert But AMD raid eXpert is not the greatest of the problems, Text edit, audio compress and others tweaks illegal (called by me and many guys "Cheats" ), are the real problem. Btw. In the past I use Intel Matrix Storage manager

I read this page now, but takes a time, again my english is is very slow. Edit: Yes i read this at this moment, and today i dont Blocked subs with this driver upload results today by Moose, Because there is no staff desicion to block this,I only write in the staff that if we allow raid eXpert AMD, we must also allow ramcache or ramdisk in Intel chips In this point why not use ramcache in Intel Chips ?

Are you sure about this comments ?, You have exceeded your writing I only do what is agreed in the staff, Why you know this or write this stuff ? Why you accuse me of taking alone the decisions ? Of course all this stuff are have been discussed in the staff , Massman approved to be blocked all submissions of the last 72 Hrs. with any tweaks illegal if you dont want the word "cheats Sweet say : Well, virus scan is too hight, 2460.21 MB/s You use something like ramcaching ? Moose say : amd raid eXpert Sweet say: Not by now, because to allow this software must be allow ramdisk or ramcache with intel chips Moose say; but this is allowed Sweet say: in PcMark05 ? Thats is correct without manipulation , and in spanish that i write not offensive but a strong way to answer what you imply in his words, like in your native leguage

I only agree to this, and really do not care what You have hinted about me, or Directly by mentioning That Sometimes I wrote everything and manipulating my words,. But for every insinuation about me and my skills (which are thankfully few) justice will be done with a lot (too much) overclockers who have used this benchmark using the hardware and not cheat of software. There are only 7 or 8 guys who have used these cheats and many more overclockers who complain about this indiscriminate use. And Yes, i blocked the subs. upload in the last 72 Hrs. all by TEXT EDIT . bat (script)this script amending temporary files of benchmark Only I to do this, Text Edit is a tweak not allowed, this is a Cheat undoubtedly. Lo que pienso en Español, mi lenguaje nativo : Si escribieramos en español, te aseguro que no podrias manipular mis comentarios como un chico, vos lloras como una chica lo que no podés sostener como un tipo grande. In my language, abbreviations are different than yours, sorry but if not defined or write the entire word many like me, do not know what you're talking about. Yes English is not my native language, but I can understand the concepts if written correctly, i'm not the only one that write or read cusi cusa the english