Sweet

Done

Then, again, I will not be fighting in the PCMark with you

Good point. I'm sorry for that, to maintain this benchmark, and that is what I have tried (like knopflerbruce, GENiEBEN, Pro, Gautman, Masman SF3D...well all staff), keep PcMark05. Again good point. Perhaps by ingenuity of tweaking's guys, or overruns tweaks (cheats - supertweaks or or whatever) has wounded at this benchmark, also assume that the staff is responsible of this, let things happen and the guys play, too much, but we got out of hand. And now we must work harder to get its house in order, or PcMark cease to exist as a benchmark. My apoligies, I'm just trying to fix what is broken, and there are (direct) guilty of this. I assure you that many of us are working a many time to fix this problem. Note: For several days I am almost 24/7 in this forum, for fix PcMark

But if you and IMOG sold their arecas and i-rams ? I think you have reason would we have to add

Please Sh@G, add to your submission, this information. Otherwise your submision should be blocked for "violation of rules HWBOT". Thanks so much

Please show me this sub. and why ? We will review them if necessary we see with Pro. No submissions in Pcmark until wrapper are ready, is a very hard desicion, but if we prove something dirty, we will, of course GEN this weekend is working very hard with the wrapper Maybe We may prohibit any submission with ramcache, like rst - amd raid eXpert or any software that do this, can be from now on or in the entirety of the base, regardless of the date I think Steve are right , only allowed, rst an amd r expert with 512 sector side "Only"

Moose, do not put the keys in public, when it detects by Futuremark, put on the black list, and no longer can use, please send to Denis the key by pm

there are something wrong in Hwbot, i cant edit this too. will try later. http://www.3dmark.com/pcm05/3175135

Guys I'm fully agree with this ( use only sector side 512 in rst and raid expert ), but what about software like supercache or ramdik ?, thats software are like rst and raidexpert with cache, and do the same. Yes i know, thas are software no drivers, but are not detectable

First Post updated

Thats is the problem, Amd raid eXpert is more like ramcaching that Rst, or i'm worng ? FYI. I never used amd raid expert.

No decision yet. RaideXpert and rst

Tonight, this will be included in the first post

Great score Denys, alright in this sub. congratz !! with time will be audited all the submission

Yes, zupernico, you can use cpu-z 1.57.1 for 3D submissions

I'm here without spot Beyond what any guy thinks, Pro has judged that the submission of Gluvocio not in line with PCMark05., Imho ( my opinion) if you look Hdd gen and virus scan is high in this sub., and noone ask the important question , what sotrage has been used ? But in this crucial time for the PCM. legality matters more than anything else. Good idea Karl. for all submission, in this benchmark ? all guys , or those in which we have doubts ? @Moose Please Moose, add picture of your rig in this submission,especially the storage used, thanks so much Opsss. and send me one Ssd

For Us nacho_arroyo is like Messi Give me one , only one 680 Gtx , please !!! Excelente Nacho , te veo antes de fin de año por Bs.As. ?

@Moose, why Virus Scan is so high, in Intel ? with 10 Ssd thats is correct ?(2094.77 MB/s) You have 10 Ssd ? , I never use many ssd., only 3 plextor http://hwbot.org/submission/2323631_moose83_pcmark_2005_core_i7_extreme_975_53547_marksP So, my friend please, explain this score, thanks so much

un saludo para ambos, Ximi y Nicolás, cualquier problema me consultan

And under ivestigation by all staff. We can not let anything happen again, sorry Denys

Ahhh, I thought you were asking something I did not understand, sorry I was looking at that and there's something ....maybe another new tweak

I dont understand this Steve, What do you want to ask ?

Yes Steve these values ​​seem very accurate within the microprocessors that I used.

Gracias, danke, thanks, grazie, Io parlo tutte le lingue ma, mi parla solo spagnolo Es un buen principio, y creo que un punto de partida para una mejor relación entre ustedes, los dos son muy buenos overclockers y a su vez , les gusta este juego., además son compatriotas. Cuando tengan discrepancias o dudas sobre una bench solo reportenlo a los moderadores, nosotros damos el veredicto final y listo, en principio todos nos podemos equivocar en un benchmark, a mi me pasa actualmente quizás por ansiedad (no quiero rsetear otra vez la pc., como dice zupernico). Tanto el Sr. Ximi como el Sr. zupernico son buenos overclockers, así que les pido que el tema quede zanjado (cerrado) acá o les cierro las cuentas personales en el B.B.V.A , yo trabajo allí Un abrazo a ambos y por favor tema terminado, tanto en este foro como en el resto de los foros que comparten. Sw Nota: Christian Ney sabe español :nana:

Guys take it easy, please. Spanish: tomenlo con calma muchachos , no es necesario esto si lo piensan seriamente, es solamente un juego un lindo juego , donde generalmente hacemos amigos, no enemigos. Ximi, por favor, a cada submisión tuya agregale las fotos de cada equipo , porque tu estas en la categoría entusiasta y éstas son obligatorias. zupernico. no es necesario que hagas público el problema, se puede hablar por MSN o facebook. y al menos llegar aun pacto de no agresión entre ustedes. Sé que el overclocking es competitivo, pero no para llegar al nivel de agredirse. Un abrazo a ambos Nota: Ximi si vos no me pasas los links , yo no sé cuales son las submisiones bloqueadas;)