-
Posts
1952 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Sweet
-
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Depending if it has been used for those subs. Like C. Ney (in the staff) said it is very difficult, sometimes, to differentiate a flash desktop submission with another no flash desktop. That is why we appeal to the honesty of each bencher, to delete the submissions made with this software. Later, when de mods. do their jobs could be collateral damage, perhaps, some sub can may be blocked wrongly, I feel sorry for this but I think it will happen -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
You know that -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
You explain this better like me, my english is cheat Yes it is Like CN commented on the staff , "we turn back in time", I hope that this Benchmark be clean again cheats, and re-used by all overclockers. :ws: -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
i only boost IE 60-100% , Imho. I think bob'tweak is Ok. only change the theme of windows., areo to classic, and classic to aero theme, nothing more, its a tweak or trick not cheat. IE tweak or settings its ok. not change nothing only leaves nothing in IE settings In this tweaks nothing are file modifie or files replaced -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Yes, thats right Thanks SamOCX. i'm in my job, and I think I should get to work, many have asked me, what are you doing? -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
I know C. Ney very long time, He is a good overclocker and person, He will block his score, is he has been used any cheats. Sorry i'm in my Job. come back later -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Pro (yougpro in XS) is the real judge who will audit each tweak is made and tell if cheat or tweak, he deleted their submissions. Please send to him any tweaks, in which doubt. CN is part of staff, is a moderator, and if have used any cheat, he will block -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
When the screen goes blanck in 3D, its a bug or something else, not a software, instead it would be a cheat in 3D if anyone use a software Like write before because you are using software to improve the score, and is not allowed. These rules were published in 2008 and known to all Guys, its easy, enforce rules that are from 2008 and do not ruin a benchmark #no human interaction or software or change codecs or files in Benchmark#, and this will always be so. Thats all -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
I know that all knows this, but is important remember -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
So...we will block this Here in Hwbot, we do overclocking right in a real storage system like Hdd, ssd, revodrives, and more, but this is real, like a processor or mainboard or a real windows install in the storage. Overclocking is real not virtual Then, Flash 2 Desktop is "not allowed" -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Moose you and the others guys who have used these cheats know what is right and what is wrong in each submission made . Flash 2 Desktop "by now" isnt allowed, in the staff no conclusions about this -
in this link we can continue talking about the cheats, the tweaks (honest) here http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?p=204965#post204965
-
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
Sweet posted a topic in Benchmark software
This post will be updated periodically 24/10/2012 time to put things in order (Thanks Pro) http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=205405&postcount=122 http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=205643&postcount=167 synthesis and to take into account This list will be updated periodically (thanks borandi) To all benchers : If you have used this type of tweaks - trick -cheats o supertweak, please delete this submission, and do not use it anymore Since October 24, 2012 - New (thanks SteveRo) Until the wrapper are ready 1. Futuremark link -ORB-required for all top 20 submissions global 2. For all non-top 20 submissions either Futuremark link or Pcm05 Results.txt required via screen shot. 3. Include real pictures of your rig, specifically storage and cooling. This is Mandatory for all submissions in PcMark'05 If you use ORB link, screenshot basic is equally mandatory Example .txt (thanks zafiropo) Example Screenshot with .txt (thanks to me ) -
Human interaction: like change codecs, files , etc. in the benchmark or in the So Any software: In computing a script, command file or batch file, commonly referred to barbarism script is a program usually simple. Sorry, but this is known to all benchers The cheats that are running in the PCMark are totally illegal, because it runs a command line "external" to change the end result, I say EXTERNAL (script or command line) Worse and more illegal is replaced, replace, change files, as is done in the audio compression subtest and WPR (in SO.). For all benchers : If you have used this type of cheats, please delete this submission, from this day (10/22/2012) do not use anything to replace, modify or replace any file, because I will request "ban for a significant period of time" On the subject of cheats, I have no friends or team mate, or "the best overclocker" or whatever.I will ask direct ban From now you can go down (delete) the submissiones that are not in rule When moderators start delete, there may be collateral damage or the lowering all without discrimination with Cheats or Tweaks. We have to give an end to this that hurts all benchers and HWBOT. Today 12 pm we begin to delete the submissions made with cheats in the last 72 Hrs. in this line, better delete for you, that for moderator, no ? My apologies, but PcMark should be a benchmark clean again, for ALL overclockers. Important Note: "The moderation staff no accept claims or complaints about using cheats!"
-
I insist, it's better now than later delete this cheats, challenge staff members , you and two or three more members, will get sansiones against. Sorry
-
To change or modify files own of the benchmark is cheat, as Text edit, audio compression, WPR, etc
-
Imo., Meanwhile notification arrives. members who have used the benchmark cheats like modify files either as replacement or modification of files (temporary or not), themselves could go erasing these submissions that are cheats. By the way, Those have many submissiones with cheats, at time of communication, I think proposing punishments, because as Mr.Scott written and others, there are benchers who are already aware that they are cheats and continue to use to this day. 21-10-2012 So...They are NO benchers, are Cheats. Sorry but I think that
-
You Moose better not change (or trade) anything with anyone
-
Yes, fully agree, but it takes time and money, something complicated Pro, also known yougpro, will be a moderator direct (or better judge) for PCMark'05, is one of the most knowledgeable people of this benchmark, off course the rest of the moderators we will help
-
Are you shure of this ? Moose83 please, explain What has happened to the tricks you consult with staff Can you explain this ? Thank you
-
Also Audio Compression like TE and the others , thats right ? For example , upload yesterday http://hwbot.org/submission/2321638_gluvocio_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8400_(3.0ghz)_76349_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/2321571_sebro_pcmark_2005_core_i7_2700k_106199_marks So this is a "cheat" too, if all these cheats are changing the root of the benchmark, ALL must be removed, thats all my friends
-
If a member of staff has used, handled or delivered information outside the staff moderation, is that it has exceeded its authority and failed in the ethics of competition. Perhaps like others benchers, have developed their own tweak and used in the in PCMark Because the benchmark have serious holes, i think so (so benchers are) Is our fault, By now, PcMark is under serious discussion in the staff, soon many submission will be blocked
-
I.nfraR.ed Imho sofos1990 wants to show the same thing that you said, to use this type of things is a cheat, or i'm wrong ?
-
Monitoring Zupernico user , cheat a lot ...
Sweet replied to a topic in Submission & member moderation
Ximi i think TerraRaptor is right in this. I can not say because I dont have a Z77and Ivy yet, but I think this run showing zupernico is right If you can show me with some proof that bad, would be better (Spanish) Ximi creo que lo que menciona TerraRaptor es correcto, no puedo asegurarlo porque todavía no tengo una z77 y un Ivy, pero me parece que esta corrida que muestra zupernico esta bien. Si puedes mostrarme con alguna prueba que esta mal, sería mejor -
Guys in this world, anywhere in the world, there are people who can easily develop a cheat to any benchmark, but that's not right in the overclocking, this is a cheat there is no king of software these days, any overclocker can develop a cheat to modify the final score, some overclockers have done this in my country., but dont use this because they think is illegal, like in Brasil and anothers countrys. I say Cheat i use that word too knut