Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Sweet

Crew
  • Posts

    1959
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by Sweet

  1. is interesting. but tweak (better Cheat) TE (text edit) is illegal, because modify temporary files, As I See It at this moment, all this is being discussed in the staff, we need a little time to come to a desicion. my apologies and all the staff by this
  2. Any software (tweak - trck - cheat or whetever) altering the benchmark achieve a result bulky is not permitted. There are many twaeks that altering the perception of the benchmark, because replace or modify temporary files of own benchmark. Any tweak doing this, is not allowed, and at that time no longer a tweak is a cheat, obviously becomes illegal, most probably the bencher use a cheat, runs the risk of being called a cheater and in turn that the staff can take action on. No limits, apparently, to the tweaks, then Sam OCX is right. Note:This place is Hardwarebot , not sofwarebot, overclocking the hardware is only one and the most important, here
  3. zupernico, you use integrated graphic of Z77 board. ? Maybe is mistake, please delete this submission @Ximi, please always provide pics of yopur rig in all submission in Enthusiast-League Thanks guys
  4. Ufff sorry i write slowly in english, better spanish for me.
  5. What ? not i am not !!!!, I am not flexible in this, this is a cheat, that is the problem w/PcMark., the limit of the hack
  6. I live in Buenos Aires - Argentina (15000 Kms), and a call from he can be more expensive than a 3770k. Look, perhaps next year I traveled to Germany - Netherlands - Austria and Italy, with my family (i hope), I prefer saving those euros for the trip Well...sorry for the Off Yes i know, many think like you and that is the problem Perhaps the communication of each member of staff, with benchers, should be more fluid. NOT by Telephone, please
  7. Thanks, We talked a lot with Christian about it, but a telephone is very expensive, only been made in the staff and in the facebook. Christian is part of the staff too, and think about it totally different. But i dont know his page, what is the link ? My feeling is : #think you can only make tweaks involving "only" the OS and that in no way change anything, as increasing a subtest score with script, in the original benchmark# Maybe i'm wrong, maybe i'm right
  8. For the record to ALL. Days ago GENiEBEN, staff member, has shown all the staff how it works- text edit tweak- Each member of staff is also a bencher, but always, the crew, prioritize research on every tweak in each of the benchmarks. Maybe some may not comment every tweak ( So...benchers are ), but finally, we have a good discussion of each of the changes that may or may not allow. By now tweak text edit is the discussion, well....sincerely I'm the one that discusses. I will not deny that the discussion is also, what is the limit of tweaks that can afford, because anytime one Sempron 2200+ show better score than 3770k, both w/accard or ssd or anything like HDD Thanks Gen !! :ws: I had to make this clarification
  9. Yes it is The most important tweaks I've used have been developed by overclockers of my country and are not equal to those who have used other overclockers from other countries. Some of them, such as changing the HDD, I chatted with Gluvocio (only), but he uses a different method. If you look, no one in Latin America, wants to use the PCMark, everyone thinks it's cheating, that is why we stopped using, and maybe have much reason. (this include the great overclockers of this region like rbuass - nacho_arroyo - siouxx, etc. ) @Scotty is good to be back, I took some time to reflect and do other things with my old car. (hobby of course ) cheers my friend Note: Anyone remember 3DMark'99 cpu tweak ?
  10. Nice Mr. arroyo, very bright, i like this board, Unfortunately restrictions in our country , prevent me from buying the rig similar. Ahhh "shutdown -a" :nana: Cheers nacho
  11. PcMark 2005 not the only one in question, maybe also PcVantage and PcM7, may have some problems "tweaks", if we look at the overall results. I personally have stopped running the PCMark 2005, too much time for tweaks, I'd rather lose this time adjusting the hardware. Besides with my spirit of overclocker (or almost) feel like I'm cheating the other guys, is my feeling in this problem I know this tweaks: - powertoy, transp windows, web page red, change Hdd (is script), virus scan. and a few more. I dont know Text edit "tweak" I have not tested. I think this is a script .bat, that exponentially increasing the score. By now, I prefer to wait until it is clear this problem of the PcMark (all the PcMark - Vantage y 7) It all started almost a year ago with the use of ram caching (undercover ) and now led to many more problems with more tweaks. Now moderate this benchmark is clearly impossible, if we do not define the limits of the benchmark's hack. if you ask me, I think you can only make tweaks involving "only" the OS and that in no way change anything, as increasing a subtest score with script, in the original benchmark (script or not script, that is the question) I think Pro can help a lot with this Note: anyone remember 3DMark'99 cpu tweak ?
  12. Guys, What is the limit? is what we are asking everyone using the PCMark (any benchmark like 2005 - Vantage or 7) Aristidis, Pro are right and rbuass, Scotty and Moose83 too, depending on each viewpoint. perhaps i'm not right, only i'm old Overclocking or Softwareclocking or both ? Interesting
  13. Clearly PcM 2005 is a complex issue. zeneffect, following your line of thought a) Absurd results, unusual regardless of the hardware that has been used, maybe tomorrow for example, Pentium III (Copermine) 750 Mhz get higher score than a i7 920 b) Is fair to those who have lost many hours to achieve good or better scores, without using tweaks or tricks like change something in the software ? Perhaps is time to let out,. would be a pity., maybe We should no longer use this benchmark at HWBOT. Mmmm i dont think so, but counting on me to help in this problem Ps: Meanwhile nobody wants to admit it, many use (and used) ramcaching in this PcM 2005, like another PcMarks
  14. I completely agree with this Since some time ago ALL ( include me) are ruining this benchmark, the results today can not give valid comparisons by the hardware used. I think so
  15. 3D Mark Vantage in PC Mark Vantage, please upload in the correct cat. thx
  16. Guys by now , the orb is required for the Global Top 20 (Vega's score is in the position at Top Global) You can see in this link: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/pcmark_2005/rankings?start=2&start=2#interval=20#start=0#cores= press any cores Thanks and regards
  17. Wooow...5 (five ) minutes for open a page, now in the other side of the world, (GMT-3)
  18. Guys I dont see anything yet that I says this run is "bugged", and i dont see significant differences compared with other scores. Someone can tell me why you think this submission is wrong ? because I dont see anything wrong here. Perhaps there is something I'm not seeing ? Imho..please maybe this run is bugged , i dont think so by now, but Mikecmd is not cheater. We should all try not to call any Guy "cheater" for not believing in your score, is the best for the community. Thanks Sw Ps: thanks k
  19. Yep, I feel the same many times What tweak for run 3D'01 ? Lod ?, run separately for each subtest ? What .bat use in 3D'06 benchmark ? Sorry many questions @Mikecmd, run this benchmark disable post processing ? or any tweak in the 3D'06 .bat (script ) or something else ? BR
×
×
  • Create New...