superpatodonaldo

sold, please close

make offer

bump

only 290/390/290X/390X

bump

For sale I7 7820x, delidded, only cpu 400 euros https://imgur.com/e1njdjh I accept bank transfer, buyer pays fees and shipping costs

bump

I'm looking for a R9 290X (or 390X, also 390 290) working, not mining

bump

Thanks Andrea

good job

well repeat, my intention was not to fire oc drama, just start thinking about 6/12vs4/8, 6/6vs4/4 and 4/4vs2/4 background story it's just a route accident I'm worried about several route accidents but well, I'll bench until I'll like to do

can I get an amen

It's not the first time that happen something wrong with competition, backgroung, rules etc....

Stage 1 FX 8-core am3+ Stage 2 X4 845 fm2+ or 8Ghz FX am3+ Stage 4 FX 8-core am3+ Stage 5 am3+ / fm2+ high clock cpu....

well, this thread not was made for oc drama just my thought for the future: CLEAR RULES BEFORE START a competition, maybe wait one more month before start the comps, or planning them with big advance

every result without official background are moderated

As I suppose there is no core number limitations, is it right? Stage-5 results are finally per-core? what about the others cpu stage?

this phase is not for heavy load

coffee overtakes

Amazing!

i7 7700k (see my subs) i3 7350k (see my subs) and waiting for a new IX apex from RMA

still doesn't work

bump

not sayd that, maybe my poor english doesn't help me to correct express my thought; ryzen example was just for show difference between div IV-V and div VI just want to say that (for example) 6 core and 4 core cpus should not be in the same division unless result be handled by "per core" (in multithreaded 2d benchs) As I remember in challenger divisions results never be handled by per core