Massman

Yikes! Strong card!

No, this is primarily for overclockers who are already attending CES. For those attending, there's the option the bench on the freestyle day. But you have to already be at CES.

For those who want to bench a bit at the HyperX OC Takeover http://hwbot.org/competition/hyperxhot15cesregistration/

Well someone's storming to the top! Very nice Daniel, very impressive benching spree!

2.88 GHz, nice

Competition background download link should be fixed (it's also available on the competition stage pages)

Well, we could add Prime95 24h to the database

So, long story short. The score was accidentally removed from the competition because a moderator misinterpreted the rules. I've informed ASRock about the mistake and they will be in touch for the weekly prize Lilchronic. Sorry about this!

Hm, I see what the issue is Lilchronic. Let me get in touch with ASRock about this.

It must have somehow then be removed from the competition?

Can you link to the submission, Lilchronic? We checked twice but couldn't find a submission.

Maybe the Daily Drivers would be more interesting if it were to be more of a stability test than running a single benchmark is. For example, running 10 of the HWBOT benchmarks back-to-back. Only if it passes all 10, and is thus stable, you can qualify for the Daily Drivers mark. Not sure ... something that can distinguish high-performance stable systems rather than pure benchmark systems.

So cool to see this benchmark kick off so nicely. Let's fast-track it for points :D

Hey Andrew, Yeah, message got forwarded. Will look at it this evening

Oh, now I see. You run a benchmark from 2001, so you take pictures with a camera from 2001.

The quality of this result is inversely correlated with the quality of the pictures

Looking good Mat!

Got a request to add 5G to the list ... since it's only a query away I've added it to the main post. Overall (5G) 365.031 - Dinos22 - Xeon E5 1680 V3 @ 5001.60 MHz - 1389 MHz 11-12-13-15 - GIGABYTE X99-SOC Force 376.381 - gubben - Core i7 5820K @ 5001.90 MHz - \N MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 378.894 - Menthol - Core i7 5960X @ 4953.00 MHz - 1601 MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 380.250 - nickolp1974 - Core i7 5960X @ 5000.00 MHz - 2666 MHz \N - \N \N 382.388 - Menthol - Core i7 5960X @ 4904.00 MHz - 1601 MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 384.245 - Punk Sods - Core i7 5930K @ 5000.00 MHz - 1500 MHz CL14 14 14 16 1T - ASRock X99 OC Formula 384.525 - Pulse88 - Core i7 5960X @ 5000.00 MHz - 2984 MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 384.525 - Pulse88 - Core i7 5960X @ 5000.00 MHz - 2984 MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 388.035 - delly - Core i7 5820K @ 5000.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - ASRock X99 OC Formula 388.737 - nickolp1974 - Core i7 5960X @ 4838.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 388.737 - nickolp1974 - Core i7 5960X @ 4838.00 MHz - 3164 MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 391.623 - Woomack - Core i7 5820K @ 4929.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - \N \N 392.330 - deOCer - Core i7 5820K @ 4943.30 MHz - 1352.1 MHz \N - ASRock X99 Extreme4 392.511 - deOCer - Core i7 5820K @ 4936.30 MHz - 1350.2 MHz \N - ASRock X99 Extreme4 393.265 - nickolp1974 - Core i7 5960X @ 4819.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - \N \N 394.712 - zyxxlol - Core i7 5930K @ 4874.90 MHz - \N MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 394.712 - zyxxlol - Core i7 5930K @ 4874.90 MHz - \N MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 397.689 - NATA 58 - Core i7 5930K @ 4983.00 MHz - 1400 MHz \N - Evga X99 Classified 401.193 - Master Mind - Core i7 5930K @ 4886.08 MHz - 1503.1 MHz \N - GIGABYTE X99-SOC Force 407.145 - andressergio - Core i7 5930K @ 4625.00 MHz - 2666 MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 407.956 - zachscustom - Core i7 5930K @ 4751.38 MHz - \N MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 410.124 - Sven - Core i7 5820K @ 4581.00 MHz - \N MHz 13-14-14-36 1T - ASUS X99-A 412.120 - andressergio - Core i7 5930K @ 4700.00 MHz - 2666 MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 414.399 - zachscustom - Core i7 5930K @ 4751.30 MHz - \N MHz \N - \N \N 415.756 - zachscustom - Core i7 5960X @ 4626.24 MHz - \N MHz \N - \N \N 415.881 - zachscustom - Core i7 5960X @ 4625.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - \N \N 416.786 - Bruno - Core i7 5960X @ 4680.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - ASUS X99-Deluxe 418.767 - Sven - Core i7 5820K @ 4570.00 MHz - \N MHz 14-15-15-36 2T - ASUS X99-A 419.922 - Punx223 - Core i7 5960X @ 4498.63 MHz - 3000 MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 420.227 - IntelGuy - Core i7 5930K @ 4680.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - MSI X99S SLI Plus 422.808 - zachscustom - Core i7 5930K @ 4699.40 MHz - \N MHz \N - \N \N 423.169 - primafrog - Core i7 5930K @ 4500.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - \N \N 423.340 - sskmercer - Core i7 5960X @ 4552.46 MHz - 2754 MHz \N - GIGABYTE X99-SOC Force 424.121 - NATA 58 - Core i7 5960X @ 4552.65 MHz - 1400 MHz \N - Evga X99 Classified 424.501 - lilchronic - Core i7 5820K @ 4697.22 MHz - \N MHz \N - ASRock X99M Killer 426.233 - zachscustom - Core i7 5930K @ 4691.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - \N \N 428.127 - kjjweber - Core i7 5960X @ 4004.00 MHz - 1602.6 MHz \N - ASUS X99-Deluxe 428.596 - kjjweber - Core i7 5960X @ 4377.00 MHz - 1466.4 MHz \N - ASUS X99-Deluxe 428.782 - frankythecat - Core i7 5960X @ 4600.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - Evga X99 Classified 438.122 - BossMac - Core i7 5930K @ 4854.04 MHz - \N MHz \N - GIGABYTE X99 Gaming G1 WiFi 440.187 - l0ud_sil3nc3 - Core i7 5960X @ 4003.36 MHz - 1601.4 MHz 12-13-15-15-1T - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 441.156 - l0ud_sil3nc3 - Core i7 5960X @ 4003.36 MHz - 1600 MHz \N - ASUS Rampage V Extreme 459.828 - sskmercer - Core i7 5960X @ 4398.70 MHz - \N MHz \N - GIGABYTE X99-SOC Force 487.637 - russell.payne - Core i7 5960X @ 4100.00 MHz - \N MHz \N - GIGABYTE X99 Gaming G1 WiFi 488.250 - SequenceFX - Core i7 5820K @ 4039.16 MHz - \N MHz \N - ASUS X99-Deluxe 562.376 - Bartleby - Core i7 5960X @ 4300.00 MHz - 2133 MHz \N - MSI X99S Gaming 7 600.897 - mshagg - Core i7 5930K @ 4500.00 MHz - 2666 MHz CL-15-15-15-35-1T - ASRock X99 Extreme4

Removed. There's a bug there ... pushing dev team to look at it

Great competition everyone! Please give us some time to go over the submissions to verify and we'll get in touch with ASRock;

Hi all, I'm looking for some ideas for a problem I've been trying to address for a while now. A lot of mainstream performance enthusiasts say that they're not interested in joining hwbot because none of the systems they see at the bot are actual PCs. Not just because of the liquid nitrogen, but also because they are in open test beds and not inside a case. The right analogy here would be to make the comparison between racing prototypes and street-legal production cars. It could be an interesting project to see if we can develop a competitive area for so-called "street legal" production desktop PCs. I've been thinking about this for a while, but I can't find a good starting point for this. Any ideas?

Thanks Stasio! - GIGABYTE X99 Gaming 5 --- F7i: download - GIGABYTE X99 UD3 --- F5g: download - GIGABYTE X99 UD5 WiFi --- F8g: download - GIGABYTE X99 UD7 WiFi --- F7f: download - ASRock X99 Extreme6 --- 1.55A: download - ASRock X99X Killer --- 1.52A: download

Nice one!

So close

The cost per hwboint ratio is excellent