Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Massman

Members
  • Posts

    20467
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Everything posted by Massman

  1. Dino only had 1720 [hwbot=2158285]submission[/hwbot]
  2. Of course it was. Current UAT builds should already have global points for CPU-Z again.
  3. If I'm not mistaken, TopPC and CTSun won the Taiwanese qualifier: http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread.php?t=260907 Can someone confirm? // confirmed
  4. If it behaves the same like a GTX 580, then I think it should do 1600-1650 in 3DMark03. I will try to find out soon! FYI, I've added the real coldslow BIOS for Hawk too.
  5. Remeber: deleting results will hurt your team too
  6. Not yet. But on the to-do list. As mentioned already, the current UAT build errored out and there are some issues with some rankings/points/cups/etc. Next build will be fine again. TPP = TeamPower Points UP = User Points
  7. We initially removed global points for CPU-Z (hardware points still remained) in Revision 4. Since quite a lot of people asked to revise this decision, there's a poll. Points based on brand (eg: AMD, Nvidia, ...) is not possible. Our algoritm does not support this. With the new Overclockers League implementation, AMD users cán however get high in the league without needed Intel hardware. Explanation: http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=112200&postcount=137
  8. Ehr, yes, of course.
  9. The algoritms are final, but in the latest build there was an error so the points are currently bugged on UAT.
  10. The pictures requirement only applies to the Enthusiast League. All scores receive points and all scores contribute to the team. Even if you did not attach pictures.
  11. Question I found at another forum: "Does not having pictures take away points from the team?" Answer: No. For the Enthusiast League, only the submissions (15 global + 20 hardware) with pictures will be contributing to your personal total. But, all result submissions still receive a rank and points. These points will still be contributing to the team!
  12. Only 6.40% to go before YES-votes hit 90% and global points stay!
  13. Points are not enabled yet, because I haven't added the competitions to UAT. Competition points will come when UAT is final.
  14. So I should call it 'Socket 1207' ? What other CPUs can fit on 1207?
  15. Updated. - 140 FPO/steppings - 493 different sample
  16. It's not really about the skill or effort required to obtain a certain result, but rather about the meaning of the value that you are comparing. If you compare a SuperPI or 3DMark result, then it's very clear that "lower = better" or "higher = better". The value of the end result cán be compared to any other system, and the comparison tells us something about the performance of that system. Comparing frequencies doesn't really tell you anything about the performance or even capabilities of a system. It is just 'a number' that you are comparing. And some architectures just happen to be running higher frequencies. Perhaps a better CPU-Z ranking would be %-overclock, because then at least the number is relative to the architecture.
  17. I always listen to the mass.
  18. FX-74 is in the database under Socket L1, not under Socket F. So, it can't be used.
  19. That's just rough. Nice work!!
  20. Because Afterburner only went to 1320/1365 MHz
  21. Excellent. People are so focussed on 'vendor influence' nowadays that they see it everywhere. Perfect example.
×
×
  • Create New...