aperacer

Personally I liked the idea of a living benchmark, it rewarded the active benchers. But I understand why others did not like it. For the future I would propose that we clearly label the "living" nature of y-Cruncher 5B, 10B and 25B In the rules and maybe also on the submission page it should be clearly stated that if a new version gets integrated in Benchmate, the performance per clock could increase significantly, thus making it necessary to rebench if you would like to keep your place in the ranking. What is the plan for y-Cruncher 1B? Will it keep Globals? y-Cruncher 5B is also a good compromise for the global rankings, still runable on old 1C, 3C and 5C CPU´s, as you can use 4x8GB DDR3 for max performance and with DDR4 and DDR5 platforms the necessary RAM Capacity is not an issue.

Could you please delete this score: https://hwbot.org/submission/5343630_aperacer_cpu_frequency_core_i3_7350k_5200_mhz/ Thank you!

Can you please delete this submission, wrong Benchmark: https://hwbot.org/submission/5343642_aperacer_hwbot_x265_benchmark___1080p_core_i3_7350k_5.07_fps Thank you!

Can you please delete this score: https://hwbot.org/submission/4950523_aperacer_superpi___32m_core_i5_3570_6min_57sec_86ms

With PCI ID you mean the Device ID that is visible in GPU-Z? When I inserted the 512MB Card in my Rig it was installing new drivers, so something has to be different

There are 2 different Versions of the NVS 310 One with 512MB of Memory: https://hwbot.org/submission/4566213_simi37_aquamark_nvs_310_129624_marks and one with 1GB of Memory: https://hwbot.org/submission/4168203_ewanstinybrain_aquamark_nvs_310_112389_marks The results are already mixed in the NVS 310 Category, but there are only max 5 results for each benchmark

So now the Specs of my last card: A3 Samsung 640 600-10356-0001-152 B 900-10356-0001-152 H

So, someone must be the first one: 8800GTS 640MB A3 Samsung 640 600-10356-0001-151 E 900-10356-0001-151 K A3 Samsung 640 600-10356-0001-151 F 900-10356-0001-152 G My other card will come, when I take the cooler off

Thank you!

You have to save the screenshot as an .jpg It will get much smaller

Maybe some DDR3 too, like 1156 or 1366?

Will the bot stay up, or will you shut it down again to recalculate the scores faster? Is it safe to upload new scores, or should we wait?

Could not the uat Server make the recalculations and once it is finished you could copy the Database? Or would that take way too long?

Is there a points cutoff at some point? https://uat.hwbot.org/benchmark/pifast/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1936&cores=4#start=0#interval=50 Rank 40 receives 47 points and Rank 41 only 0,1

How long will the recalculation take?

Maybe the new CPU´s should stay in their own ranking, like 8+8 or 6+4 and should not compete in the old rankings by disabling the E-Cores. Intel and AMD are going this way, because this is the future for them and for us.

In my opinion the solution @Negative_Feedback offered is the best one, but else solution #4 is also good for me

Sadly it does not work with my monitor, but hopefully others can use this trick

For R20 we need an example screenshot with an Full HD monitor. I try to squeeze everything in, without obscuring the important stuff, like in this example I hope this is OK

Thanks!

I am looking for a good kit of PSC RAM or similar (no Elpida Hyper´s) 2 or 4 Sticks

Edit: I found the Error: I was using an old .dll, wich was way slower Hello! Windows XP should be faster than Windows 7 in wPrime. So far I have tested 4 different Versions of XP: 2 are stripped down, XP Service Pack 2 and XP Service Pack 3 All of them perform significally worse than Windows 7. Setup is i7 860 @ 4.5GHz Win 7 --> 5,505sec for 32m Win XP --> 6,593sec for 32m I have tried with and without Drivers for GPU and Chipset, but only small differences Themes ON/OFF Can somebody help me?

Thank you!

There seems to be an error in the calculation for the points in this category. There is a jump in points between place 202 which receives 15,7 points and place 203 which receives 22,4points. The scoring of my result is also strange: nr. 325 --> 17,3 points nr. 326 --> 10,2 points (my result) nr. 327 --> 17 points I tried to recalculate the ranking, but nothing changed Could somebody look into this and fix it, or at least explain to me why this is? aperacer

HWBot Prime says that a Snapdragon 801 belongs to the 800-family, can I join, or is it an error?