mtech

Awesome clocks, congrats! Is this CPU have coldbug? Mine X5667 is stuck@-79C.

Thanks, guys ))

Ok, thank you Thor941.

Hi guys, Is it mandatory to add valid ORB link in case of all 1/2/3/4 GPU top 20 submittions (for example, top20 in dual GPU 3dmark 2005) or this link is required for only top20 world record HOF (any number of GPUs)?

Congratz Andre, excellent work!

Congratz, amazing CPU. And uncore is sweet too ))

MaJ0r, I'm not talking about illegal hardware sharing. But I think it`s no good to accuse other benchers including H@nter and me, when you post beautiful worlds "XtremeLabs for fair play" and do the same sharing: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/951655_maj0r_aquamark_radeon_hd_5870_379989_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/952457_sonix_aquamark_radeon_hd_4890_333589_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/926530_nick.ua_aquamark_geforce_gtx_285_354507_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/951300_tin_aquamark_geforce_gtx_275_352276_marks

MaJ0r, if this rig is your's, why I can't see you anywhere on photos? )) And then it should be no problem for you to show 2 CPUs that you have? TiNs CPU is here: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/996583_tin_cpu_z_core_i7_980x_5801.5_mhz

Congrats, very impressive FSB!

Nice "TiN`s rig score"

It's so easy to use TiN`s rig to post results under multiple accounts, yes http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1007451_tin_aquamark_geforce_gtx_480_416726_marks

No crisis for persons who are working for 12 hours per day to buy necessary hardware ))

FYI, our team have now in Kiev (only part of all hardware): mobos: 3 Rampage II Extreme, 1 Classified E762; cpus: 2 Gulftown ES CPUs, one i7 975; memory kits: 2 MNH-E kits (OCZ and Kingston), 1 BBSE (G.Skill Perfect Storm); VGAs: 2xPowercolor 5870, 1xSapphire 5870, 1xMSI Lightning 5870, 2xGTX295, 2xGTX280. Not a problem to post photos of everything with exception of CPUs ('cause they are ES) - if anybody will ask to do so.

2TiN: I'm not sure if any tweak is here: his wprime32 sempron run and his other wprime1024 results have efficiency the same as others. And only this result is much more efficient. I think it's just a bugged run. 2MaJ0r: Any chance to see your other wprime1024 sempron results with similar CPU clocks (5000, 5200 for example)? Or this is the one and only result ? ))

Nice score, my friend! Too bad that's this VGA is not so good as mine. LN2 is next step I think? 2guys from xtremelabs: I like your hysteric comments. Keep posting ))

Some photos: 1. 3xRadeon 5870: http://s003.radikal.ru/i202/1004/75/7e242b1f47b5.jpg 2. The whole system: http://s11.radikal.ru/i183/1004/d8/28027f007ff6.jpg

Some photos: 1. 3xRadeon 5870: http://s003.radikal.ru/i202/1004/75/7e242b1f47b5.jpg 2. The whole system: http://s11.radikal.ru/i183/1004/d8/28027f007ff6.jpg

Some photos: 1. 3xRadeon 5870: http://s003.radikal.ru/i202/1004/75/7e242b1f47b5.jpg 2. The whole system: http://s11.radikal.ru/i183/1004/d8/28027f007ff6.jpg

Nice ) That's with ~935/1174 GPU clocks?

Thanks. Unit was broken during transportation - R1150 went out from the 2nd stage. So unfortunately only R23(-80C) on the 2nd stage. Bypass closed: -78 unloaded/-75 idle/-73 load (wprime1024@5130 1.625V) Bypass opened: -68 unloaded/-68 idle/-66 load

Can you please explain why less popular 3dmark vantage gives more global points for the same place than 3dmark 2003: 1. 3DMark Vantage - Performance 2x GPU rank: 2nd out of 947 63 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=936799 2. 3Dmark 2003 2x GPU rank: 2nd out of thousands 55.6 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=938390 Also I found problems with PCMark scores. For example: PCMark 2005 4x CPU rank: 2nd out of 431, good for 30.4 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=913492 1. Actual number of results in PCMark 2005 4x CPU is 923 2. It gives much less global points than 3dmark vantage with similar popularity. Thanks in advance for checking this.

I think "XP Startup 220Mb/s" rule is not very good. This is a first subtest and it's quite easy to slow down it. Maybe limits for "HDD General Usage" and/or "Virus Scan" will be better.

Great result, congrats:woot: What RAID controller was used for this system? 638 in HDD General Usage is SO high for build-in RAID... Also interesting to see any details about HDD system.

Raptor 150Gb as system drive (not in RAID0) and 3xGigabyte I-RAMs for PCMark 2005. Please compare my result with others obtained with I-RAMs: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=813496 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=765995 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=784934

Why do you think 1024x768 is the default PCMark settings? It is not possible to set resolution in PCMark 2005 - it will be changed automatically for each subtest. For example, it will be changed in any case to 1024x768 for Transparent Windows. In other case - what do you think, all those results with resolutions <> 1024x768 should be blocked too? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=819478 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=892295 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=859879 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=813496 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833129 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=784934 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=765995 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=857324 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860974 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=868734