Noxinite
-
Posts
1543 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Noxinite
-
-
Moved this thread as sticky in the new sub-forum
Nice!
For GPU efficiency challenges do you guys think there should be a cap on CPU clock, NB clock, GPU core clock and GPU mem clock? This would mean the efficiency lies in drivers, drives settings, extra software and RAM.
-
Not a bad idea.
-
-
Sorry, just fixed it.
I'll make a news post about it on Monday or so to promote the contest
Is it possible to even find this competition without going through this thread? I can't find a link to it on either the main HWBot or OC-Esport pages
-
You could try fiddling with the VCCIN volts as some CPUs like lower/higher VCCIN and that then allows you to lower the CPU volts (I have a G3258 that hates anything above 2.04v for VCCIN).
Both of my Haswell CPUs (G3258 + 4670K) required ~1.35V to do 4.5GHz benchstable (XTU/cinebench), which is pretty average/on the low side. And for cache the G3258 required ~1.25 for 4.1GHz and did 4GHz @1.2v.
I doubt it's the iGPU if you aren't trying to OC it as well.
What motherboard are you using?
-
-
Thanks, I'm still waiting to do this again with NB, RAM and CPU cold.
-
Its seperated by cores for stage 1.
-
-
HW points slope looks much better. DDR2 mem frequency for under-rewarded?
-
Win10 not allowed mate
-
Not on the planning. What are your main concerns with how hardware points are distributed?
It would be better if the points slope was less steep.
-
Changing the slope of the points based on position makes sense more for HW pts than Global pts to me.
But otherwise the current points system seems to work - not perfectly, but it works. (If anything I would say there are too many global points for some benchmarks *shrugs*. But I prefer hardware points, so...)
-
I agree, but there are certain problems at the moment with "ambient" competitions that means that the rules need to be rethought. However, to circumvent this problem there could be more fixed CPU speed efficiency competitions.
-
-
Bring the cache speed up and tighten your tertiary timings for a nice boost in performance!
-
Push for the 1st place!
-
Dayum, that efficiency.
-
-
These are some damn nice scores!
-
Nice man! Here's our current thread on progress: http://www.overclock.net/t/1581259/novice-nimble-6-keep-on-pushing/0_30
-
Another good point. I love 2D, but I have dabbled in 3D and I hold the majority of scores in new(ish) benches on r9 270x. It would be nice to have more competition (and hw points) by grouping the rebrands in too.
-
Nothing against 2D points and 2D subs...
2D don't need nothing more... just competitive enough...
Problem related is that looks for 90% of submissions today is 2D...
The best in my way of view, is separate 2D and 3D... so we will have best 2D and best 3D subs every day....
Also will be nice to have something like we have for CPU (1core, 2cores,3cores, etc)... for VGAs (low end, mid range, high end)... I don't know and I don't have solution... just think will be more attractive for people that bench 3D, and you know, even for gaming related community, since they are focused in FPS, similar to 3D benches.
Hmm, actually separating it so we have both the top 2D and 3D scores on the front page and in the weekly updates doesn't sound half bad.
-
GPU Sub Forum
in General overclocking
Posted
But with AMD that would get complicated as so much was rebranded. I was thinking code name Pitciarn, ect.