Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Noxinite

Members
  • Posts

    1559
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Noxinite

  1. No idea. Hard to compare as it seems like you need different settings for air/cold.
  2. I kinda like how 1x, 3x and 5x are "legacy" global so to speak, but that's a bit off topic...
  3. There was a lawsuit that decided that there is no official definition for a core, so AMD could market it as 8 cores even if it shares resources in pairs. IMO just list it as AMD marketed it.
  4. It still feels like option #4 is the best put forward. Having mixed would be strange is you got 2P+8E & 6P+4E in the same global ranking.
  5. Noxinite

    [FS-US] PSC

    PMed about #1-4.
  6. I feel we should be thinking less about point distribution being "unfair" or "unbalanced", as that is still an ongoing process with HWBot since the change in ownership. Aiming for simplicity and fitting into the database in a way that makes sense seems more important right now IMO.
  7. I like the idea of having the small cores enabled/disabled for different rankings (no. 4). It could be implemented similar to the "unlocked shaders" tick box on submissions for graphics cards - but obviously you would have it enabled by default so the newer members wouldn't flood the database with incorrect submissions.
  8. Was only aiming for FSB this time, getting 1T or even 2:3 working is a lot of effort especially for 32M (don't forget all the tedious register editing either for effi). Maybe next time, but no guarantees.
  9. Tried again on LN2, but very little progress before CPU go poof - only 738. https://hwbot.org/submission/4797732 2nd chip tried stopped around 733 after a few hours of trying, so thinking maybe near board limit? Especially as without CPU-z open I only saw 740 maximum.
  10. 'Cause I'm just a sucka for cold PSC here's some more. One stick from the last 1600C7 set and the other from a new 1600C7 kit I got. Better for C6 freq, but worse on RCD so couldn't try 2750 6-9-6 like I wanted. So instead I was at much higher freq with RCD10 (that kills effi even with 3/4 IOLs), also check out that high RAS. Therefore still no bunnyextraction 16s. D;
  11. CPU-Z bug as Ground said, I saw x5 at one point. Side note, Giga doesn't let you even select x6.5 in BIOS, while Asus does (but sets x6 instead).
  12. Still not convinced that a PCI card brings a massive boost to ref freq, but 732 all dice: https://hwbot.org/submission/4794807_
  13. What is stock ram voltage though? Normal practice is to raise it a bit at a time to check scaling, as that way you can stop when either scaling turns negative or you have reached a maximum clock.
  14. All sold, please close.
  15. On Giga P45 the straps do perform quite a big different.
  16. Well the EP45T-Extreme definitely has this bug.
  17. Price drop, £30.
  18. Tried LN2 again, and once more almost zero scaling. Ended up testing C8 max 32M freq (set RCD, RP, RFC, RDWR all high) and got:
  19. Got LN2 and decided to run some cold mem. BBSE was a bit disappointing but the sticks only just do 2600C8 on air. Full pot & 2.1V: Ran my trusty 1600C7 again and finally got into the 17s. Full pot & 2.36V:
×
×
  • Create New...