-
Posts
1296 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
13
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Rauf
-
Splave - Core i9 7960X @ 5639MHz - 5067 cb Cinebench - R15
Rauf replied to flanker's topic in Result Discussions
It was a joke, following the last couple of days discussions in the forums. It's no cheat of course. -
Splave - Core i9 7960X @ 5639MHz - 5067 cb Cinebench - R15
Rauf replied to flanker's topic in Result Discussions
I see you figured out the time edit cheat for cinebench finally Great score! -
Has it been decided that it 100% is a cheat? I have no idea how to use a java console to pause any benchmark so I can't test it. But there is proof that using pause button does not "trick the benchmark to make it think it ran faster", so I would say that at least using pause button is not a cheat. Not any more than slow mode is for xtu. However I do find it unlikely that he has some other kind of super tweak to get that kind of efficiency with that OS and no overkill mode. But has he tried to explain it to mods or maybe even confessed?
-
Ok, so I found the screenshot for $@39@'s 7900X 1080p score. 1128 frames encoded in 12 seconds (elapsed time) equals around 94 FPS, yet his score is 120FPS. This was run on MSI Gaming Pro carbon, which does not have pause button. Seems the only explanation can be time manipulation = cheat. After he mentioned pause button and it actually affected elapsed time without altering the score I thought maybe he is innocent after all. But this definitely proves it. What made me wonder was that his score available on uat.hwbot.org with 6950X seems fine.
-
You don't know what you're talking about. The goc bios was not released until a few days ago. And was specifically designed to not work with the es cards. So that they could not be used for the comp. But I guess you know everything...
-
Would it make everyone feel better if I told you seaga should actually be in Elite league? It's just that nobody cared to "report" him as elite. He benched his way to nr1 using ES 1080ti with ES bios... All I really see here is the usual elite-envy. Trust me, it's not as glamorous as you think
-
One way to quickly verify if it's cheat or tweak would be to check the 7900X score in x265. As far as I recall it was done on MSI mb, no? No pause switch on MSI... If elapsed time is wrong, it must be cheat. The scores have been pulled so I can't check myself.
-
I tried on Kaby-X. Change time cheat works for this platform also. Score is increased, but "elapsed time" stays the same. Which means the score will have an unproportional long elapsed time... Using pause button does nothing for efficiency/unrealistic score, but inceases "elapsed time" by an amount which seems to correspond to how long you have paused benchmark. It can of course be used to run higher clocks, but where does the efficiency come from?
-
No, it's the same. Don't look at the 2xoverkill, as it can't be compared time wise with single run. Proper run, no overkill mode, for splave is 10 seconds. Cheated run is 14 seconds, but score is higher. Same principle as seen for the 6700K score.
-
Looking at this score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3396930_a39a_hwbot_x265_benchmark___1080p_core_i7_6700k_55.7_fps It works without a doubt on 1151. The benchmark duration is ~2 seconds off, and eff is through the roof for that mem speed. Doesn't heaven count total number of rendered frames for benchmark score? If so it should not be affected. Don't know about FM but they have been affected by rtc bugs in the past, so it would seem it's worth testing it at least. But it would surprise me if FM haven't thought about this...
-
Dude, you can't just accuse someone of cheating with no proof. This benchmark varies alot, especially on win7. Tune your OS, or better yet, use proper OS for this bench.
-
I have been wondering about this score for a long time: $@39@`s HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 1080p score: 55.7 fps with a Core i7 6700K Super "efficiency" with E-die mems at 1800MHz, beating Dancop with similar CPU speed and B-die at 2090+ 12-11...and that score was for Country Cup... Edit: and benchmark took two seconds longer to finish... Edit2: never mind fixing hwbotprime, aka the slot machine, good riddance
-
Two questions: 1: Is it max 1% discrepancy between screenshot and validation for mem freq stage? 2: Is the new OC lab mem needed for the qualifier? The rules says any galax retail mem, but this page says new OC Lab mem is needed: http://galaxstore.net/GALAX-HOF-EXTREME-OC-Lab-Limited-Edition-Memory-16GB_p_140.html "In order to compete for the GOC Online Qualifier you must purchase the Galax HOF OC Lab limited edition memory 16GB DDR and the GTX 1080Ti OC Lab Edition graphhics card." Thanks Galax for keeping the best XOC competition alive!
-
Rauf - Core i7 7700K @ 7100MHz - 4min 16sec 594ms SuperPi - 32M
Rauf replied to Noxinite's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks, I don't like to sandbag too much. -
Rauf - GeForce GTX 1080 Ti @ 2000/1500MHz - 223164 marks 3DMark2001 SE
Rauf replied to Rauf's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks everyone! I've always loved 01, best benchmark ever -
WR/GFP Email Notification testing
Rauf replied to Massman's topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
I was thinking more of a list where you could select individual benchmarks to get notifications from. Like for Vantage maybe I'd select 1xGPU GFP, 2xGPU GFP and WR. But not 3xGPU and 4xGPU GFP. -
TeamAU - GeForce GTX 1080 Ti @ 2100/1500MHz - 72001 marks 3DMark06
Rauf replied to zeropluszero's topic in Result Discussions
Really strong cpu-score. Don't know how you do that, normal cpu score tweak doesn't give that much -
Galax HOF 1080ti - 1.3v and overclocking tools
Rauf replied to Besty's topic in Nvidia GPU Overclocking
I don't think those tools are supposed to be shared, sorry. And if you're only on water I wouldn't bother anyway. I strongly doubt above 1.3 will help at those temperatures. If you decide to go for dice or ln2 shout out and I'm sure things will work out. -
Bios seems available to me. If it's the same as in the thread you linked it should be allowed.