Rauf

Two sets of Kingston Fury 16GBx2 6000C40. Doing well OC wise, with very tight subtimings as you can see from mem score. All air of course. Kit 1: 7000MHz C30-40-40-28. Failed 7070MHz, did not test anything in between. 550€ Kit 2: 6933MHz C30-40-40-28. Failed 7000MHz, did not test anything in between. 500€ Selling to EU primarily. Bank transfer, F&F or buyer pays paypal fees.

Strong!

Great score!

Good job!

Both these benchmarks scale very much with CPU freq, on newer GPUs at least. So that part won't make any difference as you currently need 12900K for both good GPU and CPU score...

Keep up the good 3D work! Time to take the GPU cold also!

All sold, thanks for space.

Last chance on last 5.3 chip. Will be sold on swedish market tomorrow!

Need the 2 good tray chips gone. 5.3 R20 for less than random new one... 600€ shipped within EU.

Really good efficiency! New drivers help much?

Work that USB :)

Nice chip! 1.96V actual voltage? :)

Retail sold. Price drop on the two tray chips. 650€ shipped eu Also has one slightly worse tray, 5.2ghz. 550€ shipped eu

3x 12900K that are quite a bit better than average retails. 2x tray chips (X batch) and one retail KF (V batch). All do R20 at 5.3GHz between 1.26 to 1.28V die sense. Price: 700€ shipped within EU paypal or bank transfer, buyer pays paypal fees

Yes, cs with "new" drivers. Anything newer than 37X or 38X has cs

Nice, never got 01 running on Asus boards the last two gens...

Cuda 11 FTW :) but let's see what my USB can bring...

Wow, very strong!

@snakeeyes @Leeghoofd Guys at hardwareluxx have been doing a really great job getting the most out of these cards. But there is also some discussion about something that is not quite right, see last post here: https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/threads/radeon-rx-6000-3dmark-time-spy-rangliste.1294520/page-52#post-28804684 I don't know what is going on really, would be great if anyone from HWL could clarify.

Great score!

Cool!

Thanks!

Fixed

I think I have mentioned it before, but I like the idea of just making the rankings % of top score. First place is 100%, and then every following score just gets the percentage of the top score. It's extremely simple to code and you never have to recalculate entire rankings, except when a new top score is posted. Should make for a much lower server load. You can also reduce your opponents points by uploading a better top score. For the unpopular rankings there could be dividers, like 75% if less than 100 subs, 50% if less than 50 etc. HW points could also be handled by dividers it you want globals to be worth more like it is today. Top score on HW points would be 100 divided by 2 for example. And then also add additional divider if less than X subs.

I think this is way better than the current system. The current where you go from 150 for first place to 75 for third is just absurd. What will the scaling be for hw points? Can't give high hw points for rankings without a decent amount of subs...