TheQuentincc

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ga_ep45_ud3/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/chipset/p45/ When clicking on the CPU frequency "hardware record" I can see the top sub using the motherboard/chipset, when clicking on CPU frequency to see the list of subs I get fewer result (maybe cause it's not the best of the user ?) Also suggestion for the search result, list it in this order : Chipset, CPU, GPU, Motherboard, users, everything else... There is not that many chipset that ever exist so it would be a bit easier to search for them, specially since it's now possible to list all the subs using a specific chipset. Regarding listing the subs using the same chipset, in Processors benchmark, indicate the Hardware as being x or x CPU, same for GPU and memory, it's a bit "missleading" to read this, user can think this chipset is running at 7+GHz when it's the CPU actually running at 7+GHz : https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_frequency/rankings?motherboardChipsetId=1728&hardwareType=mbChipset Also we can't select if we want to list subs made using a single, dual or quad core CPU in this case.

There is no info about the team creation date. We can't kick user from a team ? (uncertain if this was here before) It was still an issue before the new GUI but maybe it's time to address this as well. When trying to view the HW lib of an user, when clicking on the number of subs for a CPU, you can see the first 20 results but when you want to see the other subs by clicking on the next page, it just change the search query so you get either no subs/blank or subs from other users. More of an improvement, being a team captain, on the "reported" section I can see all the reports from all the users of my team as well as me, dating all the way back to when those users weren't in my team, it's a bit weird. Maybe we need some filters here ?

The "mobile" issue seems to be related to the width of the window. Will it be possible to force the "desktop"/large window mode in the future ?

The Cinebench - 2024 GPU - GPU family stage is unclear about multi-GPU support, I think we should limit to "1 videocard core(s) in total". The score seems to scale indefinitely the more GPU it use. If we keep it that way it would be more a stage of who can align the most GPU rather than an "overclocking" stage.

bump

I didn't managed to get a proper 32M runs with this CPU yet, I was stopped mid runs at like 3~4mins with no exact in round, probably too ambitious on the CPU. In this run the memory was running at -10C to -20C and 2.14V (to make sure it wasn't the limiting factor). At 5865 (510*11.5) my loop 9 was 3m00.594 and loop 10 was 3m20.359 so I could have ended at the fifth place if only it didn't crashed mid runs, I didn't had time to try lower clocks runs cause of condensation haha This 2000C8 kit (batch 10202003) was able to run 8M at 2000 6-6-5 triple channel on X58 with 2.1v aircooled, never tried much further. I'm hoping to build myself better stick in the near future 😛 edit : also fun fact, the board died the day before cause of it's fujipoly (cpu short), I had to fix it mid LAN by desoldering caps from my 770 and replacing all the fujipoly hahaha

Bump

I agree, this should be limited to 8/8.1 and up (if it's not bugged out), a bit like the "WINDOWS 8/8.1/10 RESTRICTIONS" from the general rules which prohibit using pre-skylake HW on 8/8.1/10 if it's not valided by custom validation tools/benchmate. For reminder : on pre-skylake HW the BCLK might affect how the RTC is generated and so the calculated taken time to finish the benchmark resulting in an invalid result, more info here : General Rules (hwbot.org)

bump

Nice one :)

bump

bump

bump

bump

bump