flanker

HondaCity: I dont think it....It will be maybe in windows8, Windows7 is "dead" for Microsoft, they focus for win8 last months.

it is not possible , what is stable. OK, at least CInebenchs run for this thread (for me is OK 24 / 7 about 0,5-1h PRIME blend test)

Massman: It is simillary as this idea: IMC of SB 1155 is 1333 MHz, no more (if u want believe me, download datasheet). FX has 1866 MHz default IMC. So than why people tetsing both platforms with 1600 MHz usually? Or....Some games and again FX, we know, FX scaled better with core 0/2/4/...Give priority to these cores and u will se "big" diferences. Its fair? Its cheat? No, it is the same as Windows7 and parking threads. Windows 7 is not perfect, but we are not Microsoft, so average user John dont will have tweaking windows7. Most people put CPU in to MB, installing OS and thats all. We are diferent people here in forums.... Or looks at some boards and Turbo ratio. SOme boards for SB-dt has classic Intel turbo at default setings-, but some boards performed more better, because here is modified turbo (some ASUS and Gigabyte boards). If is somethink default, I testing with this default, no changing it for "review". For interesting value I can show people some tweaks etc, of course, this is right. This thought is not about my AMD or Intel fans....

Ok guys, what about "stable" setings of FX chips and batchs (series)??? In format: CPU model, batch, VID without Turbo, cooling, max stable clock FX 8120 95W, 1139EPM, 1.128V, AIRcooling, 4840 MHz FX 8120 125W, 1140EPM, 1.24 , AIR cooling, 4700 MHz FX 8150 125W, 1140DPM, 1.313V, AIRcooling, 4950 MHz (5050 benchable Cinebenchs)

Hi Zdenek, of course, this is right, but we can not change OS settings in reviews, if is it fault of Windows7,...then that is it. Because we can than testing with affinity at cores etc etc. and all results will be little changed. It is really good for daily using and in reviews as interest ing fact.

heh, hope for 5.5GHz or more validation, if I got with Thuban with luck and a bit lower ambients temps (about +14C) 5 GHz, so...5.5+ GHz at FX?

perfect! I found BIOS right here ,-)!

great work! Like FX more now

ok, good choice !

U know,I am fighting for Cinebench. r11.5, it is really good optimized bench based on real aplication.Thinking, Im not alone,who want here this benchmark... Alternative is from my side y-cruncher.

nice pot !

Srry, but how I can open next CPU-Z in this little netbook? WTF? I know, submisions has 3 CPU-Z, but here it is not possible... :-/

omg! How I can next opening CPU-Z at this netbook?

like Brazos!

congratulation, now we will seen perfect BIOS every wek :-D

ah, srry, change admin pls to 2500k ranking (I made mistake with this)

Haha, thas cool! I downloaded BIOS for my Max IV Extreme a few minutes before your post and now I can download this new :-).

hot summer . In real working I have in hot summer days max about 36 C idle (today I have 19 C Coretemp-real think is it about 30 C, in room is 22.5C )

hehe, now Im testing x4 975 BE....Seems 4170 MHz is stable with 1.45V

7ate9's: nice! what cooling? Noctua NH-D14 More here in my minireview http://translate.google.cz/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=cs&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=cs&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.svethardware.cz%2Fforum%2Fshowthread.php%3Ft%3D58271%23content_start

hehe, no fridge , only a window . With normal ambients I cant break 4900 MHz

DInos: with what setings it was done? 1.55V and max validation? Or...Thx.

heh:)

i7 2600K L051A975, max multi 59x aircooled max 5350 MHz 1M with 1.55V, stable at 4950 MHz this is trange...59x multiplier and so bad chip

heh, u are better than my air 1090T BE :-D, 1 sec