flanker
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by flanker
-
Hehe, nice setups -
1E for 1l of LN2 and some rent for dewar (agreement made) :-)
-
hope, it will be ok
-
its easy, u can change it in msconfig (your windows still working as with old CPU, which u had before)
-
-
nice Christian...If I remember right, 3770K has 3.5/3.9 GHz?
-
-
-
-
hehe ,-) No and not will be too with Haswell in 2013...
-
-
very interesting with power consumption.
-
the banik: To boards reviews...Why not? 99.9% users dont overclocking. Only the buy some components and put it in. Yes, this is reality. If one board will have diferent turbo at default BIOS setings, why not? It is added value of product. This added value in diferent turbo can have a bit negative side in power consumption. Of course, but good reviewer in review must this all aspect explain. This is my assumption. Massman: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/core/2nd-gen-core-desktop-vol-1-datasheet.html part of 1.2.1 (of course, SB-E has not 1333, but 1600 MHz) http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/processors/amdfx/Pages/amdfx-key-architectural-features.aspx or details here: http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/49686.pdf easy ,-)
-
HondaCity: I dont think it....It will be maybe in windows8, Windows7 is "dead" for Microsoft, they focus for win8 last months.
-
it is not possible , what is stable. OK, at least CInebenchs run for this thread (for me is OK 24 / 7 about 0,5-1h PRIME blend test)
-
Massman: It is simillary as this idea: IMC of SB 1155 is 1333 MHz, no more (if u want believe me, download datasheet). FX has 1866 MHz default IMC. So than why people tetsing both platforms with 1600 MHz usually? Or....Some games and again FX, we know, FX scaled better with core 0/2/4/...Give priority to these cores and u will se "big" diferences. Its fair? Its cheat? No, it is the same as Windows7 and parking threads. Windows 7 is not perfect, but we are not Microsoft, so average user John dont will have tweaking windows7. Most people put CPU in to MB, installing OS and thats all. We are diferent people here in forums.... Or looks at some boards and Turbo ratio. SOme boards for SB-dt has classic Intel turbo at default setings-, but some boards performed more better, because here is modified turbo (some ASUS and Gigabyte boards). If is somethink default, I testing with this default, no changing it for "review". For interesting value I can show people some tweaks etc, of course, this is right. This thought is not about my AMD or Intel fans....
-
Ok guys, what about "stable" setings of FX chips and batchs (series)??? In format: CPU model, batch, VID without Turbo, cooling, max stable clock FX 8120 95W, 1139EPM, 1.128V, AIRcooling, 4840 MHz FX 8120 125W, 1140EPM, 1.24 , AIR cooling, 4700 MHz FX 8150 125W, 1140DPM, 1.313V, AIRcooling, 4950 MHz (5050 benchable Cinebenchs)
-
Hi Zdenek, of course, this is right, but we can not change OS settings in reviews, if is it fault of Windows7,...then that is it. Because we can than testing with affinity at cores etc etc. and all results will be little changed. It is really good for daily using and in reviews as interest ing fact.
-
heh, hope for 5.5GHz or more validation, if I got with Thuban with luck and a bit lower ambients temps (about +14C) 5 GHz, so...5.5+ GHz at FX?
-
perfect! I found BIOS right here ,-)!
-
-
ok, good choice !
-
U know,I am fighting for Cinebench. r11.5, it is really good optimized bench based on real aplication.Thinking, Im not alone,who want here this benchmark... Alternative is from my side y-cruncher.
-
-