Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

flanker

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2701

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

 Content Type 

Everything posted by flanker

  1. flanker
    wow, thats great chip
  2. flanker
    wow, how much volts for vccin and ring? next strong cpu...
  3. flanker
    awesome!
  4. flanker
    wow, nice.
  5. flanker
    nice
  6. flanker
    Thank you. I believe for 8 GHz run with XP. These were on Windows 7. I wanna try some harder modern benchmarks as wprime 1024, UCbench, hwbot prime and with 64-bit Cinebenchs. Hope around 6500-6700 MHz could be benchable
  7. flanker
    http://hwbot.org/submission/2467451_flanker_superpi___32m_a10_6800k_14min_57sec_765ms?recalculate=true 14m 57.765s
  8. flanker
    wow, you are kidding me? Awesome score man! Write more about it at ROG forum .
  9. flanker
    n1 man!
  10. flanker
    http://hwbot.org/submission/2465285_flanker_superpi___32m_a10_6800k_14min_58sec_547ms
  11. flanker
    nice, seems effective
  12. flanker
    oh god!Awesome run for liquid cooling
  13. flanker
    thanks guys
  14. flanker
    thx. I gonna try winXP if could be a bit higher.
  15. flanker
    nice man:)
  16. flanker
    wow, this is what about we talking Der8auer ....This chip can get under 9s 1M maybe
  17. flanker
    did you tried all modules? I think CU1/CU2, CU3...Soemtimes is the best CU2 or CU1, not C0
  18. flanker
    try again man, easy trick for CPU-Z...donw core with PSU check and open CPU-Z, after jump cores up with PScheck
  19. flanker
    Do you know, if some 290 cards are with Samsung or Hynix? But still nice result!
  20. flanker
    next http://hwbot.org/submission/2456565_flanker_superpi___32m_core_i5_4670k_6min_34sec_540ms?recalculate=true I dont know whats wrong...Im using chrome browser...
  21. flanker
    lol, seems, this is WR ...And what 1M? Try get 9.2s or less and you are my new hero :-)!
  22. flanker
    push it more, you are close AMD WR
  23. flanker
    next problems with today submissions: :-( http://hwbot.org/submission/2456542_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2456540_ thx for fix it guys
  24. flanker
    wow!
  25. flanker
    it will be question...Its TSMC 28nm, hard to say....I heard some spekulation about 28nm TSMC and FX: one of the reasons no more FX yet is technology process by TSMC. In theory 28nm TSMC is more power hungry than current 32nm SOI HK with the same size of die. So maybe some FX with new process (20nm?)???
×
×
  • Create New...