flanker

thx. I gonna try winXP if could be a bit higher.

nice man:)

wow, this is what about we talking Der8auer ....This chip can get under 9s 1M maybe

did you tried all modules? I think CU1/CU2, CU3...Soemtimes is the best CU2 or CU1, not C0

try again man, easy trick for CPU-Z...donw core with PSU check and open CPU-Z, after jump cores up with PScheck

Do you know, if some 290 cards are with Samsung or Hynix? But still nice result!

next http://hwbot.org/submission/2456565_flanker_superpi___32m_core_i5_4670k_6min_34sec_540ms?recalculate=true I dont know whats wrong...Im using chrome browser...

lol, seems, this is WR ...And what 1M? Try get 9.2s or less and you are my new hero :-)!

push it more, you are close AMD WR

next problems with today submissions: :-( http://hwbot.org/submission/2456542_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2456540_ thx for fix it guys

wow!

it will be question...Its TSMC 28nm, hard to say....I heard some spekulation about 28nm TSMC and FX: one of the reasons no more FX yet is technology process by TSMC. In theory 28nm TSMC is more power hungry than current 32nm SOI HK with the same size of die. So maybe some FX with new process (20nm?)???

will be working with Kaveri chips too or it must be new software for it?

Seems not much bad CPU...lol. Not always I have lucky hand for chip (or its bug? All Trinitys here seems very bad)

n1!!!

Gangsta team RAM

man, wow. You have this one in your colection? Nice Phenom!

this must be great retail!

wow!

yes, I was choose "no points", cause ES . But very soon Il have retail 9590 ,-)... PS: seems OK now, many THX

pls fix these results (I cant see it in hardware) for FX-9370 http://hwbot.org/submission/2439115_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2439114_ FX-9590 ES new 1M http://hwbot.org/submission/2439099_ Thank you

nice Cherv+Lam

I think the result is in wrong category. This is for 16 threads only. You have 32...

yes and strong in Superpi, near 5600 MHz 1M

And there is it, last one! Flagship of AMD, 9590! [video=youtube;OXJx-XOBtIM] 5 GHz benchmarks 3D Mark11 AIDA64 memory and cache benchmark AMD Overdrive bench Cinebench R10 Truecrypt Winrar bench x264FHD benchmark Overclocking benchmarks 5142 MHz 3D Mark Fire Strike 5142MHz 3D Mark11 5142 MHz ROG real benchmark 5242 MHz x264FHD 5242MHz AMD Overdrive benchmark 5242 MHz 3D Mark05 5242 MHz 3D Mark Fire Strike HT link vs Cinebench score 26xxMHz/28xx MHz/30xx MHz We want more! We want AMD enthusiast, ahuuuu! 5318 MHz Cinebench R15 5318MHz Fritzchess benchmark 5322 MHz 3D Mark06 5322 MHz MaxxPi 32M 5344 MHz Wprime 1.535V 5344 MHz Cinebench R15 1.544V 858 points 5344 MHz Cinebench R11.5 with 9.16 points holly FlanK3r! 5371 MHz 1.55V Cinebench R15 run. This is monster chip, I need better cooling! 5344MHz Cinebench R11.5 second run 9.25! The AMD "Spartans" never give up! My R11.5 "air" AMD record 5371 MHz 1.55V and 9.28 points! 5374 MHz HWbot PRIME benchmark The next maximus...OK, not in 32M Easy, easy with superpi 32M at 5418 MHz 5445 MHz Superpi 32M, but time is not much good (it was last benchmarks before borrow it back) 5500 MHz Superpi 1M 5554 MHz superpi 1M 1.555V What about 5580 MHz Superpi 1M 1.555V "air"? ? This CPU is madness 5747 MHz 5776 MHz CU2 All Core Units can idle at 5747 MHz, this is very good. The best is CU2 (core 2+3) 5833 MHz!! http://valid.canardpc.com/j2rf2f Hmmm, what missing? Test stability? Ok, there is it: Very nice 1.476V and 5033 MHz 1.535V for little jump up to 5092 MHz. More is impossible beause to hot for stability. But I found, every from all tested chips was hot else. Most of the chips has the best CU2 and all chips has worst CU4.