varachio

Well done phil! Nice one!

All FYI...HT gives worse result... I know is low... I will definitely figure it out soon...

Mate! welcome back to top scores!

Well done mate! Seems you figure out skylake triks

Thank you Loud_SiL3nc3

Re- benching old cards with better platforms in order to re-claim your previous rank position is always a challenge... I agree... And this beauty of mine has a bit strange voltage regulator with all protections in place... I think I will wait to try again @ stock with my kabylake cpu

Once again a great efficient score with just water cooling... Well done man! Well done!!!

Added!

Well done mate!!!

Well done mate!!!!

Well done mate!

Score made on my daily PC.. single run... for testing...

Thanks... It could be a lot better since this cpu in the past - under LN2 - reached 5,7 Ghz wprime32m stable... however, yes, this result is still efficient... Probably I will test the cpu again under LN2 in the near future...

Testing the automatic submission with my daily tuned system... apparently it seems that works

ok. then. Thanks!

I might found a solution to the issue that new cpu-z version is not sensing correct the half multipliers. Excuse me in case reported again earlier. If we go to the cpu-z folder and edit the cpu-z configuration file by set the below values to "0" , then the frequency displayed by cpu-z is the correct one. DMI=0 DISPLAY=0 BUSCLOCK=0 SPD=0 All the rest untouched. checked from cpu-z 1.69.2 version until 1.71.1 and works. Submission also works fine. Is that ok submitting results this way? I see that Remarc & LuDec already know this and submitted their results.

Coming soon to meet u! Congratz!

Why I get message: "invalid data file: unable to parse the datafile"? http://forum.hwbot.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=3152&stc=1&d=1438300580 OS: WinXP cpu: AthlonXP - barton core (downclocked to 500Mhz) gpu: FX 5200 (downclocked to 125/100) Am3 ver: 2.55.110 installed normally, run normally, saved score & data file normally. Anyone? Thanks in advance varachio

I can imagine that took a day or so to complete... correct?

turbo button exist here too... From 40 to 80 I am not pleased however with the efficiency of this score... Still cannot figure out what hold me back... Probably is the mobo and it's bios...

Probably you are pretty young you guys... My first PC was a 80286... Still have the cpu

Then you mean that: My 30pin Siemens HYM91000S-60 are FPMs & My 72pin VM432117405CJSA-6 are EDOs Correct?

Then I have to ask again for clarification since I cannot figure out from what I red before... We use FPM or EDO ram or both of them? FPM has 30pin EDO has 72pin See picture attached. We should clarify this...

Very efficient TASO... well done...

#2 for me, would be fine...