I.nfraR.ed Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 (edited) There you go again with your "awesome" scores. You must be kidding... Other people are getting 600-700MHz and you're getting 3GHz, don't you think there's something wrong? Even if you don't fake it on purpose, its a common sense ffs! Edited June 23, 2014 by I.nfraR.ed Quote
Lupino.86 Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 I can not believe it my eyes! I understand your concerns but CPUZ has validated my submit file (is impossible cheat), I can not say that he has misread the frequency! Quote
d3mox Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 I can not believe it my eyes!I understand your concerns but CPUZ has validated my submit file (is impossible cheat), I can not say that he has misread the frequency! hahahahhaha Quote
Lupino.86 Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 (edited) Really, CPU have booted and I have can made screenshot, AMAZING LOL edit: der8auer, no problem with my account? sure? if you tell me, I delete this incredible and funny result... I do not want trouble Edited June 23, 2014 by Lupino.86 Quote
Lupino.86 Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 Not in every situation Leaving aside this result, we say that we had a laugh (if I have no problems with the account as warnings or claim etc.), but can you tell me a single case of tampering CPUZ validation? Really exist? Quote
ludek Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 The limitations of CMOS technology not allowing to reach such frequency. Lupino, this is an CPUz error If you show us video with huge performance boost or CPU frequency measured by a oscilloscope, we can belive u. Stop telling us, you did 3 GHz @ pentium 2 @ air. Quote
Lupino.86 Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 (edited) The limitations of CMOS technology not allowing to reach such frequency. Lupino, this is an CPUz error If you show us video with huge performance boost or CPU frequency measured by a oscilloscope, we can belive u. Stop telling us, you did 3 GHz @ pentium 2 @ air. I do not want to be king of the world with this result, mi friend , I'm only talking to understand. Believe me, I never suspected that the CPU could go wrong especially if it is valid! What do I do? I delete the result? You tell me ... because I no have oscilloscope you like SuperPI? Edited June 23, 2014 by Lupino.86 Quote
TerraRaptor Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 Stop drinking vodka that much. Italians are not really compatible with it - wine is your drink. cpuz is easy to manipulate and that is not a secret. Quote
Lupino.86 Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 Stop drinking vodka that much. Italians are not really compatible with it - wine is your drink. cpuz is easy to manipulate and that is not a secret. Ahahaha, Italian drink wine, sure! I take CPUZ awareness of this issue, thanks for reporting (today I learned something, that's what it is for discussion ) Quote
GENiEBEN Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 And here I am struggling with my crap 775 boards to reach FSB600 when all I needed was a Slot1 board! Quote
ludek Posted June 23, 2014 Posted June 23, 2014 Do not feed the trolls Soyo SY-6BA+ has got Cypress W124 clock generator, it can do 133 MHz. It has also PCI/AGP/FSB ratio 1/2/3. If you have done 600 MHz on 440 BX (which is of course impossible), then your PCI/AGP/FSB should be 200/400/600, not possible. Second thing is that your mems should work 1:1 to chipset. 600 MHz @ SDRAM is even more impossible. ehh, funny trolling, I'm leaving a thread Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.