Guest harrynowl Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 I have a load of LGA775 bits coming up there are no novice heats though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 I was just wondering if I could use results I entered into another hwbot competition, or would I have to redo the benchmark? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 nvm my last comment, I exceeded my last comps result  My next goal is 5.4 GHz, but I have been running 1.55v (max for my cpu) since 5.1GHz... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest harrynowl Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 Don't worry about voltage, 1.7 is doable (with cooling) for a very short period of time. It's at 1.8v you might as well say hello to silicone heaven. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 My Asrock Fatality Killer wont let me go above 1.55v Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunkDogg Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 Does it have a extra selection for voltage offset as well as vcore? If so, this could be used to get that last few volts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 My first round in, overall im happy with the results especially since not only am I doing this in a NZXT H440, im doing it in it with all the panels on. The hwbot submission should really be 1648.5 per core because I was running my 8320 in a dual core configuration. Â I'll do a proper benchmarking run in a couple of days where ill actually strip the case of all panels and put the socket/backpanel/mofset coolers on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 Also thanks junk, I got it running at 5.4 GHZ with the offset for all of 3 minutes before it throttled itself to death Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunkDogg Posted September 9, 2014 Author Share Posted September 9, 2014 Sorry to hear mate. Got to monitor those temps. I always have HWmonitor running when pushing to a new unknown. Â Def need to get a mod to look at your HWbot sub as it should be right up under mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Sorry I didn't mean it broke, it throttled itself to the point where 2 cores will barely run notepad lol. It is working fine, and as soon as I do a real run with all my mobo fans, I should be able to hold 5.4 nicely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 My first round in, overall im happy with the results especially since not only am I doing this in a NZXT H440, im doing it in it with all the panels on. The hwbot submission should really be 1648.5 per core because I was running my 8320 in a dual core configuration. Â The calculation is always based on the default amount of active cores. It's a limitation in our back-end engine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunkDogg Posted September 9, 2014 Author Share Posted September 9, 2014 That's actually a real nice chip you have there Luke. 5300 @ 1.5V not bad at all. Wish my 8350 would do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunkDogg Posted September 9, 2014 Author Share Posted September 9, 2014 hahahahaha 0.01%. I see the game we will be playing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnonymousNix Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Nix reporting in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 Haha JunkDogg! Well, at least we can't say the race is not tight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunkDogg Posted September 10, 2014 Author Share Posted September 10, 2014 Might have to stop sandbagging and bring out some of the big ones everyone is hiding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 I guess i'll be the first to deploy my raw freq sandbag Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunkDogg Posted September 10, 2014 Author Share Posted September 10, 2014 Mate that is a awesome effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 Just got a question, CPU-z is reporting my RAM as 900 MHz even though it should be 1866. I checked bios and had changed the settings from auto to 1866 MHz and it still shows this even under load. Is it broken? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 nvm, after some research I found that it should be running at 930 MHz because RAM has two transfers per cycle so 930 MHz per cycle~ 1866 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunkDogg Posted September 11, 2014 Author Share Posted September 11, 2014 That's it mate. Google to the rescue haha. It's my go to for info. Â Got a 13983 run for maxxmem without OCing my chip last night. Going to play around with OCing and how it affects the bench tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Well I managed to get a pretty good read score on my RAM! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunkDogg Posted September 11, 2014 Author Share Posted September 11, 2014 I think something may have gone wrong there. Unless you wish toi replicate it as it's higher than half the LN2 scores. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l3gendluk3 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Fair enough, it seemed to good to be true, ill try again later I suppose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JunkDogg Posted September 11, 2014 Author Share Posted September 11, 2014 Yeah worst bit is I looked in the world records and it looks like you aren't the only one. The only difference is they left there's in there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.