Bwanasoft's insufficient proof in 3DM2001SE

[tiborrr]

F**k you bwana, why the hell did you delete my 6600GT 2k1? And what the hell is wrong with AXP 2800+ SPi1M? Digital photo of the screen is far more of a proof to me than printscreen screenshots. Check the f**king nature, car, dragothic, lobby high scores for the resolution comparison, jesus f**king christ!

 

Where in the whole wide rules there is a statement that the verification screenshot cannot be a still photography image? It's still screen-shot.

 

Hey, my Nikon D40x packaging says "Nikon - at the heart of image"

[knopflerbruce]

F**k you bwana, why the hell did you delete my 6600GT 2k1? And what the hell is wrong with AXP 2800+ SPi1M? Digital photo of the screen is far more of a proof to me than printscreen screenshots. Check the f**king nature, car, dragothic, lobby high scores for the resolution comparison, jesus f**king christ!

 

Where in the whole wide rules there is a statement that the verification screenshot cannot be a still photography image? It's still screen-shot.

 

Hey, my Nikon D40x packaging says "Nikon - at the heart of image"

 

There ya go... I don't like your language, but about verification photos, I'm with you. If your photo has all the needed information, then it's valid - eod! It finished superpi, it completed the benchmark. Whether it froze after the run is totally irrelevant:D

 

Yes, I'd like to see that statement about photos myself. I'll be pretty pissed if a CPU that's now dead would have one less WR because some used a non-existent rule to block the score:rolleyes:

 

But... a photo isn't more secure than a screenshot. All you need to do is save the screenshot, open it - and then make a photo of the screen:o

[THRASHER2]

But found nice Link

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and here for speciell Friends

I have a few of those :woot:

 

One of many batches of CPU's HAHAHAH!

[Bwanasoft]

F**k you bwana, why the hell did you delete my 6600GT 2k1?

 

loool

 

i think you can not read i have only blocked your Wprime with version 1.58

 

the other two you must learn to read

 

29 Mar 2008 01:48 created tiborrr manual online submission

31 Mar 2008 12:08 modified tiborrr manually modified by owner (tiborrr) - reason: no reason given

12 Apr 2008 01:59 insufficient verification (crew) NeoForce insufficient verification (no resolution of passed test is shown)

 

29 Mar 2008 01:48 created tiborrr manual online submission

31 Mar 2008 12:08 modified tiborrr manually modified by owner (tiborrr) - reason: no reason given

12 Apr 2008 01:59 insufficient verification (crew) NeoForce insufficient verification (no resolution of passed test is shown)

 

I give you last warning - don´t attack me personal - i make only my job

 

when you can read, watch the logfile ( little book under the bench right side )

 

if everyone say wrong submission the mods become mail or the bench is yellow marked - then whe watch and make Your job. Okay

 

 

I have a few of those :woot:

 

One of many batches of CPU's HAHAHAH!

 

 

nice to hear from you

[Bwanasoft]

Bwanasoft scores have been combed through several times now by different mods; the scores which are now online are valid.

QUOTE]

 

Sorry for the lot of work.

[gradus]

Bwanasoft how about this results:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677612

this result from valid.x86-secret.com(no voltage) with deleted ID! Why?

On a valid.x86-secret.com or ripping.org there is no such result. Plz give validation link.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635442

http://home.arcor.de/manika/750.PNG

mspaint ;-) White line below CPU-Z and cut right side.

 

PS I save yours screens.

[Bwanasoft]

Bwanasoft how about this result:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677612

 

this result from valid.x86-secret.com(no voltage) with deleted ID! Why?

On a valid.x86-secret.com or ripping.org there is no such result. Plz give validation link.

 

loool

 

CPU Z file killed at upload not verified - than no link no id - save pic thats the result - long time ago at ripping.org must stand my old one with 38xx - cooled with mach2 - this cooled with mach2 gt.

 

Same Problem like Knopflerbruce - CPU killed waiting about warranty

 

 

NOT PAINT ! Do you not Understand !!!

 

This CPU iss here - need Adapter than i bench it again ! with valit CPU Z LINK FILE wahtever you want.

[gradus]

loool

 

CPU Z file killed at upload not verified - than no link no id - save pic thats the result - long time ago at ripping.org must stand my old one with 38xx - cooled with mach2 - this cooled with mach2 gt.

 

 

you are LOL! no voltage window on screen!)))))))))))

[Bwanasoft]

you are LOL! no voltage window on screen!)))))))))))

 

 

yes when you upload the cpuz file comes no voltage - when is verified i become the link - iss the file damaged and not verfified you see only the Pic and the mark not verified - and at my account iss no link about damaged cpuz

 

i have watched but at account only verified links.

 

this iss verified http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=186341

 

but next higher cpu z file damaged

[gradus]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635442

http://home.arcor.de/manika/750.PNG

mspaint ;-) White line below CPU-Z and cut right side.

 

PS I save yours screens.

after this bwana delete result:

I'm sorry, the hwbot entry you've requested has been removed.

Fehler 404

Internetseite konnte nicht gefunden werden!

Die gewünschte Internetseite ist nicht erreichbar.

Überprüfen Sie bitte die Adresse oder versuchen Sie es später noch einmal.

But i save result:

and this:

[Bwanasoft]

after this bwana delete result:

 

 

But i save result:

and this:

 

 

You can save it or i can it mail no prob

 

but i hate the discussion about my benches than delete and make new

 

but i was never at ripping.org ? ? ?

[gradus]

Bwanasoft why you delete your result?

 

but i was never at ripping.org ? ? ?

lol

[gradus]

NOT PAINT ! Do you not Understand !!!

We understand all.

c, ban?

[Massman]

after this bwana delete result:

 

 

But i save result:

and this:

 

Dual monitor setup, no?

[gradus]

yes when you upload the cpuz file comes no voltage - when is verified i become the link - iss the file damaged and not verfified you see only the Pic and the mark not verified - and at my account iss no link about damaged cpuz

 

i have watched but at account only verified links.

if file damaged you will not receive the link and cpu-z screen like yours. If you have link, you have cpu-z screen with ID.

 

this iss verified http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=186341'>http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=186341

 

but next higher cpu z file damaged

next higher cpu-z file damaged?!?! 100mhz? 7 month?

 

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=186341

Submitted by Bwanasofz [Crazy-Oc] | Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:45:28 +0200 | Validated by CPU-Z 1.39

&

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677612

18 Dec 2007 12:14 created Bwanasoft manual online submission

cpu-z 1.42

 

 

 

 

Dual monitor setup, no?

no.

[Bwanasoft]

Yes you can have the warranty bill from AMD ! 3rd CPU - and one is here for change at RMA.

 

All screens with the football are on Multimonitor.

[knopflerbruce]

This thread is a mess atm... What are the results so far? Bugged CPUZ-versions and proof that Bwana used dual monitors once?

 

And I really don't see the problem with that Opty 185 result. Sure, everyone wants a validation link - but as long as a screenshot is enough, then it's a valid score. Prove that the image is a fake if it's weird. The only thing weird about the result is the 512GB ram he ahs installed on his PC:o (hehe)

 

This sounds like BS to me. Looks like someone if after Bwana here;)

[gradus]

yes, this is dual monitor setup. yes you can have tasks on other monitor.

last warning.

what? what warning? where 1st? i think massman ask me about my system.

Open eyes and look at screen! White line below CPU-Z and cut right side of cpu-z!

but as long as a screenshot is enough, then it's a valid score.

this screen from valid link! with no ID.

[Antinomy]

jmke, Jigit painted screens, the result - ban.

Bwana painted at least Palomino, the result - deleting them and saying "I won't do like that". Maybe doing in another way, but not getting caught? ;-)

http://img72.imageshack.us/my.php?image=750pt6.png =-O

you say that a cut edge is a multimonitor bug? Isn't that too much bugs on one man? :-D

And you say that the strange white line right under the window is because Bwana has modified a black wallpaper? There's nowhere to get the white there from, except MSpaint, or what he prefers.

 

I just don't get the clue - if the screens are fake (or what for do they have to be deleted?), then their author is a cheater. If there is a cheater, then he should be banned. Just like Jigit.

 

We are having a competition between benching teams in our country, and Neoforce at the results said a great phrase, when one result wasn't accepted:

"You thought you can cheat, and after it didn't work out, you can instead use a correct, but lower result?"

That's what I wanted to say. One can, others get ban. And no normal explanations this far.

yes, this is dual monitor setup. yes you can have tasks on other monitor.

Then why is the paint task on this screen? Or you want to say, that you can select, which tasks should be on the other monitor? :-)

[S_A_V]

Sure, everyone wants a validation link - but as long as a screenshot is enough, then it's a valid score.

 

As long as a screenshot is enough most users will keep posting screen crap instead of proper validation Why only global top20 results must be validated? I know, Futuremark products (except 3DMark2001) needs to buy advanced/pro license, but everyone can do validations for free at least for unlimited amount of CPUZ/wPrime/3DMark2001 results! Painted screen or not - we will never know for sure. Result owner will always say "no, my screens is not painted", even if it really painted. Just add new rule - accept new CPUZ/wPrime/3DMark2001SE results only with vaditation link - and this problem with screens will be partially solved. Validation links cannot be painted.

[gradus]

about

dual monitor setup. yes you can have tasks on other monitor.

The main idea of the multimonitor configuration is about leaving the stuff like Start, icons and task bar on one monitor and getting a free space for working on the second one.

So, the explanation is rather odd, because we clearly see Paint in the taskbar, but no CPU-Z. Or you want to say you can split the taskbar on two monitors as you wish?

I don't think so. Want to see how this can be done, if can.

And you say that the strange white line right under the window is because Bwana has modified a black wallpaper? There's nowhere to get the white there from, except MSpaint, or what he prefers.

Because Bwana have mobo with voltmod and modbios. Did I guess?

[Antinomy]

I agree with S_A_V completely, we have discussed this issue and that is the best way.

[Bwanasoft]

With Dual Monitor you can switch tasbar where you want and what.

 

Yes Voltmod & Modbios.

 

After the Palomino Mistake i use only CPUZ valit links. I have learnt about this.

[Bwanasoft]

Okay back to Topic

 

you see i learn about this

 

and this benches before i mod, when everybody have any Questions i learn about this.

 

Benches as Mod are i think perfect

 

CPU Z Valit Link http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=345379

3D Benches with Details http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723749

 

what comes next ?

 

I can to what i want, for some one is all to bad.

[gradus]

either window blinds which he is using, causing this error

White line below CPU-Z and cut right side of cpu-z?!?!

no comments.

 

 

 

 

Some People Are Alive Because It`s Illegal To Ban Them