Massman Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 95% of the deleted results were deleted because of the glitches mentioned before (Vistamize/dual monitor setup) and that leaves us with 10-20 results which are strange, most of the results are with the same processor, so about 3-4, maybe 5 different processor glitches. 20 issues on 1200 results is ~ 1,67%, which is not significant enough to instantly ban someone. Anyway, we're talking this through again, taking every opinion/fact into account and will have a solution as soon as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RomanLV Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 20 issues on 1200 results is ~ 1,67%, which is not significant enough to instantly ban someone. Anyway, we're talking this through again, taking every opinion/fact into account and will have a solution as soon as possible. These results are results in which "drawening" at drawing has made a mistake. I can draw much more than 1200 results and I shall be mistaken it is much less. And you me not ban me? Let's transform HWBOT into competition who less time will be mistaken at drawing?!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 I talking about deleted results + part still on site(not http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=18499&postcount=87). I don't sure that they with photoshop or something like that, but they with bugs. Example Geode NX-1250+(look at stepping and revision): http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=63741&thumb=false ps 7 results with bug only from 1 cpu the Geode run´s without any Mistakes at ASROCK Board with VIA CHIP ! when you take it on a NF2 Board say T-Bred CPU. And CPU Z tells lot of Mistakes. Hey i build Computers when somebody play trumpet under the Christmasthree, i know how Computer works and Programms and be shure when i want fake a screen i can fake it ! And nobody see it. Think i bench CPU BOARDS and RAM over the Limit ! At the benches for S462 i need 3 Boards - 25 CPU ( all Blow up ) and at this morning i blow up a brandnew Power NT at S462 ! I don´t need any FAKES. I´m old enough i´m not a child. i use my time for work or make other funny Hobbies. But back to Topic it´s this to high for someone ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 C'mon, that's not even a serious remark. HWBot is not about painting and cheating at all and you know that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 C'mon, that's not even a serious remark. HWBot is not about painting and cheating at all and you know that. But it´s a real bench. Upload today with details ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RomanLV Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 About Aquamark. How it is possible in aquamark to place CPU-Z in a screenshot? Paint? What for? I can open with the same success screenshot aquamark ` s on other computer! Aquamark has no validation absolutely! But speech not about no windows on screenshots and proofs of drawing of screenshots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 No You Open paint copy the screnn from am3, then you open the other programms press Strg+Print, open paint again ( second one ) and copy in, then you have a new picture with all in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RomanLV Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 You Open paint copy the screnn from am3, then you open the other programms press Strg+Print, open paint again ( second one ) and copy in, then you have a new picture with all in. I understand it, but I can save the first Paint and the second then to make on other computer. IMHO akvamark hardware it is possible to look most correctly only in other categories (3D marks) PS but ok, it's offtopik here. Topic not about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 But it´s a real bench. Upload today with details ! Was talking to RomanLV, not you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 looool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 You are so Stupid ! the Geode run´s without any Mistakes at ASROCK Board with VIA CHIP ! when you take it on a NF2 Board say T-Bred CPU. And CPU Z tells lot of Mistakes. Hey i build Computers when somebody play trumpet under the Christmasthree, i know how Computer works and Programms and be shure when i want fake a screen i can fake it ! And nobody see it. Think i bench CPU BOARDS and RAM over the Limit ! At the benches for S462 i need 3 Boards - 25 CPU ( all Blow up ) and at this morning i blow up a brandnew Power NT at S462 ! I don´t need any FAKES. I´m old enough i´m not a child. Go home to your mom and CRY - Okay - i use my time for work or make other funny Hobbies. But back to Topic it´s this to high for someone ? You know nothing about computers, you are a photoshoper. Give me answer for this results: http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=18499&postcount=87 MOD: Please keep it civil here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Massman keep it civil? =-0 You are so Stupid !Go home to your mom and CRY WTF?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 read his post again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 OMFG!!!!!!!!! LOOK AT SCREEN!!!!!You are blind? No voltage window! Lol, let's keep it civil... yeah right:D:o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 jmke agree, but in in 2004 and 2005 with old cpu-z. others bugs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Antinomy Posted April 16, 2008 Crew Share Posted April 16, 2008 but spamming this thread with useless "+1" is not the theme either. I agree absolutely.If you are going to nitpick the results of somebody else, be prepared to get the favor returned.Quite fair. That's why I offered checking out mine.he REBENCHED with this CPU and systems to provide better/correct validationYou mean less suspicious? but people are linking to scores which no longer exists, showing screens which have already been deleted, blocked OR explained. http://hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=716 The date is out. Why not just delete Jigit's results, which were very suspicious? Both gave me a tough race. Both suspicious. One a mod, the other banned. Where is the edge? Cause I don't want to ask for whom is it then other people join the forum to post "+1" in a thread where they never before visited.This thread was created 9th of April. A couple of days ago I never visited this thread, so?won't block an Aquamark (or other score) if it has no outlandish result for the hardware used, because the screen is lacking validationMine was though it wasn't outstanding, just №1 in the category. One man didn't know about certain hardware, I didn't have time to make an ORB version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 here SAME CPU ATHLON XP-M 2200 + first run original out from bios 12.5 x 133 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=346372 second run 12.5 x 166 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=346376 loooool i have hacked cpuid.com to valitate my CPU. Crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 Due to the controversy around some of Bwanasofts submissions, he has been honorably been discharched from his hwbot duties. He is not banned and free to continue using hwbot, only his mod rights have been revoked. He will be moderated as any other member. In order to avoid these issues in the future, we will invoke a new rule as of today. user is responsible for quality of his screenshot The submitter is responsible for the clarity and quality of his screenshot. If oddities occur due to the use of: a) UI altering software (eg windows blinds, custom skins, etc) b) UI altering drivers / hardware configuration (eg. some multi monitor setups) c) confusing / unclear wallpapers a moderator may block the result, even though the score itself may very well be correct. It is the submitters responsebility to provide a clear screenshot in order to justify the result. Submissions against this rule will be blocked as of today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts