May 1, 200817 yr The performance product is the product of some (2D) bench result and CPU speed for that specific run. Quite a few people use it to find out how well tweaked the system is etc. Would be an interesting addition to the scores. I can't imagine it would be too much work to add it either, it's just a product of two variables:)
May 1, 200817 yr Performance product = Time x MHz ; gives an approx. view on how well-tweaked a certain run is. Read this, PP maths in there: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=168567
May 27, 200817 yr I also think this is a cool idea! Sometimes PP makes it easier to compare similar setups
May 29, 200817 yr Author Should these additions cover all required feats for pp? Application: add min / max pp for each (applicable) bench app Validation: use min / max pp for manual submissions Result page: show pp indicate whether pp is good or not Hardware pages: show pp per processor / videocard core Search results: include pp (between) Moderation pages: show pp in overview show results with pp beyond min max of application A minimum and a maximum PP is OK, as long as you're not too strict (it shouldn't block scores that are just below the best PP, or block a score made with alot of apps running, and slow memfreq + bad timings.). Just remember that PP is different for every CPU model;) Show PP: yes! The mod stuff is yes as well IMO.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.