mollov Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Yes. If only Intel would be able to use their "insane processing" technology to build a useful website where I can find that information ... It now reads, that this result ain't XristoC best result with the HD2000.. but that's his only result with the HD2000.... and the result still doesn't show up in the stage 3... Yep. Already changed it in the database. I'm now waiting for the engine to stop being stubborn and change the overall result. :yes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Should be fine now. Any reason no one went for the new Fusion APU? The onboard IGP, the HD 6310, is pretty similar to the HD 4330. That mobility chip can already do 10k easily (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/977131_) ... with overclocking that should've been a nice score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matose Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 I think availability was the problem here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollov Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Exactly... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XpuctoC. Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Thanks! Massman - everyone does mistakes I wish everyone exceptional results in the next stages of the competition (and hope that at least some of these of the Bulgarian team would be a bit more exceptional than anyone else's). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoqolatl Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 You can't get Brazos boards anywhere except maybe Taiwan, and AMD is holding press samples until a new driver comes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScunnyUK Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Congrats winners! Tell me please, how work 37 multiplayer with 4 cores? I can only 35 with 4 cores Anything over 34x multi is done by the Turbo on Auto settings, at least it is on the P8H67 Pro. The maximum multi I can set manually is 34x but on auto it sometimes goes as high as 39x, so if ppl are manually setting 37 or 35 then it must be motherboard pacific? !! Congrats to the winners Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 OMG, that is so unfair now - if we don't believe screenshots, what then?! There is no rule about using bugs, as far as I see, and the Russians in Stage 2 did the exact same thing. After all it's also too late for adding that rule. Plus, knowing bugs is also knowledge of a kind. The guys from Romania just can't take it, but why should everybody conform with them?! They act as if they couldn't be loosing to us! Would you be so kind and elaborate the above statements a bit? What exactly "can't we take"? Do we look like we are loosing or anything? Please be so kind and shed some light on this issues for me, because I am really curious how a person I have never talked to before, I do not know and I haven't even seen around HWBot can have a problem with "the guys from Romania"... Regarding 2k3, clarifications were needed regarding that high GT1. It is higher then average, then it should be investigated. After analysing this a bit, clarification should sound like this: "Due to the larger cache size and also higher clock speed, i2600 manages to ouperform lower models". Is that so hard, is anybody offended when clarifications are required? The score is legit, everything is fine, people should just understand why. It is a common situation when new hardware gets around the testbench. So what exactly is the problem here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollov Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Well... clarifications are one thing, but saying "that score is high, we couldn't make that high with similar or better confing... explain that" is something else... then again, the misunderstaing with massman taking out the score made by XristoC in the next few minutes after your post, made a lot of people believe, that those two were related... you can't blame anyone for taking all that combination of circumstances in such way, when they're on the "wrong end of the stick"... If you can check the messages you'll see, that we made those clarifications you needed, and with massman fixing the problem with the HD2000 score, everything is clear and in order... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 (edited) saying "that score is high, we couldn't make that high with similar or better confing... explain that" is something else Why is that something else? That is how bugs, tweaks or different components behaviour get explained. In this case it was a better component. the misunderstaing with massman taking out the score made by XristoC in the next few minutes after your post, made a lot of people believe, that those two were related... After what post? I haven't posted in this thread... you can't blame anyone for taking all that combination of circumstances in such way, when they're on the "wrong end of the stick"... Actually I can... I feel a lot of frustration towards us in hanski's post and I really do not understand where that is coming from. Did I say anything to you guys? Did I say anything about any of your results? If you can check the messages you'll see, that we made those clarifications you needed No, actually you made no other clarification then the Turbo multiplier. That does not explain the much higher GT1 by itself. 2MB extra of cache plus a higher clock explains that higher GT1. I don't remember seeing anyone saying this in this thread before my post above. But this is a logical explanation. And yes the result is fine, I don't remember stating otherwise. In a competition like this, the moderators have to be extra careful, and all results will get discussed at one point or another. Russia's results can be discussed, Romania's results can be discussed, Bulgaria's results can be discussed, etc. That does not have to lead to personal conflicts and attitudes like this. I know it is excitind, and some of my team members can also get excited and say silly things, but in the end it is a gentlemen's competition and we should all act like it. Trust me, I hate every little inch of Slamms's blonde face for the results he got in the first two stages, but I admire and respect his work, and the fighting stays at a "screenshot level", not at a personal level... Edited January 16, 2011 by Monstru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanski Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 (edited) Would you be so kind and elaborate the above statements a bit? What exactly "can't we take"? Do we look like we are loosing or anything? Please be so kind and shed some light on this issues for me, because I am really curious how a person I have never talked to before, I do not know and I haven't even seen around HWBot can have a problem with "the guys from Romania"... Regarding 2k3, clarifications were needed regarding that high GT1. It is higher then average, then it should be investigated. After analysing this a bit, clarification should sound like this: "Due to the larger cache size and also higher clock speed, i2600 manages to ouperform lower models". Is that so hard, is anybody offended when clarifications are required? The score is legit, everything is fine, people should just understand why. It is a common situation when new hardware gets around the testbench. So what exactly is the problem here? I didn't say I was having problems with "the guys from Romania" in principle and I doubt that it matters if you have ever talked to me, if you have ever seen me or when I joined HWBot, because I have the right to share my views. My previous post was written before Massman cleared the case up and we believed that our result was removed due to reports about "the too high score in GT1" your mate matose was talking about - there have been many discussions about bugs and so on. I believe you understand how the things were being connected to each other by that time and why there were such acute reactions. However, everything is explicit now and I take my words about the Romanian team back. Edited January 16, 2011 by hanski Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 So when we get to the bottom of this, it is all Massman's fault... Well yet again in this competition, all I have to say is....Pieter.....I hate you man....I truly hate you hanski and Mollov - don't worry guys, with time, you will also learn how to hate Massman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollov Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 So that makes you a hater.... :D Don't be (joke) To explain my words above - sorry, it wasn't you, it was matose... I thought (although didn't check it to be sure) it was your nickname... it was his post and then the drop out of XristoC's score and then everything else... Anyway... it's an overclocking competition... it's not something, that can make you (figurative speech) or me hate somebody... it can bring out some heat, but then again... it's a competition afterall... so no hate here.... .... actually.... when come to think of it.... i really hate your west-located roads... from Timishoara to Turnu Severin... man... are those bad or what.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 it is all Massman's fault This basically sums it up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 i really hate your west-located roads... from Timishoara to Turnu Severin... man... are those bad or what.... Aaaaaaaaa, don't go there.... Our roads are not bad, are horrible, but I was in Golden Sands this summer and I did the mistake of going through our seaside, to Vama Veche, and then your seaside....Those 50Km from the border to Golden Sands were like.....you know that TV Show I shouldn't be alive? :D:D Massman - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollov Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 I feel you there, man... I drove from west England to BG through France, Belgium, DE, Austria, Hungary..... and then I was prepared to enter the "road hell" in Romania, that everybody talked about.... but to my surprise, 'till Timishoara it was almost all new roads... clean, new.... and then those 120km from Timishoara to Turnu Severin... I was about to get out of the car and push it into the river... that road was almost as bad as few roads in BG... I guess all that TIR trucks and road works got the worst in me... and when I got to the ferry and thought, that everything bad is behind me, 500m into the bulgarian road, i hit a dead dog in the middle of the road, 2am after midnight... but... enough OFF topic.... I wish you all luck in the next stages... and let there the better men (or women) and hardware win... :thumbsup: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Well, everybody has had he's share of adventure that is for sure Wish you guys good luck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.