max1024 Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 Is it real CPU? Do you have a foto of it? Google does not talk about it :0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oj0 Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 While they're rarer than hen's teeth, they do exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 Indeed, and I can guaranty you he has one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 Wasn't this just a CPU that is misprogrammed and detected as FX-24? If so, it doesn't really deserve its own category as a simple BIOS modification on those platforms can give you any desired output (but won't change CPU specs, obviously). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max1024 Posted November 28, 2016 Author Share Posted November 28, 2016 Give me a photo I want to see what had written on the top of cpu. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 I can provide a photo, but it's just a blank IHS. This is an ES of some sort that is detected that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Wasn't this just a CPU that is misprogrammed and detected as FX-24?If so, it doesn't really deserve its own category as a simple BIOS modification on those platforms can give you any desired output (but won't change CPU specs, obviously). Impossible for me to know if it is misprogrammed or not. It clocks like shit, so might be something else than an FX57... Different specs => different category, if you ask me. Personally I don't think Q3FE shold be mixed with 980's, either - different stock speeds I guess that applies to Q3QP as well, to name another example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Picture attached... this one was taken by the guy who sold it to me almost 10 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oj0 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Give me a photo I want to see what had written on the top of cpu. If it's anything like the ES chips I've had, it won't say a word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Antinomy Posted October 16 Crew Share Posted October 16 On 11/28/2016 at 8:42 AM, TaPaKaH said: Wasn't this just a CPU that is misprogrammed and detected as FX-24? This. If you read Revision Guide for AMD Athlon 64 and AMD Opteron Processors, you'll figure out that the FX model number if calculated as follows (row number 3): If you read the note at the top, you'll know that if NN=0 then the BIOS should program "AMD ES" which it apparently didn't. Then ZZ= 24 + NN (=0) we get FX-24. This is simply an unrated ES AMD FX CPU and given by it's stock frequency is an FX-57 ES. I will delete the category in the future. Right now I've discovered a huge bunch of interesting and supposedly, unknown info about s754/940/939. Stay tuned. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.