The official Country Cup 2022 AMD thread.

[Solid State Alchemy]

Scoring looks a bit wonky. First is only SUB!

[Leeghoofd]

Fixed, average bug however is still present however

[raiden]

Are Opteron CPUs on S940 allowed for Stage 3? Otherwise ppl will be stuck with FX CPUs. 

[Gigaherz]

Doesnt really seem to update the scores

[Leeghoofd]

1 hour ago, Gigaherz said:

Doesnt really seem to update the scores

????

[SolidStateAlchemy]

Yeah, team scores are wrong, averages are wrong, still says everyone needs 3 more scores... it's just broken

 

Specifically the 7zip stage

Edited November 3, 2022 by SolidStateAlchemy

[SolidStateAlchemy]

Intel y-cruncher pi 1b seems to be correct, and averaging scores correctly, maybe copy the settings for that stage and apply them to the other stages?

[Leeghoofd]

link me, I see nothing wrong besides the scores which are linked on the average scoring...

take eg Geekbench4 multi in AMD: 

(10781+8988) / 4 = 4942.25; the average is spot on, even though it lists your fist sub, but counts your best one

 

CB R20

(11492+8844+16329) / 4 = 9166.25

[SolidStateAlchemy]

ok, if scores are divided by 4 then that part checks out.

 

I know Team USA has at least 3 subs for 7zip, but when you click on the teams score link it goes to the Georgamel's first ( and worst) sub and doesn't reflect top 4 scores.

[Leeghoofd]

Team USA submits with the same CPU CORE,  a 5900X is a Vermeer Core, a 5950X is also Vermeer Core based CPU, subbing twice with the same CPU also has no effect on the amount of submissions. Your turn....

[SolidStateAlchemy]

I think a lot of people understood that to mean core COUNT since 7zip is divided on its benchmark page by core count and not architecture.

 

In many people's minds Core =/= Architecture.

[Leeghoofd]

it mentions CPU Core, not processor Cores, there's the catch in this stage. 

[I.nfraR.ed]

That's a catch, indeed. I was clueless why my score doesn't show up.

[Leeghoofd]

added this:

 

[SolidStateAlchemy]

Just now, Leeghoofd said:

added this:

 

Thank you for the clarification.

[Leeghoofd]

If there's somehting else unclear, lemme know

 

anyway our coder is working on the average score listing. Plus we are trying to get rid of that blocking score thingy too, but the latter  might not be fixed this weekend, it will require some extra testing

 

[Goku is Gei]

Wondering why it dosen't appears on the average, it's currently the only ddr3 memory frequency sub in Canada https://hwbot.org/submission/5113624_

[Leeghoofd]

6 hours ago, Goku is Gei said:

Wondering why it dosen't appears on the average, it's currently the only ddr3 memory frequency sub in Canada https://hwbot.org/submission/5113624_

You already have a better ddr4 sub. Only one sub counts per user. 

[SolidStateAlchemy]

this score https://hwbot.org/submission/5114091_bavor_7_zip_ryzen_9_5950x_187508_mips

 

should have knocked this score https://hwbot.org/submission/5111018_doomed83_7_zip_ryzen_9_5950x_160950_mips

 

out of the 7zip team ranking. The total team score is correct, but keeping track of who has subbed what is pretty much impossible right now.

 

Is this the scenario you mean when you say the coder is working on the average score listing?

[Goku is Gei]

Wondering why his sub dosen't appear on average: https://hwbot.org/submission/5114714_ His ddr3 subs clearly faster than mine

[Hilderman]

Yup, needs some work, coding, or something. Presently, a better sub is not knocking out a previously submitted lower score. I'm sure they'll get it sorted.

[Goku is Gei]

I saw that ddr3 sub had finally appeared, thank you

[Leeghoofd]

8 hours ago, SolidStateAlchemy said:

Is this the scenario you mean when you say the coder is working on the average score listing?

yes

The average score listed at the stage page is correct.

The programmer is fixing the shown submissions that are part of this correct average score, as currently they are not properly listed if you click the average score in the stage ranking... 

Easiest thing for the teams to follow up is to make an excel and verify our average with yours... But keeping in mind if users submit multiple hardware scores that they can block other country members' scores...

[TASOS]

3 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

yes

The average score listed at the stage page is correct.

The programmer is fixing the shown submissions that are part of this correct average score, as currently they are not properly listed if you click the average score in the stage ranking... 

Easiest thing for the teams to follow up is to make an excel and verify our average with yours... But keeping in mind if users submit multiple hardware scores that they can block other country members' scores...

This result does not show in R20 stage , but it's calculated in average

https://hwbot.org/submission/5115004_tasos_cinebench___r20_ryzen_5_5600x_4745_cb

 

This result in Wprime stage does not show nor calculated either , it lists scores 1/5

https://hwbot.org/submission/5114998_tasos_wprime___1024m_ryzen_5_5600x_1min_21sec_727ms

 

 

[Leeghoofd]

euh the stage mentions  : Use 4,6,8,12,16 processor core(s) in total.

5600X and the 5600H are both  6 cores.... so only one score will count, you need to submit with the other processor cores too

 

For the average score it took your score into account:  81 seconds divided by 5 is 16 seconds something...

If it was the Ultraex2005 score of 130 seconds it would be 26 seconds average...