February 14, 200917 yr Hi! Sorry if this has been asked. I hadn't time to search... How is results ordered in ranking, when several users have exact same time in Super Pi 1M? It seems the higher CPU MHz has better place. But why? Shouldn't we consider "performance"? Thanks in advance!
February 14, 200917 yr The earlier the result is submitted, the higher in ranking IF same score, as far as I know.
February 14, 200917 yr Too bad I don't think so, tying the run is not the same as dethroning the run. sounds like a fair way to handle it to me.
February 15, 200917 yr Author Massman, You're right on that CaNNon, Yes true I just wanted to know how these rankings are done...
April 3, 200917 yr Author I use this thread to ask almost the same question. My team-mate did a SuperPi1M run with P4 D805: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838393 He is placed #15 with 29,906sec but the user in #14 has 29,907sec time. http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=740&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 Is that a bug due to numbers "rounding"?
April 3, 200917 yr I use this thread to ask almost the same question. My team-mate did a SuperPi1M run with P4 D805: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838393 He is placed #15 with 29,906sec but the user in #14 has 29,907sec time. http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=740&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 Is that a bug due to numbers "rounding"? Yeah, and if HWBot thinks the scores are the same, then the older one is on top.
April 4, 200917 yr Crew I use this thread to ask almost the same question. My team-mate did a SuperPi1M run with P4 D805: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838393 He is placed #15 with 29,906sec but the user in #14 has 29,907sec time. http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=740&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 Is that a bug due to numbers "rounding"? Is there any plans to go from 1/100 s to 1/1000 s at 1M? In times when getting under 10 s it would really make sense...
April 4, 200917 yr Author There's no question, this run is faster. So maybe can some moderator change the order? Tnx!
April 4, 200917 yr It is a OT for this thread, but there is another small "bug" to fix- according to hwbot, the fastest CPU is running at 8,1Hz . Why? -Small "m" means milli, big "M" is mega http://hwbot.org/hallOfFame.do?type=result&applicationId=13
April 8, 200917 yr Author I asked lolloom to delete his submission and submit it again. So we'll see in few minutes, how this time the order goes...
April 8, 200917 yr if it's implemented it can only be done for new scores FYI Not by editing older scores?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.