ceemic Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Hi! Sorry if this has been asked. I hadn't time to search... How is results ordered in ranking, when several users have exact same time in Super Pi 1M? It seems the higher CPU MHz has better place. But why? Shouldn't we consider "performance"? Thanks in advance! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 The earlier the result is submitted, the higher in ranking IF same score, as far as I know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceemic Posted February 14, 2009 Author Share Posted February 14, 2009 Too bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Too bad It's an incentive to go even faster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaNNon Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Too bad I don't think so, tying the run is not the same as dethroning the run. sounds like a fair way to handle it to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceemic Posted February 15, 2009 Author Share Posted February 15, 2009 Massman, You're right on that CaNNon, Yes true I just wanted to know how these rankings are done... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceemic Posted April 3, 2009 Author Share Posted April 3, 2009 I use this thread to ask almost the same question. My team-mate did a SuperPi1M run with P4 D805: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838393 He is placed #15 with 29,906sec but the user in #14 has 29,907sec time. http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=740&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 Is that a bug due to numbers "rounding"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted April 3, 2009 Share Posted April 3, 2009 I use this thread to ask almost the same question. My team-mate did a SuperPi1M run with P4 D805: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838393 He is placed #15 with 29,906sec but the user in #14 has 29,907sec time. http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=740&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 Is that a bug due to numbers "rounding"? Yeah, and if HWBot thinks the scores are the same, then the older one is on top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew stummerwinter Posted April 4, 2009 Crew Share Posted April 4, 2009 I use this thread to ask almost the same question. My team-mate did a SuperPi1M run with P4 D805: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838393 He is placed #15 with 29,906sec but the user in #14 has 29,907sec time. http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=740&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 Is that a bug due to numbers "rounding"? Is there any plans to go from 1/100 s to 1/1000 s at 1M? In times when getting under 10 s it would really make sense... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceemic Posted April 4, 2009 Author Share Posted April 4, 2009 There's no question, this run is faster. So maybe can some moderator change the order? Tnx! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 4, 2009 Share Posted April 4, 2009 Okay, definitly something to look into! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaan Posted April 4, 2009 Share Posted April 4, 2009 It is a OT for this thread, but there is another small "bug" to fix- according to hwbot, the fastest CPU is running at 8,1Hz . Why? -Small "m" means milli, big "M" is mega http://hwbot.org/hallOfFame.do?type=result&applicationId=13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceemic Posted April 4, 2009 Author Share Posted April 4, 2009 ...and Hz, not hz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew stummerwinter Posted April 5, 2009 Crew Share Posted April 5, 2009 Beencounters... But you are right... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceemic Posted April 8, 2009 Author Share Posted April 8, 2009 I asked lolloom to delete his submission and submit it again. So we'll see in few minutes, how this time the order goes... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 8, 2009 Share Posted April 8, 2009 if it's implemented it can only be done for new scores FYI Not by editing older scores? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.