87dtna - GeForce GTS 240 @ 799/1269MHz - 182151 marks 3DMark03

[geobot24]

Bugged run?

[DopeLex]

definitely

Edited May 20, 2011 by DopeLex

[87dtna]

Well, the first run the 182129....so I deleted 03' and reinstalled from different download site. Second run was here 32 points higher yet. Not sure what to tell ya, I listed all the details.

[Christian Ney]

run it @ stock you will see

 

Normal score should be around 11k not 182k

[87dtna]

Oh, and right before I ran 03' my 06' score was 18k and 05' score was 30k. I changed zero settings before running 03'.

[87dtna]

You mean video card at stock clocks? CPU?

 

And what are you talking about 11k? My 06' score was 18k. I was expecting more like 50k or so.

[Mehdi_FXX]

For Sure is Bogg! this score For this VGA is Impossible! Compare with this Result: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2170648_xsat_3dmark03_geforce_gts_240_10404_marks

[Mehdi_FXX]

Yes you valided for 05 test and you finish this bud it is Bogg! some times Scores are too much! 182k is for 580 @ 1600 and sb @ 5.8 Not 240!

[BenchZowner]

The card's underperforming, mine does 200k

[Mikecdm]

The card's underperforming, mine does 200k

 

If he would have run the cpu at decent speeds, might have broke 200k. Clearly the cpu was bottlenecking the card

[87dtna]

For Sure is Bogg! this score For this VGA is Impossible! Compare with this Result: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2170648_xsat_3dmark03_geforce_gts_240_10404_marks

 

 

That guy is submitting gt240 results not gts240. They are two completely different cards.

 

If someone can tell me what I did wrong I'd be more than happy to fix it, but thats the results I got and there's my screenshots and futuremark link so thats my score.

[El Gappo]

That guy is submitting gt240 results not gts240. They are two completely different cards.

 

If someone can tell me what I did wrong I'd be more than happy to fix it, but thats the results I got and there's my screenshots and futuremark link so thats my score.

 

Are you smoking crack? If you seriously think you can get 3rd single card on 03 with a card that can barely play css, on the stock cooler! Then you need to be certified.

[Mikecdm]

That guy is submitting gt240 results not gts240. They are two completely different cards.

 

If someone can tell me what I did wrong I'd be more than happy to fix it, but thats the results I got and there's my screenshots and futuremark link so thats my score.

 

You submitted the obviously bugged score. That in itself is bad enough, but failing to see this is even worse.

[Wumpus]

That guy is submitting gt240 results not gts240. They are two completely different cards.

 

If someone can tell me what I did wrong I'd be more than happy to fix it, but thats the results I got and there's my screenshots and futuremark link so thats my score.

 

you didnt do anything, and thats not the point. The software messed up and produced a bugged run, nothing you can do about it. That is an illegitimate result.

[knopflerbruce]

Bugged run, shit happens. Suggestion: look at other results to get an idea of what to expect, then you'll see if you get a bugged result.

[87dtna]

So how exactly did software mess up when after the first run I deleted that 03 install, downloaded 03 again from a different site, reinstalled, ran it again and got the same results?

[nolonger]

So how exactly did software mess up when after the first run I deleted that 03 install, downloaded 03 again from a different site, reinstalled, ran it again and got the same results?

 

Video card was so unstable it bugged the run. Seriously, you want a #3 worldwide single card on 03 to pass being made with a GT240?

[BenchZowner]

Don't be a knucklehead.

That score is the result of a bug, a glitch.

Be it software, be it hardware ( edge of stability clocks, dying card/cpu/ram, etc ).

 

Do you need to get a FutureMark ( yes, the developers of 3D Mark ) employee here to tell you that it is a bugged score to realize that all these people here were right ?

 

jeez