Crew Turrican Posted January 6, 2010 Crew Posted January 6, 2010 im bummed, my geforce 4 is direct 7 and 3dmark03 wont run full benchmarks. just the wings of fury. yep, the geforce 4 mx series only have dx7, so only the first test will run. Quote
placid Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 ^^^ and score only 3 digit The art of this stage is.. hard to find GF4 Ti, AGP mobo with oc capabilities or C2D processor support Quote
Crew Turrican Posted January 6, 2010 Crew Posted January 6, 2010 ^^^ and score only 3 digit The art of this stage is.. hard to find GF4 Ti, AGP mobo with oc capabilities or C2D processor support 3dmark03 is mostly gpu-depended on gf4 ti cards, so there's no "uber" cpu needed. Quote
buttons Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 the highest score ive got so far is 344. amd socket a xp 3200+ overclocked 2517mhz. MSI geforce 4000 mx. 330mhz gpu/287mhz memory Quote
Matti OC Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 very good, GeForce4 MX 4XXX Rank 2 GeForce4 MX 4XXX Ranking: 1. pxhx - 449 marks 2. egm_xt - 232 marks 3. AlinRazvan - 145 marks 4. Joni- - 103 marks: GeForce4 Ti Ranking: 1. D'n'B - 2679 marks 2. Matti OC - 2324 marks 3. OCMARTZ - 2320 marks 4. Lippokratis - 2282 marks 5. Despair - 2159 marks 6. Dan Jacques - 2127 marks 7. Gotcha - 2103 marks 8. Dirk@B - 2101 marks 9. Massman - 1962 marks 10. Johni5 - 1847 marks lg Matti Quote
Dan Jacques Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 I would suggest that the validations are required for competitions hwbot to prevent fraud. It is important to the results above suspicion in competitions. What do you think? Quote
buttons Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 I ll post a submission tomorrow. i was trying to get 350 out of the setup. I read I can do pin mods on my socket a athlon and overclock further -- so im going to try some of those. Quote
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Posted January 7, 2010 I would suggest that the validations are required for competitions hwbot to prevent fraud. It is important to the results above suspicion in competitions. What do you think? Whoever cheats/commits fraude in an HWBOT competition is banned for life. I hope that shows how serious we are about this Quote
anvil Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 very good, GeForce4 MX 4XXX Rank 2 GeForce4 MX 4XXX Ranking: 1. pxhx - 449 marks 2. egm_xt - 232 marks 3. AlinRazvan - 145 marks 4. Joni- - 103 marks: GeForce4 Ti Ranking: 1. D'n'B - 2679 marks 2. Matti OC - 2324 marks 3. OCMARTZ - 2320 marks 4. Lippokratis - 2282 marks 5. Despair - 2159 marks 6. Dan Jacques - 2127 marks 7. Gotcha - 2103 marks 8. Dirk@B - 2101 marks 9. Massman - 1962 marks 10. Johni5 - 1847 marks lg Matti Hi guys, Do those both rankings mean that the final ranking will be splitted in two? Low-end GeForce 4 on one hand and High-end GeForce 4 on the other hand? I have seen no reference to that in the presentation of the competition. Thanks Quote
anvil Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 Well for exemple during the MSI Extrem Speedster, the Corei5 were given points depending on all CPUs, but at the end of the event, the best Core i5 was given 10 points in each stage. In the Hwbot OC 2010 challenge, le MX 440 are ranked with the Ti. Let's say the stage is over. Pxhx who is the best in the MX 440 has 0 point. But will Hwbot create a new ranking (as for MSI Extrem Speedster), in order to rank the MX440 separately? I do not know what will be the stage 2 in February, and depending on the hardware that will imply stage 2, this new ranking will be useful or useless, I mean if GeForces 4 are included or not in stage 2. Except if you create for each stage of the Hwbot OC challenge both high-end and low-end rankings. Cheers, Quote
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Posted January 7, 2010 The idea of the oc challenge is to have one stage a month, not two or subrankings or anything like that. If we start doing this, we end up having to split up the competition in a number of rankings equal the the amount of hardware categories we have ... which makes it too chaotic an uninteresting. The reason why the chosen platform is so old is to allow interested people to go to ebay and find a card to participate ;-) Quote
anvil Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 Ok that's perfectly clear, so we can already say that MX440 will have no point Do you have any financial interest in ebay ??? Juste a joke Quote
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Posted January 7, 2010 Buying a GF3 also has no point . I mean ... it's a competition ... it's not "make-everyone-feel-like-a-winner"-day Quote
Matti OC Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 Un-official ranking ;-) Mattis´Ranking (Ich wollte nur etwas fair sein) Quote
anvil Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 Anyway, that's a really good competition ! You've done a really good job here. Quote
Matti OC Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 (edited) HI, Cooling: Air @ Zalman / default GPU / Ram Voltage Edited January 7, 2010 by Matti OC Quote
Matti OC Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 mh, GT1 ist ein C2D ca. 10-20 FPS schneller zB. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=850986 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860968 lg Matti PS:Treiber 44.03 @ Riva (Z...) bringt nichts im 2003, deswegen stehe ich auch vor dir :) http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?gpuModelId=877&applicationId=2&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&sli=false&limit=100 Quote
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Posted January 7, 2010 I think C2D is only faster because the transfer rate from AGP to CPU (NB bottleneck) is much higher. For instance, on my XP platform, I see no scaling from increasing the CPU frequency, but huge scaling when I increase the FSB frequency. Quote
Mr.Scott Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 I ll post a submission tomorrow. i was trying to get 350 out of the setup. I read I can do pin mods on my socket a athlon and overclock further -- so im going to try some of those. You can. Quote
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Posted January 7, 2010 Installed the voltage modifications ... let's see how high this card goes on air cooling :-) Quote
buttons Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 mr. scott. could you share how you raised the voltage on your socket a processor? Ive been searching the web, my a7n8x-vm doesnt have the option in the bios, i must resort to pin mod. At this point I dont know if its my cpu or motherboard holding me back. anything over 178mhz fsb or 2517mhz cpu speed. maybe more voltage or maybe its fsb... i read the 166fsb xp 3200+ chips didnt support higher fsb speeds? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.