Massman Posted January 6, 2010 Author Share Posted January 6, 2010 Interesting! What about AGP @ 50MHz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buttons Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 im bummed, my geforce 4 is direct 7 and 3dmark03 wont run full benchmarks. just the wings of fury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted January 6, 2010 Crew Share Posted January 6, 2010 im bummed, my geforce 4 is direct 7 and 3dmark03 wont run full benchmarks. just the wings of fury. yep, the geforce 4 mx series only have dx7, so only the first test will run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placid Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 ^^^ and score only 3 digit The art of this stage is.. hard to find GF4 Ti, AGP mobo with oc capabilities or C2D processor support Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted January 6, 2010 Crew Share Posted January 6, 2010 ^^^ and score only 3 digit The art of this stage is.. hard to find GF4 Ti, AGP mobo with oc capabilities or C2D processor support 3dmark03 is mostly gpu-depended on gf4 ti cards, so there's no "uber" cpu needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buttons Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 the highest score ive got so far is 344. amd socket a xp 3200+ overclocked 2517mhz. MSI geforce 4000 mx. 330mhz gpu/287mhz memory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matti OC Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 very good, GeForce4 MX 4XXX Rank 2 GeForce4 MX 4XXX Ranking: 1. pxhx - 449 marks 2. egm_xt - 232 marks 3. AlinRazvan - 145 marks 4. Joni- - 103 marks: GeForce4 Ti Ranking: 1. D'n'B - 2679 marks 2. Matti OC - 2324 marks 3. OCMARTZ - 2320 marks 4. Lippokratis - 2282 marks 5. Despair - 2159 marks 6. Dan Jacques - 2127 marks 7. Gotcha - 2103 marks 8. Dirk@B - 2101 marks 9. Massman - 1962 marks 10. Johni5 - 1847 marks lg Matti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Jacques Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I would suggest that the validations are required for competitions hwbot to prevent fraud. It is important to the results above suspicion in competitions. What do you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buttons Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I ll post a submission tomorrow. i was trying to get 350 out of the setup. I read I can do pin mods on my socket a athlon and overclock further -- so im going to try some of those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 I would suggest that the validations are required for competitions hwbot to prevent fraud. It is important to the results above suspicion in competitions. What do you think? Whoever cheats/commits fraude in an HWBOT competition is banned for life. I hope that shows how serious we are about this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anvil Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 very good, GeForce4 MX 4XXX Rank 2 GeForce4 MX 4XXX Ranking: 1. pxhx - 449 marks 2. egm_xt - 232 marks 3. AlinRazvan - 145 marks 4. Joni- - 103 marks: GeForce4 Ti Ranking: 1. D'n'B - 2679 marks 2. Matti OC - 2324 marks 3. OCMARTZ - 2320 marks 4. Lippokratis - 2282 marks 5. Despair - 2159 marks 6. Dan Jacques - 2127 marks 7. Gotcha - 2103 marks 8. Dirk@B - 2101 marks 9. Massman - 1962 marks 10. Johni5 - 1847 marks lg Matti Hi guys, Do those both rankings mean that the final ranking will be splitted in two? Low-end GeForce 4 on one hand and High-end GeForce 4 on the other hand? I have seen no reference to that in the presentation of the competition. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 Un-official ranking ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anvil Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Thanks Massman, but will it give points ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 How do you mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anvil Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Well for exemple during the MSI Extrem Speedster, the Corei5 were given points depending on all CPUs, but at the end of the event, the best Core i5 was given 10 points in each stage. In the Hwbot OC 2010 challenge, le MX 440 are ranked with the Ti. Let's say the stage is over. Pxhx who is the best in the MX 440 has 0 point. But will Hwbot create a new ranking (as for MSI Extrem Speedster), in order to rank the MX440 separately? I do not know what will be the stage 2 in February, and depending on the hardware that will imply stage 2, this new ranking will be useful or useless, I mean if GeForces 4 are included or not in stage 2. Except if you create for each stage of the Hwbot OC challenge both high-end and low-end rankings. Cheers, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 The idea of the oc challenge is to have one stage a month, not two or subrankings or anything like that. If we start doing this, we end up having to split up the competition in a number of rankings equal the the amount of hardware categories we have ... which makes it too chaotic an uninteresting. The reason why the chosen platform is so old is to allow interested people to go to ebay and find a card to participate ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anvil Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Ok that's perfectly clear, so we can already say that MX440 will have no point Do you have any financial interest in ebay ??? Juste a joke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 Buying a GF3 also has no point . I mean ... it's a competition ... it's not "make-everyone-feel-like-a-winner"-day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matti OC Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Un-official ranking ;-) Mattis´Ranking (Ich wollte nur etwas fair sein) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anvil Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Anyway, that's a really good competition ! You've done a really good job here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matti OC Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 (edited) HI, Cooling: Air @ Zalman / default GPU / Ram Voltage Edited January 7, 2010 by Matti OC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted January 7, 2010 Crew Share Posted January 7, 2010 not bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matti OC Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 mh, GT1 ist ein C2D ca. 10-20 FPS schneller zB. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=850986 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860968 lg Matti PS:Treiber 44.03 @ Riva (Z...) bringt nichts im 2003, deswegen stehe ich auch vor dir :) http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?gpuModelId=877&applicationId=2&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&sli=false&limit=100 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 I think C2D is only faster because the transfer rate from AGP to CPU (NB bottleneck) is much higher. For instance, on my XP platform, I see no scaling from increasing the CPU frequency, but huge scaling when I increase the FSB frequency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I ll post a submission tomorrow. i was trying to get 350 out of the setup. I read I can do pin mods on my socket a athlon and overclock further -- so im going to try some of those. You can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.