steponz Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 I was able to acheive this time without any cheats. Not sure what to believe... Really make me think that wprime should be removed as a bench. I can replicate and can take video if needed to show the result and what happens. My SS drops 10 to 15 to degrees when I run this and the SS makes a whoosh sound. Very interesting... and haven't seen this happen even when I have had my gulftown up at 5.1ghz with 1.8v vcore.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 If bugged scores are enough to remove a benchmark, we need to kick the whole FM series from HWBot:p If the bug is obvious, it's no problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steponz Posted December 31, 2009 Author Share Posted December 31, 2009 Honestly the wprime versions need to be splitup into the different versions on the board. Kind of like how FutureMark stuff is... A benchmarking program should have much more logging in it then what is out there today... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 because you can replicate a bug doesnt make it valid this is def not a keepable score, why do you think you are so much faster than everyone else with higher clocks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 There was also posted a replicable superpi 32m score that was WAY out of line. So... we must remove anything except PiFast, CPUZ and AM3:p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 I hope you see that your run is just way out of line ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steponz Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 I see its out of line.. I totally understand that. I was just wondering if there was a way to see if it was invalid. I would run another test and it would tell me that the last was successful... There should be a better way of validation.. I guess we will just have to wait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oj0 Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I was just wondering if there was a way to see if it was invalid. Is it being ten times quicker than it should be not enough? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steponz Posted January 7, 2010 Author Share Posted January 7, 2010 Never..... a boy can dream ya know....lol.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.