Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Wrong Result


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Crew
I see Sweet is taking care of the invalid/wrong version of Wprime results. You might as well add these to the list. ;)

 

Both are wrong version. :D :nana:

 

I'm sorry but all version that i wrote are old version , so they are not valid, I found many submit whit 1.58 version , but I don't post, because I think they are validates.

Thank you for revise my bench's, I hope you have enjoyed,..... some are not good, but i hope improve;)

In this discussion both lose something, no?

 

And pointhore , you have many Invalidates WPrime, see this my friend:

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636538

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616055

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612977

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612352

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603271

 

:eek:

 

Regards, and sweet dreams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WPrime 1024

Score Invalid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572357

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572553

 

 

WPrime 32

Score Invalid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600760

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600758

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648001

 

 

No Cpu-z, no validation, only Wprime in screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663439

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=646848

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682013

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651953

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680192

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651952 besides wrong score submit 11.00 seg but true 11.343 seg

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660602

 

 

No screen, link to forum post without screen, no validation

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692030

 

Wrong WPrime ( 1.55 mandatory 01-01-2008)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697106 1.54 Version - date 06-02-2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698419 1.54 Version - date 10-02-2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689841 1.43 Version - date 20-01-2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686076 1.54 version - date 09-01-2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693349 1.54 version - date 29-01-2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699401 1.53 version - date 12-02-2008

 

Hexus _PiFast

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721369 **Error In Computation**

 

fixed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639164

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638790

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640642

no proff at all

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720784

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707999

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708732

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720783

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720782

new result without gpu-z

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677689

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677579

no resolution appear

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638071 in this one... i think that it is a different card (flashed bios) because it works with 450mhz at memory..... it is to far away from real...even the first score run on 380..... it's impossible ddr with stock frequency 250 to reach 450.... it could be a different card with ddr2 mems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but all version that i wrote are old version , so they are not valid, I found many submit whit 1.58 version , but I don't post, because I think they are validates.

Thank you for revise my bench's, I hope you have enjoyed,..... some are not good, but i hope improve;)

In this discussion both lose something, no?

 

And pointhore , you have many Invalidates WPrime, see this my friend:

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636538

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616055

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612977

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612352

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603271

 

:eek:

 

Regards, and sweet dreams

 

fixed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fixed

 

At one time the following were able to be verfied on the Wprime website.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=616055

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=612977

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=612352

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=603271

 

The software available to us had some bugs in it at that time giving the Invalid checksum response. Of course we can't check them now since the Wprime database can no longer be accessed. :rolleyes: You can block these if you want, it's up to you. ;)

 

P.S. Some of these were already blocked and then reinstated by Massman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

since the Wprime database can no longer be accessed

 

Verification link format was changed but wPrime database works fine!

Old wprime verification link format: http://www.wprime.net/cgi-bin/score.exe?id=<result_number>

New wprime verification link format: http://www.wprime.net/score.cgi?id=<result_number>

 

Even if you can't convert link from old to new format manually, you can use search feature at wprime site - http://www.wprime.net/search.html?r=searchscore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...