Wrong Result

onni · March 11, 2008

2900 Pro 512bit Flashed to XT ?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695974

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679095'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679095

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679095

Mayk · March 11, 2008

This is result on SLI - Description: Core 2 QX6850 @ 4000MHz, 8800GTX SLI 680/1098

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652206

gradus · March 11, 2008

skwiatek-hard-pc.pl (United Team of Poland)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705676 - no info, not default settings

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709995 - photoshop

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705669 - no info

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710106 - pantera 366?!?! %)

demiurg · March 12, 2008

no resolution
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590534

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658540

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588988

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591432

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591435

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633387

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565791

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622769

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628170

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628451

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621899

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621902

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694818

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651110

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685750

more proof

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=586881

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591480

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688759

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680019 can't see resolution etc

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649259 can't see graphic card

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622770 can't see graphic card

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603857 can't see graphic card

ERROR in computation

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590416

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690154

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591716

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627800

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649644

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657082

bad superpi version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648233

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648273

bad screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599607

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588968

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662624

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619718

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600733

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607713

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651408

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572140

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647722

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566555

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592541

fixed

demiurg · March 12, 2008

Hi! i think these results are wrong (in the wrong categort):

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=703905

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=703471

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=703447

if you look to one my result you see that the x550 xtx has 64bis but and 128 mb ram; that one of the other user should be a radeon x300 se, 128bit bus and 256 mb ram.

fixed

71proste · March 12, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706411

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698991 no res

dinos22 · March 12, 2008

3DM01 results possibly obtained using mipmap- natures FPS are way too high

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=698991

Thanks

james said he didn't use it

can you prove that these guys were running mipmaps

:confused:

demiurg · March 12, 2008

If resolution is not shown in a screenshot, but the benchmark score is obviously correct for the hardware used, should we still block the score?

IMHO dura lex sed lex One rule for everyone

K404 · March 12, 2008

james said he didn't use it

can you prove that these guys were running mipmaps

Its part arrogance but if guys are pulling 1-200 FPS better than me in nature at the same clocks, lower or only slightly higher, I call mipmap.

Iv only called out scores using GTS512MB cards because I can relate to it best. I got 860FPS in nature at 1024/2560/1095 and based everything around that. I know my FPS should have been higher, but I really dont think 950FPS+ is an option without being around 1075MHz core, if not more?

CPU does nothing to the score and I find that 100MHz on the core adds ~60FPS to the score.

MaXtoRZP · March 12, 2008

IMHO dura lex sed lex One rule for everyone

This result has been verificated at ORB. Or no matter for you??? Rule - is rule?

It seems that you wanna lose a lot of registered members of hwbot.

K404 · March 12, 2008

LOL Im trying to get so much info into screenies that I dont pay attention to res.

Chances are, its often covered by a score breakdown window My conscience is crystal clear though. Il pass it onto the guys at BTUK that res is needed in screenies

demiurg · March 12, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706411
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698991 no res

These rеsalts has valid ORB link, where resolution are shown!

71proste · March 12, 2008

If resolution is not shown in a screenshot, but the benchmark score is obviously correct for the hardware used, should we still block the score?

im sorry mate,the verification links show correct resolution now,I just checked screens only-my bad:woot:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706411 OK

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698991 OK

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573451 checksum invalid and still got some points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567829

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676226 pls check it,im not saying it's wrong,I never used notes for verification,I want to be sure is ok

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626636

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709001 no name of card

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658261

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584197 no res

Narmer · March 12, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691239 yy?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710331 no resolution

demiurg · March 13, 2008

im sorry mate,the verification links show correct resolution now,I just checked screens only-my bad:woot:
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706411 OK

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698991 OK

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573451 checksum invalid and still got some points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567829

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676226 pls check it,im not saying it's wrong,I never used notes for verification,I want to be sure is ok

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626636

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709001 no name of card

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658261

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584197 no res

checked and fixed

demiurg · March 13, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691239 yy?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710331 no resolution

fixed

boshuter · March 13, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695974 Wrong card, this is XT, not pro.

Can we please get the HD2900pro submissions fixed? It seems a lot of people are flashing the pro to xt then submitting scores under pro..... this is not right, when that card is flashed it is for all intents and purposes, an xt; It's recognized by all the benchmarks as xt. If they want to score pts in the pro class, then bench a pro, not an xt. This is not fair to the people who actually want to bench a pro card and submit, they shouldn't have to compete against those who are too lazy to oc their card the traditional way.

beleno · March 13, 2008

fixed

the result of 3dmark06 you fixed yesterday has come back...

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703447

no gpuz screen and wrong vga

demiurg · March 13, 2008

the result of 3dmark06 you fixed yesterday has come back...

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703447

no gpuz screen and wrong vga

blocked

71proste · March 13, 2008

I found very intresting THING:

It's about two top guys from H.O.T.(gprhellas&hipro5) first thing first..

gprhellas 3dmark 03

Processor: Core 2 QX9650 (3.00... @ 5802mhz on LN2

Videocard: 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 @ 990/1150mhz

Motherboard: BlackOps

Global Rank: 2nd - 75.6 points

Hardware Rank: 2nd 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 - 11.9 points

Scan date: 09-03-2008 02:09

ONE DAY AFTER

Hipro5 3dmark 03

Processor: Core 2 QX9650 (3.00... @ 5791mhz on LN2

Videocard: 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 @ 990/1150mhz

Motherboard: FOXCONN BlackOps X48

Global Rank: 1st - 94.5 points

Hardware Rank: 1st 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 - 14.8 points

Scan date: 10-03-2008 09:08

result is almost same,SAME: motherboard,cpu,graphic cards,psu,graphic drivers,operating system,steping of cpu,Jezus-WTF??????????????

I don't believe that those guys have different hardware,this is same stuff

I leave it under moderation and I hope some of You guys can see what is going on here.I'm not blind and I believe what I see,I need explanation!!!!

pls comments...

demiurg · March 13, 2008

I found very intresting THING:
It's about two top guys from H.O.T.(gprhellas&hipro5) first thing first..

gprhellas 3dmark 03

Processor: Core 2 QX9650 (3.00... @ 5802mhz on LN2

Videocard: 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 @ 990/1150mhz

Motherboard: BlackOps

Global Rank: 2nd - 75.6 points

Hardware Rank: 2nd 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 - 11.9 points

Scan date: 09-03-2008 02:09

ONE DAY AFTER

Hipro5 3dmark 03

Processor: Core 2 QX9650 (3.00... @ 5791mhz on LN2

Videocard: 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 @ 990/1150mhz

Motherboard: FOXCONN BlackOps X48

Global Rank: 1st - 94.5 points

Hardware Rank: 1st 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 - 14.8 points

Scan date: 10-03-2008 09:08

result is almost same,same motherboard,same cpu,same graphic cards,even screens looks same,psu same,-WTF is going on??????????????

I don't believe that those guys have different hardware,this is same stuff

I dont want to see people share with hardware,I dont mind it's Hipro5 or anyone,im not afraid to show people what is true or not,please don't be blind !!!!Im seek of this!!!!!