onni Posted March 11, 2008 Share Posted March 11, 2008 2900 Pro 512bit Flashed to XT ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695974 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679095'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679095 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679095 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayk Posted March 11, 2008 Share Posted March 11, 2008 This is result on SLI - Description: Core 2 QX6850 @ 4000MHz, 8800GTX SLI 680/1098 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652206 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted March 11, 2008 Share Posted March 11, 2008 skwiatek-hard-pc.pl (United Team of Poland) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705676 - no info, not default settings http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709995 - photoshop http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705669 - no info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710106 - pantera 366?!?! %) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 no resolutionhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590534 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588988 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591432 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591435 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633387 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565791 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622769 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628170 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628451 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621899 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621902 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694818 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651110 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685750 more proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=586881 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591480 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688759 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680019 can't see resolution etc http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649259 can't see graphic card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622770 can't see graphic card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603857 can't see graphic card ERROR in computation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590416 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690154 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591716 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627800 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649644 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657082 bad superpi version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648233 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648273 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599607 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588968 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662624 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619718 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600733 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607713 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651408 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572140 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647722 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566555 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592541 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 Hi! i think these results are wrong (in the wrong categort): http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=703905 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=703471 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=703447 if you look to one my result you see that the x550 xtx has 64bis but and 128 mb ram; that one of the other user should be a radeon x300 se, 128bit bus and 256 mb ram. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706411 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698991 no res Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 3DM01 results possibly obtained using mipmap- natures FPS are way too high http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=698991 Thanks james said he didn't use it can you prove that these guys were running mipmaps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 If resolution is not shown in a screenshot, but the benchmark score is obviously correct for the hardware used, should we still block the score? IMHO dura lex sed lex One rule for everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 james said he didn't use it can you prove that these guys were running mipmaps Its part arrogance but if guys are pulling 1-200 FPS better than me in nature at the same clocks, lower or only slightly higher, I call mipmap. Iv only called out scores using GTS512MB cards because I can relate to it best. I got 860FPS in nature at 1024/2560/1095 and based everything around that. I know my FPS should have been higher, but I really dont think 950FPS+ is an option without being around 1075MHz core, if not more? CPU does nothing to the score and I find that 100MHz on the core adds ~60FPS to the score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaXtoRZP Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 IMHO dura lex sed lex One rule for everyone This result has been verificated at ORB. Or no matter for you??? Rule - is rule? It seems that you wanna lose a lot of registered members of hwbot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 LOL Im trying to get so much info into screenies that I dont pay attention to res. Chances are, its often covered by a score breakdown window My conscience is crystal clear though. Il pass it onto the guys at BTUK that res is needed in screenies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706411http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698991 no res These rеsalts has valid ORB link, where resolution are shown! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 If resolution is not shown in a screenshot, but the benchmark score is obviously correct for the hardware used, should we still block the score? im sorry mate,the verification links show correct resolution now,I just checked screens only-my bad:woot: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706411 OK http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698991 OK http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573451 checksum invalid and still got some points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567829 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676226 pls check it,im not saying it's wrong,I never used notes for verification,I want to be sure is ok http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626636 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709001 no name of card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658261 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584197 no res Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691239 yy? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710331 no resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 im sorry mate,the verification links show correct resolution now,I just checked screens only-my bad:woot:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706411 OK http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698991 OK http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573451 checksum invalid and still got some points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567829 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676226 pls check it,im not saying it's wrong,I never used notes for verification,I want to be sure is ok http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626636 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709001 no name of card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658261 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584197 no res checked and fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691239 yy?http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710331 no resolution fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boshuter Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695974 Wrong card, this is XT, not pro. Can we please get the HD2900pro submissions fixed? It seems a lot of people are flashing the pro to xt then submitting scores under pro..... this is not right, when that card is flashed it is for all intents and purposes, an xt; It's recognized by all the benchmarks as xt. If they want to score pts in the pro class, then bench a pro, not an xt. This is not fair to the people who actually want to bench a pro card and submit, they shouldn't have to compete against those who are too lazy to oc their card the traditional way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beleno Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 fixed the result of 3dmark06 you fixed yesterday has come back... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703447 no gpuz screen and wrong vga Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 the result of 3dmark06 you fixed yesterday has come back... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703447 no gpuz screen and wrong vga blocked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 I found very intresting THING: It's about two top guys from H.O.T.(gprhellas&hipro5) first thing first.. gprhellas 3dmark 03 Processor: Core 2 QX9650 (3.00... @ 5802mhz on LN2 Videocard: 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 @ 990/1150mhz Motherboard: BlackOps Global Rank: 2nd - 75.6 points Hardware Rank: 2nd 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 - 11.9 points Scan date: 09-03-2008 02:09 ONE DAY AFTER Hipro5 3dmark 03 Processor: Core 2 QX9650 (3.00... @ 5791mhz on LN2 Videocard: 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 @ 990/1150mhz Motherboard: FOXCONN BlackOps X48 Global Rank: 1st - 94.5 points Hardware Rank: 1st 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 - 14.8 points Scan date: 10-03-2008 09:08 result is almost same,SAME: motherboard,cpu,graphic cards,psu,graphic drivers,operating system,steping of cpu,Jezus-WTF?????????????? I don't believe that those guys have different hardware,this is same stuff I leave it under moderation and I hope some of You guys can see what is going on here.I'm not blind and I believe what I see,I need explanation!!!! pls comments... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 I found very intresting THING:It's about two top guys from H.O.T.(gprhellas&hipro5) first thing first.. gprhellas 3dmark 03 Processor: Core 2 QX9650 (3.00... @ 5802mhz on LN2 Videocard: 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 @ 990/1150mhz Motherboard: BlackOps Global Rank: 2nd - 75.6 points Hardware Rank: 2nd 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 - 11.9 points Scan date: 09-03-2008 02:09 ONE DAY AFTER Hipro5 3dmark 03 Processor: Core 2 QX9650 (3.00... @ 5791mhz on LN2 Videocard: 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 @ 990/1150mhz Motherboard: FOXCONN BlackOps X48 Global Rank: 1st - 94.5 points Hardware Rank: 1st 2x Radeon HD 3870 X2 - 14.8 points Scan date: 10-03-2008 09:08 result is almost same,same motherboard,same cpu,same graphic cards,even screens looks same,psu same,-WTF is going on?????????????? I don't believe that those guys have different hardware,this is same stuff I dont want to see people share with hardware,I dont mind it's Hipro5 or anyone,im not afraid to show people what is true or not,please don't be blind !!!!Im seek of this!!!!! This question will be considered by staff of moderators Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Very good I hope some guys play fair.Thank U for attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patagonian Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700724 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638057 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649778 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556475 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647067 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647079 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645068 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645069 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675327 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610579 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671616 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637604 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639414 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678356 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679918 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beleno Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 blocked again... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710651 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted March 13, 2008 Crew Share Posted March 13, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702839 Wrong Wprime 32: 1.55 Mandatory (1-1-2008) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690203 Date 21-01-2008 WPrime 1.41 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709820 Date 11-03-2008 WPrime 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685737 Date 08-01-2008 WPrime 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683396 Date 02-01-2008 Wprime 1.41 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701277 Date 17-02-2008 WPrime 1.54 No Screen , no validation , link to forumpost (No screen-No validation) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648816 WPrime 32-Verfication: checksum: (invalid) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636949 Fix it , Thank's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts