I.nfraR.ed Posted August 11, 2012 Share Posted August 11, 2012 Oh..I want to ask why I'm at the lowest place from all people with 5.453, when I have the lowest core clock = best efficiency. Shouldn't it be the opposite way? Just saying...I want to beat Massman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeepBeep2 Posted August 11, 2012 Share Posted August 11, 2012 I wish HWBOT worked that way too, I have a X4 955 result in wP 32M that is last out of three with best efficiency. However here at HWBOT they rank it upon submission times, maybe we should propose it is ranked by best efficiency, because it shows moar skeel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted August 11, 2012 Share Posted August 11, 2012 I think Massman once said something like "it's overclocking => more cpu speed = higher rank" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted August 11, 2012 Share Posted August 11, 2012 In case of a tie, chronological order matters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted August 11, 2012 Author Share Posted August 11, 2012 (edited) Nah, for me overclocking is not pure frequency and being the first to submit, it's optimizing every aspect of the system that matters in the given benchmark. In other words: squeezing the last ounce of performance from the system. Just my understanding. I'm not complaining (much) for those "lost" 1.6p, I just feel the proper ranking is in reverse order by cpu frequency (it's a cpu benchmark after all, although other factors play role as well). I can easily beat it with better settings. CPU-Z validations are okay to rank by submission time. Only frequency matters there. In case of a tie, chronological order matters. Seems to be this way in the bot, but don't see how that matters for pi, wprime, ucbench, pifast. What is more valuable - being fast and in a hurry, picking a better cpu and running at higher frequency or submitting later with worse cpu, but same score (spent more time on tweaking)? I know the answer for me, but others might think different. That;'s just a hypothetical question, not saying my score is uber efficient. Actually I feel it's quite the opposite . I think Massman once said something like "it's overclocking => more cpu speed = higher rank" Not applied here, scores are ranked by submission time. Bottom line is I'm behind Massman, when we all know he sucks Edited August 11, 2012 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.