knopflerbruce - Athlon 64 FX-55 San Diego @ 3787.3MHz - 22sec 520ms SuperPi

[Guest GoriLLakoS]

Why screenshot CPU-Z says FX-57?

[Christian Ney]

Knut u drunk, go home

[TaPaKaH]

you question weirdness of Knut's CPU collection samples?

I believe back in the day there were 'unique' San Diego CPUs that disguised themselves as other models (text on IHS and CPUz did not match) - this is one of them.

[Hyperhorn]

If that's the case here an uploader should attach a pic of the IHS and/or any other (additional) proof in advance.

[Guest GoriLLakoS]

Maybe it is one GodLike CPU from this batch http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?64370-Fx&p=889817&viewfull=1#post889817

 

"This cpu was one of a few "special" fx55's hard-coded by AMD's DVT (Design Verification Testing) team as an FX57"

 

Move him up to the FX-57 category cause i am preparing for a 939 war

[knopflerbruce]

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?64370-Fx&p=889817&viewfull=1#post889817 - yep, I can post a picture later of the CPU. Not so easy to find it among so many others ^^

[I.nfraR.ed]

I don't think it's needed, it doesn't prove anything, but the fact you have such a cpu.

Theoretically it doesn't stop you from using real FX-57, even if you show a picture of that particular FX-55

Same valid for all K7 cpus.

We just hope everyone is playing fair like you .

[knopflerbruce]

I don't think it's needed, it doesn't prove anything, but the fact you have such a cpu.

Theoretically it doesn't stop you from using real FX-57, even if you show a picture of that particular FX-55

Same valid for all K7 cpus.

We just hope everyone is playing fair like you .

 

Yeah, it's rather unfortunate that this particular chip is the best one Got a 3850 chip that show the correct model.