I.nfraR.ed Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Christian Ney is not impresses, need to improve efficiency in the future Quote
Stermy57 Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 great score I have the same mobo but i have not test well it... Do you have voltage problem with its? Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 It has a huge vdroop and can't post with vdimm higher than 1.755V or so. Quote
Calathea Posted January 1, 2013 Posted January 1, 2013 Not so efficient but damn dat cpu! Sub 10 sec on AMD is still very cool. Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted January 1, 2013 Posted January 1, 2013 The core is slow, but when more than one enabled, the cpu just doesn't clock so high. Quote
Massman Posted January 1, 2013 Author Posted January 1, 2013 Because of the temperature probably. Have you tried clocking down the second core to like 300mhz just to get lower temp? Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted January 1, 2013 Posted January 1, 2013 300 no, but 1000 - 2000. Other cores don't clock so well and even if more efficient than the first one, the difference in the frequency can't justify it. Will try it some other time, when I'm not in a hurry . Quote
BeepBeep2 Posted January 2, 2013 Posted January 2, 2013 This is still a great CPU though I wanna see ~9.800 out of you cuz I'll be rocking with the UD5 here soon, need to bin some more 965s too. Quote
Stermy57 Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 It has a huge vdroop and can't post with vdimm higher than 1.755V or so. uhh thanks for this information remember the Gigabyte 970UD3 is a low end mobo only 70/80€ so it's a good main performance/price... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.