January 19, 201313 yr Really? I think you're wrong. http://hwbot.org/submission/2325462_gluvocio_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_960t_be_45849_marks/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2263057_s_a_v_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_960t_be_47057_marks/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2336036_sofos1990_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_960t_be_48865_marks/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2336688_moose83_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_960t_be_49299_marks/ Edited January 19, 201313 yr by Mr.Scott
January 20, 201313 yr Mr. Scott - in order of links: Gluvocio's, sofos1990 & Moose were all using a combination of arecas with onboard cache and xpertraid. SAV's sub was the one submission only using xpert and this can be seen in his low GU subtest. Paco looks to be using a LSI 3081E-R or rebrand Intel SASUC8I, (bloody nice find to get a controller working with iRams BTW. I only found HighPoint's to work). Either way the controller has no onboard cache. Noting that, I have 9 iRams here and when running 8 in R0 I don't get 100% scaling. iRams deliver around 120mbs at best so in a perfect world where everything runs like it's on paper the GU is still significantly higher than possible. With no ORB link to compare VS I would agree with El Gappo and flag this sub needing further evidence. Edited January 20, 201313 yr by Yamunsa
January 20, 201313 yr no problem gentlemen, forgot what I got for VS but will re-run it when I get a chance with an orb link. meantime deleted
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.